Journals / Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi / 2019 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 4

Ten-Year Experience Outcomes of a Day Treatment for Children and Adolescents with Psychiatric Disorders

Psikiyatrik Hastalığı Olan Çocuk ve Ergen Hastalara Hizmet Veren Gündüz Kliniği’nin On Yıllık İzlem Sonuçları

Pages
283–287
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It also shows the necessity of a treatment that combines multiple modalities like day treatment and day treatment must be more generalize for these patient population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: It was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a day treatmentclinic in Turkey and which has been serving for ten years for children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders.Methods: 262 patients who completed day treatment within ten years were tested at intake and discharge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The CGIS scores varied from moderately disturbed (4.83±0.88) to much improved (2.55±0.93) demonstratedthattreatmentresponsesshowedimprovement.Wilcoxon T tests showed that patients were significantly more anxious and depressive at intake and had more problems in self esteem.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It also shows the necessity of a treatment that combines multiple modalities like day treatment and day treatment must be more generalize for these patient population.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: It was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a day treatmentclinic in Turkey and which has been serving for ten years for children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders.Methods: 262 patients who completed day treatment within ten years were tested at intake and discharge. The patients’ functioning was assessed using the Children’s Global Assesment Scale (CGAS), Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGIS), state-trait anxiety inventory for children, depression rating scale for children, Coopersmith self-esteem inventory for children. Pre/post treatment comparisons were made on same variables.Results: Statistical analyses showed that, improvement was maintained on all measures. The high CGAS scores at discharge were showed well-being and good functioning of patients. The CGIS scores varied from moderately disturbed (4.83±0.88) to much improved (2.55±0.93) demonstratedthattreatmentresponsesshowedimprovement.Wilcoxon T tests showed that patients were significantly more anxious and depressive at intake and had more problems in self esteem. State-trait anxiety inventory for children and depression rating scale for children scores decreased and Coopersmith self-esteem inventory for children scores improved with day treatment.Conclusion: This study points that as results of ten-year experience, day treatment approach seems effective and therefore to be the treatment of choice for treating children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders. It also shows the necessity of a treatment that combines multiple modalities like day treatment and day treatment must be more generalize for these patient population.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada psikiyatrik hastalığı olan çocuk ve ergenlere on yıldırhizmetverengündüzkliniğininetkinliğinindeğerlendirilmesiamaçlanmıştır.Yöntem: Yaklaşık on yıl içerisinde gündüz kliniğini tamamlayan 262 hastakliniğegiriştevetaburculuktadeğerlendirilmiştir.Hastalarınişlevselliği çocuklar için genel değerlendirme ölçeği (ÇGDÖ), klinik global izlem ölçeği (KGİ), çocuklar için durumluk - sürekli kaygı ölçeği, çocuklar için depresyon ölçeği, Coopersmith benlik saygısı ölçeği - çocuk formu ile değerlendirilmiştir. Tedavi öncesi ve sonrası değerlendirmeler benzer değişkenler üzerinden yapılmıştır.Sonuçlar: İstatistiksel analizler değerlendirilen tüm alanlarda iyileşmeler olduğunu göstermiştir. Taburculukta yüksek ÇGDÖ puanları hastaların iyilik hallerini ve iyi işlevselliklerini göstermiştir. KGİ puanları orta derecede rahatsız (4,83±0,88)’dan çok düzelmiş (2,55±0,93) maddesine değişim göstermiştir. Wilcoxon T testi sonuçları hastaların tedavi başlangıcında anlamlı olarak daha anksiyöz ve depresif olduklarını; benlik saygıları ile daha fazla sorunları olduğunu göstermiştir. Çocuklar için depresyon ölçeği ve durumluk-sürekli kaygı ölçeği puanlarında azalma saptanırken, Coopersmith benlik saygısı ölçeği puanları artış göstermiştir.Tartışma: Bu çalışma on yıllık izlemin sonuçlarına göre, gündüz kliniği yaklaşımınınetkinolduğunuvepsikiyatrikhastalığıolançocukveergenlerin tedavisi için tercih edilebileceğini göstermiştir. Ayrıca gündüz kliniği gibi kapsayıcı tedavilere ihtiyacın olduğu ve bu hasta grubu için bu tür tedavi yaklaşımlarının yaygınlaştırılması gerektiği düşünülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞKUN, A., ÜNVER, H., KARA, İ., MEMİK, N. Ç., GÜNDOĞDU, Ö. Y. (2022). Ten-Year Experience Outcomes of a Day Treatment for Children and Adolescents with Psychiatric Disorders. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 4, 283–287. https://ajindex.com/articles/584667

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Hersov L. Day hospitals and centers for children and adolescents in Great Britain. Int J Partial Hosp 1988;5:3–13
  2. Heston JD, Kiser LJ. Child and adolescent partial hospitalization. In: Lewis M, editor. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Textbook. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996. pp.883–890
  3. Zimet SG, Farley GK. Day treatment for children in the United States. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1985;24:732–738. [CrossRef ] 4. Goldfarb W, Goldfarb N, Pollack RC. Treatment of childhood schizophrenia. A three-year comparison of day and residential treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1966;14:119–128. [CrossRef ] 5. Baenen RS, Stephens MAP, Glenwick DS. Outcome in psychoeducational day school programs: a review. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1986;56:263–270. [CrossRef ] 6. Grizenko N. Outcome of multimodal day treatment for children with severe behavior problems: a five-year follow-up. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997;36:989–997. [CrossRef ] 7. Grizenko N, Papineau D, Sayegh L. A comparison of day treatment and outpatient treatment for children with disruptive behavior problems. Can J Psychiatry 1993;38:432–435. [CrossRef ] 8. Evans JL. Partial hospitalization: criteria for admission. Int J Partial Hosp 1987;4:75–83
  4. Kiser LJ, Nunn WB, Millsap PA, Heston JD, McDonald JC, Trapp CA, Pruitt DB. Child and adolescent day treatment: population profile. Int J Partial Hosp 1988;5:287–305
  5. Doan RJ, Petti TA. Clinical and demographic characteristics of child and adolescent partial hospital patients. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1989;28:66–69. [CrossRef ] 11. Block BM, Arney K, Campbell DJ, Kiser LJ, Lefkovitz PM, Speer SK. American Association for Partial Hospitalization Child and Adolescent Special Interest Group: standards for child and adolescent partial hospitalization programs. Int J Partial Hosp 1991;7:13–21
  6. Grizenko N, Papineau D. A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of day treatment and residential treatment for children with severe behaviour problems. Can J Psychiatry 1992;37:393–400. [CrossRef ] 13. Byrnes EI, Hansen KG, Malloy TE, Carter C, Curry D. Reductions in criminality subsequent to group, individual, and family therapy in adolescent residential and day treatment settings. Int J Group Psychother 1999;49:307–322. [CrossRef ] 14. Remschmidt H, Schmidt MH, Mattejat F, Eisert HG, Eisert M. Therapy evaluation in child and adolescent psychiatry: inpatient treatment, day care treatment and home treatment in comparison. Z