Journals / Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi / 2022 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 1

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-Brief in Adolescents

Barratt Dürtüsellik Ölçeği-Kısa Türkçe Versiyonunun Adolesanlarda Psikometrik Özellikleri

Pages
48–53
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The BIS-Brief scores had a significant correlation with the scores of CBCL’s aggression subscale (r=0.48; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-Brief (BIS-Brief) is a selfreport scale that can be used to measure impulsivity in adolescents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study included two groups of 116 psychiatric outpatients and 175 middle and high school students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The BIS-Brief scores had a significant correlation with the scores of CBCL’s aggression subscale (r=0.48; p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-Brief (BIS-Brief) is a selfreport scale that can be used to measure impulsivity in adolescents. In this study, it was aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the BIS-Brief in clinical and non-clinical adolescent samples. Methods: The study included two groups of 116 psychiatric outpatients and 175 middle and high school students. For the re-test study, a small subgroup of the patient group (n=21) was re-applied BIS-Brief three weeks later. Socio-demographic data of the participants were collected. Aggression subscale of Childhood Behavior Checklist (CBCL), hyperactivity/impulsivity and anger control problems subscales of Conners-Wells’ Adolescents Self-Report Scale-Long (CASS-L), and hyperactivity subscale of Conner’s Parent Rating Scale–Short Form (CPRS-S) were administered. Results: The mean ages of the patient and control groups were 15.22±1.58 years and 15.16±1.86 years, respectively. There were 77 (66.4%) males in the patient group and 107 (61.1%) males in the control group. Cronbach’s alphas for internal consistency were 0.78 (patient group) and 0.70 (control group). Three weeks test-retest reliability was 0.64 (patient group). We found a two-dimensional structure for the Turkish BIS-Brief. The BIS-Brief scores had a significant correlation with the scores of CBCL’s aggression subscale (r=0.48; p

Özet

Amaç: Barratt Dürtüsellik Ölçeği-Kısa (BDÖ-K) adolesanlarda dürtüselliği ölçmek için kullanılan bir öz bildirim ölçeğidir. Bu çalışmada BDÖ-K’nin Türk adolesanlarda psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Çalışmada 175 ortaokul ve lise öğrencisi ile çocuk ve ergen psikiyatri polikliniğine ayaktan başvuran 116 hastadan oluşan iki grup vardı. Yeniden test çalışması için, hasta grubunun küçük bir alt grubuna (n=21) üç hafta sonra BDÖ-K tekrar uygulandı. Araştırmacılar tarafından sosyodemografik veri formu dolduruldu ve katılımcılara Çocuk Davranış Değerlendirme Ölçeğinin (ÇDDÖ) saldırganlık alt ölçeği, Conners-Wells Ergen Öz bildirim Ölçeği-Uzun formunun (CEÖÖ-U) hiperaktivite/ dürtüsellik ve öfke kontrol problemleri alt ölçekleri ve Conners Ebeveyn Derecelendirme Ölçeği-Kısa formunun (CEDÖ-K) hiperaktivite alt ölçeği uygulandı. Bulgular: Hasta ve kontrol grubunun yaş ortalamaları sırasıyla 15,22±1,58 ve 15,16±1,86 yıl idi. Hasta grubunda 77 (%66,4), kontrol grubunda ise 107 (%61,1) erkek vardı. İki grup arasında yaş ve cinsiyet açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark yoktu. İç tutarlılığı değerlendirmek için hesaplanan Cronbach alfa değerleri 0,78 (hasta) ve 0,70 (kontrol) idi. Üç hafta arayla yapılan test-yeniden test güvenirlik katsayısı hasta grubunda 0,64 olarak bulundu. Yapılan açıklayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda BDÖ-K’nin iki boyutlu bir yapıya sahip olduğu saptandı. Kontrol grubunda BDÖ-K ile ÇDDÖ’nün saldırgan davranış alt ölçeği (r=0,48; p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLEÇ, H., DURMUŞ, F. B., TORLAK, C. Y., TÜĞEN, L. E. (2022). Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-Brief in Adolescents. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 1, 48–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/584569

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Moeller FG, Barratt ES, Dougherty DM, Schmitz JM, Swann AC. Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. Am J Psychiatry 2001
  2. [Crossref] 2. Nigg JT. Response inhibition and disruptive behaviors: toward a multiprocess conception of etiological heterogeneity for ADHD combined type and conduct disorder early-onset type. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003
  3. [Crossref] 3. De Wit H. Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addict Biol 2009
  4. [Crossref] 4. Gilbert KE, Kalmar JH, Womer FY, Markovich PJ, Pittman B, Nolen-Hoeksema S, et al. Impulsivity in Adolescent Bipolar Disorder. Acta Neuropsychiatr 2001
  5. [Crossref] 5. Cao F, Su L, Liu T, Gao X. The relationship between impulsivity and Internet addiction in a sample of Chinese adolescents. Eur Psychiatry 2007
  6. [Crossref] 6. Blaszczynski A, Nower LA. pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction 2002
  7. [Crossref] 7. Chambers RA, Potenza MN. Neurodevelopment, impulsivity, and adolescent gambling. J Gambl Stud 2003
  8. [Crossref] 8. Diemen LV, Szobot CM, Kessler F, Perchansky F. Adaptation and construct validation of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS 11) to Brazilian Portuguese for use in adolescents. Braz J Psychiatry 2007
  9. [Crossref] 9. Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol 1995
  10. [Crossref] 10. Steinberg L, Sharp C, Stanford MS, Tharp AT. New tricks for an old measure: The development of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale–Brief (BIS-Brief). Psychol Assess 2003
  11. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0030550 11. Bussing R, Fernandez M, Harwood M, Hou W, Garvan CW, Eyberg SM, et al. Parent and teacher SNAP-IV ratings of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms: psychometric properties and normative ratings from a school district sample Assess 2008
  12. [Crossref] 12. Conners CK, Wells KC, Parker JD, Sitarenios G, Diamond JM, Powel JW. A new self-report scale for assessment of adolescent psychopathology: factor structure, reliability, validity, and diagnostic sensitivity. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1997
  13. [Crossref] 13. Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao UMA, Flynn C, Moreci P, et al. Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychia