Journals / Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Investigating Teacher Certificate Program in Turkey: Prospective Teachers' Technological and Pedagogical Content Knowledge

Türkiye'deki Formasyon Programının İncelenmesi:Öğretmen Adaylarının Teknolojik vePedagoji kAlan Bilgisi

Pages
252–274
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consistent with the teacher education literature, we concluded that better support mechanisms with an emphasis on educational pedagogy should be implemented to graduate more qualified teacher candidates

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkish Council of Higher Education (YÖK) has initiated a new teacher certification program to provide an opportunity for graduates of certain faculties to qualify as teachers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus measuring the occupational readiness level of this group joining the teacher candidates is crucial.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consistent with the teacher education literature, we concluded that better support mechanisms with an emphasis on educational pedagogy should be implemented to graduate more qualified teacher candidates
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Turkish Council of Higher Education (YÖK) has initiated a new teacher certification program to provide an opportunity for graduates of certain faculties to qualify as teachers. Thus measuring the occupational readiness level of this group joining the teacher candidates is crucial. The main purpose of this study is to measure the pedagogical knowledge of students attending teacher certificate program with an aim of becoming mathematics teachers. This study was conducted with candidates who are about to complete the teacher certification program at a university in southeastern part of Turkey. Analyses revealed that age, gender, and experience of teacher candidates attending teacher certificate programs had no effect on their opinions about their content, technology, and pedagogy readiness. Although candidates expressed readiness in terms of technological skills and pedagogical knowledge, they had a hard time when asked to give examples about these two topics. Consistent with the teacher education literature, we concluded that better support mechanisms with an emphasis on educational pedagogy should be implemented to graduate more qualified teacher candidates

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEN, S., ERDOĞAN, N., DELEN, İ. (2022). Investigating Teacher Certificate Program in Turkey: Prospective Teachers' Technological and Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 252–274. https://ajindex.com/articles/584134

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Bullough JR, R. V. ve Knowles, J. G. (1990). Becoming a teacher: Struggles of a second career beginning teacher. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(2), 101-112.
  2. Bulut, A. (2012). Investigating Perceptions Of Preservice Mathematics Teachers On Their Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (Tpack) Regarding Geometry (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara/ TURKEY. Chambers, D. (2002). The real world and the classroom: Second-career teachers. The Clearing House, 75(4), 212-217.
  3. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459.
  4. Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design (2ndedition).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Delen, I. (2014). Supporting students' scientific explanations: A case study investigating the synergy focusing on a teacher's practices when providing instruction and using mobile devices. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. Erdoğan, N. ve Stuessy, C. L. (2015). Modeling successful STEM high schools in the United States: An ecology framework. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 3(1), 77-92.
  5. Gömleksiz, M. N. ve Fidan, E. K. (2011). Pedagojik formasyon programı öğrencilerinin web pedagojik içerik bilgisine ilişkin öz-yeterlik algı düzeyleri. Electronic Turkish Studies, 6(4), 593-620.
  6. Kaya, Z., Kaya, O. N. ve Emre, İ. (2013). Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(4), 2355-2377.
  7. Lynch, S. J., Behrend, T., Burton, E. P., & Means, B. (2013, April). Inclusive STEM-focused high schools: STEM education policy and opportunity structures. Paper presented at the annual conference of National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Rio Grande, Puerto Rico. Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of TeacherEducation, 41(3), 3-11.
  8. Marshall, S. P. (2010). Re-imagining specialized STEM academies: Igniting and nurturing decidedly different minds, by design. Roeper Review, 32(1), 48-60.
  9. Mishra, P. ve Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  10. Öksüz, C., Şerife, A. K. ve Sanem, U. Ç. A. (2009). İlköğretim matematik öğretiminde teknoloji kullanımına ilişkin algı ölçeği. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniv