Journals / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

A Diagnostic Comparison of Turkish and Korean Students’ Mathematics Performances on the TIMSS 2011 Assessment

Pages
0–0
Publication Date
2016-01-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Despite the common reporting practice—single-score—in these large scale assessments gives useful insights about students’ overall performances, they still lack diagnostic information.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the present study was to analyze an international large-scale data set using a cognitive assessment approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Despite the common reporting practice—single-score—in these large scale assessments gives useful insights about students’ overall performances, they still lack diagnostic information.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results of the DINA model were used to make a detailed comparison between students of these two countries.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to analyze an international large-scale data set using a cognitive assessment approach. Although some researchers question the usefulness of international large-scale assessments (e.g., TIMSS), participating countries have continued to use the results from these large-scale assessments to improve their curricula and teaching methods. Despite the common reporting practice—single-score—in these large scale assessments gives useful insights about students’ overall performances, they still lack diagnostic information. Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) were developed to provide more feedback on students’ cognitive strengths and weaknesses. This study retrofitted the TIMSS 2011 eighth grade mathematics assessment by applying a specific CDM called the DINA (the deterministic, inputs, noisy, “and” gate) model to data from South Korea and Turkey. Results of the DINA model were used to make a detailed comparison between students of these two countries.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEN, S., ARICAN, M. (2016). A Diagnostic Comparison of Turkish and Korean Students’ Mathematics Performances on the TIMSS 2011 Assessment. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 0–0. https://ajindex.com/articles/137441

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Choi, M. K., Lee, Y-S., & Park, Y. S. (2015). What CDM can tell about what students have learned: An analysis of TIMSS eighth grade mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1563–1577.
  2. Chung, Y.L., & Son, D.H. (2000). Effects of cooperative learning strategy on achievement and science learning attitudes in middle school biology. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20, 611–623. Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010). The common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, D.C.: Author. Common Core State Standards Initiative (2014). Myths vs. facts. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/myths-vs-facts/ de la Torre, J. (2008). An empirically-based method of Q-matrix validation for the DINA model: Development and applications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45, 343–362. de la Torre, J., & Lee, Y. S. (2008, March). Relationships between cognitive diagnosis, CTT and IRT indices: An empirical investigation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York. de la Torre, J. (2009). DINA model and parameter estimation: A didactic. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 115–130. de la Torre, J. (2011). The generalized DINA model framework. Psychometrika, 76(2), 179–199.
  3. DiBello, L., Roussos, L. A., & Stout, W. (2007). Review of cognitively diagnostic assessment and a summary of psychometric models. In C. V. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of Statistics (Vol. 26, Psychometrics) (pp. 979–1027). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Dogan, E., & Tatsuoka, K. (2008). An international comparison using a diagnostic testing model: Turkish students’ profile of mathematical skills on TIMSS-R. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(3), 263–272.
  4. Doornik, J. A. (2003). Object-oriented matrix programming using Ox (version 3.1) [Computer software]. London: Timberlake Consultants Press.
  5. Fisher, D. L., & Kim, H. B. (1999, April). Constructivist learning environments in science classes in Korea. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. Fu, J., & Li, Y. (2007, April). An integrated review of cognitively diagnostic psychometric models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL. Haertel, E. H. (1989). Using restricted latent class models to map the skill structure of achievement items. Journal of