Journals / Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13

Örgütlerde dikey güven:Son on yıllık dönemdeki ampirik çalışmaların gözden geçirilmesi

Vertical trust in organizations:A review of empirical studies over the last decade

Pages
1–28
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Implications and future research directions are also discussed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The last decade has shown a proliferation in empirical trust studies in scientific journals due to the contribution of trust to organizational performance through increasing positive employee workplace intentions and behaviors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Given the theoretical suggestions and the empirical evidence on the importance of the referents of trust, this present study reviewed empirical research on trust considering three trust referents: supervisor, management, and organization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Implications and future research directions are also discussed
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The last decade has shown a proliferation in empirical trust studies in scientific journals due to the contribution of trust to organizational performance through increasing positive employee workplace intentions and behaviors. Given the theoretical suggestions and the empirical evidence on the importance of the referents of trust, this present study reviewed empirical research on trust considering three trust referents: supervisor, management, and organization. This parsimony of the trust research revealed that trust in organization has received much less empirical research attention than trust in direct supervisor and in management. The mediating and moderating role of trust in organization has also received much less empirical research attention than that of trust in supervisor and trust in management. It is this study’s conclusion that subordinate workplace intentions and behaviors can be better understood in terms of considering all reciprocal trust relationships among the subordinate, the supervisor, and the subordinate’s peers; between the subordinate and the management; and between the subordinate and the organization. Implications and future research directions are also discussed

Özet

Güven, çalışanın pozitif işyeri niyet ve davranışlarını artırarak örgütsel performansa katkı sağlamaktadır. Son on yılda bilimsel dergilerde yayınlanan güvenle ilgili ampirik çalışmalarda çok büyük bir artış görülmüştür. Güven imlemlerinin (referents) önemi konusunda teorik tavsiyeler ve ampirik deliller dikkate alındığında, bu mevcut çalışma, yönetici, yönetim ve organizasyon güven imlemlerini dikkate alarak ampirik güven çalışmalarını gözden geçirmiştir. Güvenle ilgili çalışmaların bu üç şekilde birbirinden ayrılması, örgütsel güven konusunun, bir üst yöneticiye güven ve yönetime güven konularından çok daha az araştırma konusu olduğunu ortaya çıkarmıştır. Örgütsel güvenin mediatör ve moderatör rolü de yöneticiye güven ve yönetime güvenin aynı konudaki rollerinden çok daha az ampirik araştırma konusu olmuştur. Astların işyeri niyet ve davranışları, astlar, bir üst yöneticileri ve astların iş arkadaşları; astlar ve yönetim; ve astlar ve organizasyon arasındaki karşılıklı güven ilişkilerinin dikkate alınması ile anlaşılabileceği bu çalışmanın sonucudur. Çalışmaların sonuçlarının ne anlama geldiği ve gelecek araştırmaların hangi yönde olması gerektiği konuları da bu çalışma içerisinde tartışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZYILMAZ, A. (2022). Örgütlerde dikey güven:Son on yıllık dönemdeki ampirik çalışmaların gözden geçirilmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13, 1–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/583095

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Aquino, K. and Byron, K. (2002). “Dominating Interpersonal Behaviour and Perceived Victimization in Groups: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship”. Journal of Management, 28, 69-87. *Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S. and Chen, Z. X. (2002). “Trust as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Work Outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 267-285.
  2. Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  3. Bensimon, H. (1997). “What to do about Anger in the Workplace”. Training and Development, 51, 28-32. *Bijlsma-Frankema, K., Jong, B. D. and Van de Bunt, G. (2008). “Heed, a Missing Link between Trust, Monitoring and Performance in Knowledge Intensive Teams”. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 19-40.
  4. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley. *Brashear, T. G., Manolis, C. and Brooks, C. M. (2005). “The Effects of Control, Trust, and Justice on Salesperson Turnover”. Journal of Business Research, 58, 241-249. *Brower, H. H., Lester, S. W., Korsgaard, M. A. and Dineen, B. R. (2009). “A Closer Look at Trust between Managers and Subordinates: Understanding the Effects of Both Trusting and Being Trusted on Subordinate Outcomes”. Journal of Management, 35, 327-347.
  5. Butler, J. K. (1999). “Trust Expectations, Information Sharing, Climate of Trust, and Nogotiation Effectiveness and Efficiency”. Group and Organization Management, 24, 217-238.
  6. Campbell, D. J. (2000). “The Proactive Employee: Managing Workplace Initiative”. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 52-66. *Casimir, G., Waldman, D. A., Bartram, T. and Yang, S. (2006). “Trust and the Relationship between Leadership and Follower Performance: Opening the Black Box in Australia and China”. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 12, 68-84.
  7. Challagalla, G. N and Shervani, T. A. (1996). “Dimensions and Types of Supervisory Control: Effects on Salesperson Performance and Satisfaction”. Journal of Marketing, 60, 89-105. *Chang, H. and Chi, N. (2007). “Human Resource Managers’ Role Consistency and HR Performance Indicators: The Moderating Effect of Interpersonal Trust in Taiwan”. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 665-683. *Chiaburu, D. S. and Byrne, Z. S. (2009). “Predicting OCB Role Definitions: Exch