SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 53

Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk ve firma performansı arasındaki ilişki : Türkiye örneği

Corporate soci al responsi bility and financial performance relati onship: The case of Turkey

Özer ARABACI
Aydem ÇİFTÇİOĞLU
Aylin ARSOY POROY
Pages
159–176
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results seem to support CSR causes better financial performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Having an increased attention from researchers corporate social responsibility is the starting point ofthis study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There several studies in the literature regarding the linkage between CSR and firm performance,however this study examines the situation of a developing country; Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results seem to support CSR causes better financial performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Having an increased attention from researchers corporate social responsibility is the starting point ofthis study. There several studies in the literature regarding the linkage between CSR and firm performance,however this study examines the situation of a developing country; Turkey. The main aim of this study is toinvestigate corporate social performance and financial performance relationship with accounting basedperformance measures. The results seem to support CSR causes better financial performance.

Özet

Son yıllarda araştırmacıların yoğun ilgisini çeken kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk bu çalışmanın başlangıçnoktasını oluşturmaktadır. Ilgili literaturde kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk ve firma performansını konu alan çeşitliaraştırmalar mevcuttur, ancak bu çalışmada gelişmekte olan bir ülkenin, Türkiyenin durumu incelenme ktedir.Bu çalışmanın ana amacı muhasebe bazlı performans ölçütleri yardımıyla kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk vefinansal performans arasındaki ilişkiyi sorgulamaktır. Çalışmada ulaşılan sonuçlar, kurumsal sosyalsorumluluğun daha iyi finansal performansa yol açtığını desteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARABACI, Ö., ÇİFTÇİOĞLU, A., POROY, A. A. (2022). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk ve firma performansı arasındaki ilişki : Türkiye örneği. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 53, 159–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/582575

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Abbott, Walter F. - Monsen Joseph R. (1979), “On The Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: Self- Reported Disclosure as a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement ”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 22, pp. 501 – 515 Anderson, J. C. - Frankle, A. W. (1980) “Voluntary Social Reporting: An Iso - Beta Portfolio Analysis ”, Accounting Review, No. 55, pp. 468- 479. Andrews K.R. (1980),
  2. The Concept of Corporate Strategy, Richard D, Irwin, Homewood, IL. Ansoff H.I.(1983), Societal Strategy For The Business Firm, Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 1, JAI Press,
  3. Greenwich, CT, 3 –29. Atabek A., (2005), “A Composite Leading Indicator for the Turkish Economic Activity.” Central Bank of The Republic of Turkey.13 Aupperle Kenneth E. - Archie B. Carroll- Hatfield John D.(1985), “ An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability”, The Academy of Management Journal,Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 446- 463 Backhaus, K. - Stone, B. - Heiner, K. (2002) “ Exploring the Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness ”, Business and Society,Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 292- 318. Berman, S. - Wicks, A. C. - Kotha, S. - Jones, T. (1999). “Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, No. 42, pp. 488- 505. Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities o f The Businessman. New York: Harper. Bowman, E. H., - Haire, M. (1975), “A Strategic Posture Toward Corporate Social Responsibility”, California Management Review, Vol. 18, No.2, pp. 49- 58. Bragdon, J. H. - Marlin, J. A. T. (1972), “Is Pollution Profitable ?”, Risk Management, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 9- 18. Cahill M. B. - Sanchez N., (2001), “Using Principal Components to Produce an Economic and Social Development Index: An Application to Latin America and the U.S. ”, Atlantic Economic Journal, Vol.29, No. 3, pp.311 – 329. Camillus J.C. - Datta D.K.(1991), “ Managing Strategic Issues in a Turbulent Environment ”,Long Range Planning, Vol. 24, No. 2,pp. 67–74. Carroll Archie B. (2000), “A Commentary and an Ovierview of Key Questions o n Corporate Social Performance”, Business & Society, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 466- 478. Carroll, Archie B. (1979). “A Three Dimensional Model o f Corporate Social Performance”, Academy of Management Review, No. 4, pp. 497- 505. Chen, Kung H. - Richard W. Metcalf (1980), “The Relationship Between Pollu