SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 61

İşletme performansının açıklanmasında işletme stratejilerinin etkisi: İstanbulborsası 100 endeksinde bir araştırma

How do business strategies predict firm performance? aninvestigation on borsa Istanbul 100 index

Yasemin ERTAN
Elif YÜCEL
Mehlika SARAÇ
Pages
121–134
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that the bestpredictor of performance (ROA) is the interaction efffect of firm size and firm strategy.Anahtar Kelimeler: Business Strategies, Miles and Snow s Strategy Typology, ROA,Logistic Regression.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study it is aimed to verify Miles and Snow s strategy typology in Turkey andinvestigate how firms that conduct different business strategies, differ in firm performanceconsidering ROA ratio.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research conducted with 190 firms listed in Borsa Istanbul 100Index.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that the bestpredictor of performance (ROA) is the interaction efffect of firm size and firm strategy.Anahtar Kelimeler: Business Strategies, Miles and Snow s Strategy Typology, ROA,Logistic Regression.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study it is aimed to verify Miles and Snow s strategy typology in Turkey andinvestigate how firms that conduct different business strategies, differ in firm performanceconsidering ROA ratio. Research conducted with 190 firms listed in Borsa Istanbul 100Index. Firms classified under 3 strategy typology with cluster analysis. The impact ofindependent variables ; firm strategy , industry and firm sizeon firm performance(ROA) were analysed by ANOVA and logistic regression. Results indicated that the bestpredictor of performance (ROA) is the interaction efffect of firm size and firm strategy.Anahtar Kelimeler: Business Strategies, Miles and Snow s Strategy Typology, ROA,Logistic Regression.

Özet

Bu çalışmada amaçlanan Miles ve Snowun strateji tipolojisinin Türkiyede birsınamasını gerçekleştirmek ve farklı stratejiler uygulayan firmaların ROA oranlarına görefirma performanları açısından nasıl farklılaştıklarını araştırmaktır. Çalışma Borsa İstanbul100 endeksinde listelenen 190 firma üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Firmalar kümeleme analiziyardımıyla 3 strateji tipolojisi altında gruplandırılmıştır. Bağımsız deği şkenler olarak seçilen Firma stratejisi , firma büyüklüğü ve sektör ün firma performansı (ROA) üzerindekietkisi ANOVA ve Lojistik regresyon yöntemleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar firmaperformansının (ROA) en iyi açıklayıcısının firma stratejisi ve firma büyüklüğünün etkileşimi olduğuna dikkat çekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTAN, Y., YÜCEL, E., SARAÇ, M. (2022). İşletme performansının açıklanmasında işletme stratejilerinin etkisi: İstanbulborsası 100 endeksinde bir araştırma. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 61, 121–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/582535

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ansoff, I.(1965), Corporate strategy. New York: McGraw Hill. Barney J.B. (1991), “The resource-based view of strategy: Origins, implications, and prospects,” Journal of Management, Vol.17, pp. 97-211.
  2. Bentley, K.A- Omer, T.C.- Sharp, N.Y., (2013).
  3. Business Strategy, Financial Reporting Irregularities, and Audit Effort. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 780-817.
  4. Conant JS- Mokwa MP- Varadarajan PR.(1990),
  5. Strategic Types, Distinctive Marketing Competencies and Organizational Performance: A Multiple Measures- Based Study, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 365-383. Desarbo,W.S.- Benedetto, C. A.- Song, M.- Sinha, I. (2005). Revisiting The Miles And Snow Strategic Framework: Uncovering Interrelationships Between Strategic Types, Capabilities, Environmental Uncertainty, And Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 47-74.
  6. Fiss, P.C (2011). Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach To Typologies in Organization Research, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 54, No.2, pp. 393–420 Hambrick DC (1983) Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow’s strategic types. Academy of Management Journal, No. 26, pp. 5–26. Hambrick DC (2003) On the staying power of defenders, analysers, and prospectors. Academy of ManagementExecutive, No. 17, pp.115–118. Ittner, C. D.- D. F. Larcker- M. V. Rajan. 1997. The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts. The Accounting Review, Vol. 72, No. 2, pp. 231-255.
  7. Karabağ, S.Filiz, (2008), Strateji Ve Endüstrinin Firma Performansına Etkisi: Türkiye’nin Öncü Sanayi İş letmeleri Üzerine Bir Araş tırma, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana. Karen Blackmor- Keith Nesbitt, (2012), Verifying the Miles and Snow strategy types in Australian smalland medium-size enterprises, Australian Journal of Management. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0312896212444692, pp. 1-20 134Levinthal D. (1995), “Strategic management and the exploration of diversity,” Montgomery C. (Ed.), Resource-Base and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Toward a Synthesis, Boston, MA: Kluwer,pp. 19-42.
  8. Miles RE- Snow CC (1978)
  9. Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill. Miles R.E.- Snow C.C.- Meyer A.D., Cohleman H.C. (1978) Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, No. 3, pp. 546–562. Miller D, Friesen PH. 1978. Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science, Vol.