Journals / Mugla Journal of Science and Technology / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

CLASSIFICATION OF GALAXIES IN SHAPLEY CONCENTRATION REGION WITH MACHINE LEARNING

MAKİNE ÖĞRENİMİ İLE SHAPLEY KONSANTRASYON BÖLGESİNDE GALAKSİLERİN SINIFLANDIRILMASI

Pages
119–126
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The obtained classification results were compared with the natural groups and thepredictive performance of the methods were evaluated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The galaxies, are the systems consisting of stars, gas, dust and dark matter combined with the gravitational force.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study has been classified five-variables (Right ascension, Declination, Magnitude,Velocity, and Sigma of Velocity) of 4215 galaxies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The obtained classification results were compared with the natural groups and thepredictive performance of the methods were evaluated.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The galaxies, are the systems consisting of stars, gas, dust and dark matter combined with the gravitational force. Thereare billions of galaxies in the universe. Since the cost of examining each galaxy one by one is high, the classification of thegalaxy is an important part of the astronomical data analysis. Galaxies are classified according to their morphologies andspectral properties. Machine learning methods aiming the revealing of hidden pattern within the data set by analyzing theavailable data, can be used to estimate unidentified natural groups of galaxies. This will save time and cost for bothresearchers and astronomers. This study has been classified five-variables (Right ascension, Declination, Magnitude,Velocity, and Sigma of Velocity) of 4215 galaxies. Galaxies whose natural groups were determined with IDL were classifiedby using machine learning algorithms with Weka program. Bayes classifier methods, Naive Bayes and Bayes net, Decisiontree methods J48, LMT and Random Forest algorithms, Artificial Neural Networks Multilayer Perceptron and Supportvector classifier methods were used. The obtained classification results were compared with the natural groups and thepredictive performance of the methods were evaluated.

Özet

Galaksiler, kütle çekim kuvvetiyle bir arada bulunan yıldızlar, gaz, toz ve karanlık maddeden meydana gelen sistemlerdir. Evrende milyarlarca galaksi bulunmaktadır. Her bir galaksinin tek tek incelenmesinin maliyeti yüksek olduğundan galaksi sınıflandırması astronomik veri analizinde önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Galaksiler morfolojilerine ve spektral özelliklerine göre sınıflandırılmaktadır. Veri seti içindeki gizli örüntüyü ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlayan makine öğrenme yöntemleri mevcut veriyi analiz ederek doğal grupları henüz tespit edilmemiş olan galaksilerin hangi gruba ait olduğunu tahmin etmek amacıyla kullanılabilir. Bu da gerek araştırmacılara gerekse astronomlara zaman ve maliyet açısından kazanç sağlayacaktır. Bu çalışma da Shapley Konsantrasyon bölgesindeki 4215 galaksi, 5 değişken (enlem, boylam, parlaklık, hız ve hızdaki sapma) dikkate alınarak sınıflandırılmıştır. IDL programlama ile doğal grupları tespit edilen galaksiler Weka programı ile makine öğrenme algoritmaları kullanılarak sınıflandırılmıştır. Bayes Sınıflandırıcı yöntemlerinden Naive Bayes ve Bayes net, Karar Ağaçları yöntemlerinden J48, LMT ve Random Forest algoritmaları, Yapay Sinir Ağlarından Çok Katmanlı Algılayıcılar ve Destek Vektör sınıflandırıcı yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen sınıflandırma sonuçları doğal gruplarla karşılaştırılmış ve yöntemlerin tahmin performansları değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜÇ, N. D., NARİN, N. G. (2022). CLASSIFICATION OF GALAXIES IN SHAPLEY CONCENTRATION REGION WITH MACHINE LEARNING. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 119–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/581946

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Hubble E., “Extra-galactic Nebulae”, Contributions from the Mount Wilson Observatory Astrophysical Journal, Vol. LXIV, No.324, pp.321-369,1926
  2. Vaucouleurs, G. D., “Classification and Morphology of External Galaxies”, Handbuch der Physik, Vol.11 No.53, pp. 275-310, 1959
  3. Sandage, A., “Hubble Atlas of Galaxies”, Vol. 618, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington D.C, 1961
  4. Lotz J.M., Primack J, and Madau P., “A New Nonparametric Approach to Galaxy Morphological Classıification”, the Astronomical Journal, Vol.128, No.1, pp. 163–182, 2004
  5. Dressler, A., “A Catalog of Morphological Types In 55 Rich Clusters Of Galaxies”, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 42, pp. 565-609, 1979
  6. Kasivajhula S., Raghavan N. and Shah H., “Morphological Galaxy Classification Using Machine Learning” cs229.stanford.edu, 2007
  7. Marin M., “A Hierarchical Model for Morphological Galaxy Classification”, Proceedings of the Twenty- Sixth International FLAIRS Conference, 2013, Florida, USA
  8. Miller A. S. and Coe M. J., “Star/Galaxy Classification Using Kohonen Self-Organizing Maps”, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Vol. 279, pp. 293-300, 1996
  9. Bailin J. and Harris W.E., “Inclination-Independent Galaxy Classification”, The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 681, pp. 225-231, 2008
  10. Gauci A., Kristian Zarb Adami K.Z. and Abela J., “Machine Learning for Galaxy Morphology Classification”, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., Vol. 000, 1– 8, arXiv preprint arXiv:1005.0390, 2010
  11. Gauthier A., Archa Jain A. and Emil Noordeh E., “Galaxy Morphology Classification”, Lecture Notes, Stanford University, 16 December,2016
  12. D.V. Dobrycheva, I. B. Vavilova,, O. V., Melnyk, and A. A, Elyiv, “Machine learning technique for morphological classification of galaxies at z [13] Remya G. and Mohan A., “Deep Learning Approach for Classifying Galaxies”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, Vol. 6, Issue 4, April 2016
  13. Selim, I., Keshk, A. E., & El Shourbugy, B. M. Galaxy image classification using non-negative matrix factorization. International Journal of Computer Applications, 137(5), 4-8, 2016
  14. Z.Frei and J.E.Gun,” A Catalog Of Digital Images Of 113 Nearby Galaxıes” Astrophysics and Space Science, Volume 269, Issue 0, pp 649–650, 1999
  15. Goderya N.S. and Lolling S.M., “Morphological classification of Galaxies Using Computer Vision and Artificial Neural Networks: A Computational scheme”, Astrophysics and Space