SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mugla Journal of Science and Technology / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

CLASSIFICATION OF GALAXIES IN SHAPLEY CONCENTRATION REGION WITH MACHINE LEARNING

Nazlı Deniz ERGÜÇ
Nida GÖKÇE NARİN
Pages
119–126
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The obtained classification results were compared with the natural groups and the predictive performance of the methods were evaluated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The galaxies, are the systems consisting of stars, gas, dust and dark matter combined with the gravitational force.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study has been classified five-variables (Right ascension, Declination, Magnitude, Velocity, and Sigma of Velocity) 4215 galaxies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The obtained classification results were compared with the natural groups and the predictive performance of the methods were evaluated.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Galaxies Classification · Classification Algorithms · Machine Learning

Abstract

The galaxies, are the systems consisting of stars, gas, dust and dark matter combined with the gravitational force. There are billions of galaxies in the universe. Since the cost of examining each galaxy one by one is high, the classification of the galaxy is an important part of the astronomical data analysis. Galaxies are classified according to morphology and spectral properties. Machine learning methods aimed at revealing the hidden pattern within the data set by analyzing the available data, it can be used to estimate which group of galaxies whose natural groups have not yet been identified. This will save time and cost for both researchers and astronomers. This study has been classified five-variables (Right ascension, Declination, Magnitude, Velocity, and Sigma of Velocity) 4215 galaxies. Galaxies whose natural groups were determined with IDL were classified by using machine learning algorithms with Weka program. Bayes classifier methods, Naive Bayes and Bayes net, Decision tree methods J48, LMT and Random Forest algorithms, Artificial Neural Networks Multilayer Perceptron and Support vector classifier methods were used. The obtained classification results were compared with the natural groups and the predictive performance of the methods were evaluated.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜÇ, N. D., NARİN, N. G. (2019). CLASSIFICATION OF GALAXIES IN SHAPLEY CONCENTRATION REGION WITH MACHINE LEARNING. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 119–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/293949

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Hubble E., “Extra-galactic Nebulae”, Contributions from the Mount Wilson Observatory / Carnegie Institution of Washington, Vol. LXIV, No.324, pp.321-369,1926.
  2. Vaucouleurs, G. D., “Classification and Morphology of External Galaxies”, Handbuch der Physik, Vol.11 No.53, pp. 275-310, 1959.
  3. Sandage, A., “Hubble Atlas of Galaxies”, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington D.C,618,A.B.D, 1961.
  4. Lotz J.M., Primack J, and Madau P., “A New Nonparametrıc Approach to Galaxy Morphologıcal Classıfıcatıon”, the Astronomical Journal, Vol.128, No.1, pp. 163–182, 2004. Dressler, “A Catalog of Morphologıcal Types In 55 Rıch Clusters Of Galaxıes”, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 42, pp. 565-609, 1979.
  5. Kasivajhula S., Raghavan N. and Shah H., “Morphological Galaxy Classification Using Machine Learning” cs229.stanford.edu, 2007. Marin M., “A Hierarchical Model for Morphological Galaxy Classification”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International FLAIRS Conference, Florida, USA 2013. Miller A. S. and Coe M. J., ”Star/Galaxy Classification Using Kohonen Self-Organizing Maps”, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 279, pp. 293-300, 1996. Bailin J. ve Harris W.E., “Inclination-Independent Galaxy Classification”, The Astrophysical Journal, 681, pp. 225-231, 2008.
  6. Gauci A., Kristian Zarb Adami K.Z. and Abela J., “Machine Learning for Galaxy Morphology Classification”, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 000, 1–8, 2010.
  7. Gauthier A., Archa Jain A. and Emil Noordeh E., ”Galaxy Morphology Classification”, Stanford University, 2016. D.V. Dobrycheva, “Machine learning technique for morphological classification of galaxies at z Remya G. and Mohan A.,”Deep Learning Approach for Classifying Galaxies”, Volume 6, Issue 4, April 2016. [14] Selim I.M., Keshk A.E. and El Shourbugy B.S., “Galaxy Image Classification using Non-Negative Matrix Factorization”, International Journal of Computer Applications · March 2016.
  8. Selim, I., Keshk, A. E., & El Shourbugy, B. M. Galaxy image classification using non-negative matrix factorization. International Journal of Computer Applications, 137(5), 4-8, 2016. Z.Frei and J.E.Gun,” A Catalog Of Digital Images Of 113 Nearby Galaxıes” Astrophysics and Space Science, Volume 269, Issue 0, pp 649–650, 1999. Goderya N.S. and Lolling S.M.,, “Morphological classification of Galaxies Using Computer Vision and Artificial Neural Networks: A Computational scheme”, Astrophysics and Space Science 279: 377–387, 2002.
  9. Abell, G. O., “The Distribution of rich clusters of galaxies”, The