Journals / MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 17

Refusing Into-Nation: An Inquiry about Voice, Politics and Resistance

Entonasyon’u Reddediş: Ses, Politika ve Direniş Üzerine bir İnceleme

Pages
68–78
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The paper also aims to reflectupon the risks and limits of this form of sensory political behavior.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper is an exercise to understand the correlation between subjects’ political inclinationsand their aesthetic judgments concerning the voice of a political leader.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Taking a particular speech of the President from 2014where his voice cracked as a case study, the paper claims that the choice of listening to his voiceor not, or finding it unpleasant can be read as forms of resistance that are in fact related to theissue of belongingness to a particular representation of the nation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The paper also aims to reflectupon the risks and limits of this form of sensory political behavior.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper is an exercise to understand the correlation between subjects’ political inclinationsand their aesthetic judgments concerning the voice of a political leader. In this vein, thepaper aims to expand on the dynamics behind the negative comments about the aesthetic valueof the voice of Turkey’s current President. Taking a particular speech of the President from 2014where his voice cracked as a case study, the paper claims that the choice of listening to his voiceor not, or finding it unpleasant can be read as forms of resistance that are in fact related to theissue of belongingness to a particular representation of the nation. The paper also aims to reflectupon the risks and limits of this form of sensory political behavior.

Özet

Bu makale politik liderlerin seslerine dair estetik yargılar ile politik eğilimler arasındaki ilişkilenmeleri araştırmaktadır. Makale bu bağlamda Türkiye Cumhurbaşkanı’nın 2014’te sesinin kısıldığı Van konuşmasına verilen tepkileri de göz önünde bulundurarak, sesinin estetik değeri hakkında yapılan olumsuz yorumların arkasındaki dinamikleri anlamlandırmayı hedeflemektedir. Cumhurbaşkanı’nın sesine verilen tepkilerin, -özellikle dinlemek, dinlememek ya da rahatsız edici bulmak gibi- belirli bir ulus temsiliyetine ait olup olmama hissiyatını ele veren direniş biçimleri olduğunu öne süren makale ayrıca bu tarz duyusal politik tepkilerin tehlikelerini ve sınırlarını ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDEMİR, E. (2022). Refusing Into-Nation: An Inquiry about Voice, Politics and Resistance. MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 17, 68–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/581847

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akinerdem, F. ve Sirman, N. (2017). Melodram ve Oyun: Tehlikeli Oyunlar ve Poyraz Karayel'de Bir Temsiliyet Rejimi Sorunsalı. Monograf, 7, 212-245.
  2. Benjamin, W. (1969). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp.217-252).
  3. New York, NY: Schocken Books. Carson, A. (2015).
  4. Sesin Cinsiyeti. İstanbul, Türkiye: Nod Yayınları.
  5. Cavarero, A. (2005). For More than One Voice: Toward a Philosophy of Vocal Expression. Stanford, USA: Stanford University Press.
  6. Dolar, M. (1996). The Object Voice. In S. Žižek & R. Salecl (Eds.), Gaze and Voice as Love Objects (pp.7-31). Durham: Duke University Press.
  7. Dolar, M. (2006).
  8. A Voice and Nothing More. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Educatedear]. (2014, April 4). Uzun Adam (Educatedear Remix) [Video File]. Retrieved from www.youtube.com/watch?v=26b0NV5WHKY. Falasca-Zamponi, S. (1997). Fascist Spectacle: The Aesthetics of Power in Mussolini's Italy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  9. Leppert, R. (2005). Music ‘Pushed to the Edge of Existence’ (Adorno, Listening, and The Question of Hope). Cultural Critique, 60, 251-78. doi:10.1353/cul.2005.0022 Redfield, M. (2003). The Politics of Aesthetics: Nationalism, Gender, Romanticism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  10. Schlichter, A. (2011). Do Voices Matter? Vocality, Materiality, Gender Performativity. Body & Society, 17(1), 31-52. doi:10.1177/1357034x10394669. Zarzycka, M. (2013). Showing Sounds: Listening to War Photographs. In B. Papenburg & M. Zarzycka (Eds.) Carnal Aesthetics: Transgressive Imagery and Feminist Politics London & New York: I.B.Tauris.