SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Milli Eğitim / 2007 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 174

The Reflection of Class Management Changing with the New Curriculum to Teacher Behaviours

Yeni Müfredatla Birlikte Değişen Sınıf Yönetiminin Öğretmen Davranışlarına Yansıması

Nida BAYINDIR
Vahap ÖZPOLAT
Pages
8–17
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The result have shown that the teacher'S behaviors change on the new curriculum practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, the new curriculum with the view of teacher's behav­iors providing classroom management in primary schools, was tried to emp­hasized.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was car­ried out with-a sample of 349 teachers teaching in those schools in Istanbul dur­ing the academic,years of 2006-2007.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The result have shown that the teacher'S behaviors change on the new curriculum practice.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2006-2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this research, the new curriculum with the view of teacher's behav­iors providing classroom management in primary schools, was tried to emp­hasized. The aim of this research is to find out the effective teaching behaviors known and used by the teachers working in primary schools on the new cur­riculum. Survey method has been used in this research. The research was car­ried out with-a sample of 349 teachers teaching in those schools in Istanbul dur­ing the academic,years of 2006-2007. Frequency, means, One a way analysis of variance, chil square was used to analyze data. The result have shown that the teacher'S behaviors change on the new curriculum practice.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, ilköğretim okullarında yeni müfredatın uygulanması ile sınıf yönetiminin sağlanmasına yönelik öğretmen davranışları belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırmanın amacı; öğretmenlerin yeni müfredatla yeni bir şekil alan sınıf yönetimi değişkenleri karşısında sergileyecekleri davranışları konu­sundaki bilgileri ve bu bilgileri uygulama düzeylerini belirlemektir. Araştırma­da tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırma, 2006-2007 öğretim yılında İstan­bul'daki ilköğretim okullarında görev yapan 180 sınıf, 169 branş öğretmeninin anket aracılığıyla görüşleri alınarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Toplanan veriler, fre­kans, ortalama ve ki-kare kullanılarak çözümlenmiştir. Araştırmada; öğretmen­lerin, yeni müfredatla farklılaşan sınıf yönetim değişkenlerini algılayışlarının farklılaştığı ve sınıf öğretmenlerinin yeni müfredata göre sınıf yönetim değiş­kenlerini daha iyi anladıkları ve anlamlandırdıkları sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYINDIR, N., ÖZPOLAT, V. (2022). The Reflection of Class Management Changing with the New Curriculum to Teacher Behaviours. Milli Eğitim, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 174, 8–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/581156

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. AYDIN, Ayhan, (1998).
  2. Sınıf Yönetimi, Anı yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  3. BROOKS, G., Jacqueline, BROOKS, G., Martin, (1999). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. ASCD, Inc., Virginia. BROPHY,J., Homes, ALLEMAN, Janet, (2003). Primary-Grade Students Knowledge and Thin­king About the Supply of Utilities. Cognition and Instruction, 21, (19 79-112.
  4. HENDERSON, Penny, (1989). Promoting Active Learning. National Extension College Publis­hed, Inc., Cambridge. HOWE,J., Michael, (2001).
  5. Öğrenme Psikolojisi. Çev. Ebru Kılıç, Alfa Yayınları/İstanbul.
  6. JONES, M., Gail, CARTER,. Glenda, RUA, J., Melissa, (1999). Children's Concepts: Tools For. Transforming Science Teachers Knowledge. Science Education, 83, (5) 545-557.
  7. KNOWLES J., Gary, HOLT-REYNOLDS, Diane, (1991). Shaping Pedagogies Through Personal Histrories in Preservice Teacher Education. Teachers College Record, 93 (1) 87-113.
  8. LATZ, M. (1992). Preservice teachers perceptions and concerns about classroom Management and discipline: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3 (1), 1-4.
  9. LEMLECH, Kasin J., (1988).
  10. Classroom Management, Longman Press,
  11. Newyork. MACRAE, Sheila, (1998). Classroom Management and Organization, Becoming a Teacher, (Ed.)Justin Dillon. M.Maguire. Open University Press,
  12. Newyork. MAYER, E., Richard, (1992). Cognition and Instruction: Their Historic Meeting within Educational Psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, (4). 405-412.
  13. PRESSLEY, Michael, HARRIS, R., Karen, GUTHRIE, T., John, (1992). Promoting Academic Com­petence and Litaracy in School. Academic Press,
  14. Inc., California. QUALTER, Anne, (1996). Differentiated Primary Science. Open University Press,
  15. Inc., Bucking­ham. RESNICK, B., Lauren, (1989).
  16. Knowing, Learning, and Instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum As­sociates Publishers,
  17. Inc., Newjersey. ROBINSON, Ken, (2003).
  18. Yaratıcılık, Aklın Sınırlarını Aşmak. Çev. Nihal, G. Koldaş, Kitap Yayınevi,
  19. İstanbul.
  20. Sanford, J.P., Clements, B.S., Emmer, E.T. (1983).
  21. Improving classroom Management, Educational Leadership, 40, 56-61.
  22. SCHMECK, R., Ronald, (1988). Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. Plenum Press,
  23. New-York. STERNBERG, J., Robert, (1994).
  24. Comments on Multiple Intelligences, The Theory in Practice. Teachers College Record, 95, (4) 561-569.
  25. WADE, E., Suzanne, TRATHEN, Woodrow, (1989). Effect of Self-Selected Study Methods on Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, (1) 40-47. WATERHAUSE R., (1990).
  26. Classroom Management, Educationa