Journals / Medicine Science / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Real-life risk factors of inadequate procedure prior to colonoscopy in a Turkish population

Pages
36–40
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is recommended to re-evaluate ineffective colonoscopy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Colonoscopy is one of the main diagnostic tools for symptoms related to the colon and colorectal cancer screening programs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Only 79.1% of colonoscopy were assessed as adequate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is recommended to re-evaluate ineffective colonoscopy.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Colonoscopy is one of the main diagnostic tools for symptoms related to the colon and colorectal cancer screening programs. Inadequate cleansing of colonoscopy leads to misdiagnosis of adenomas. It is recommended to re-evaluate ineffective colonoscopy. It is of utmost importance to predict whether the bowel is clean or not because the procedure is expensive, invasive and time- consuming. This study aimed to identify the risk factors of inadequate bowel preparation. The consecutive two hundred and fifty-three patients who were referred for colonoscopy were enrolled into the study. The demographic and clinical data were obtained using a questionnaire. Only 79.1% of colonoscopy were assessed as adequate. In the univariate analysis; adherence to protocol, older age, consuming high-fiber diet in last two days, number of days of low residue diet, consumed all laxative, consumed 1.5 L water after laxative usage, regular diet for dinner before the day of colonoscopy, amount of water consumed before the day of colonoscopy, amount of water consumed in the morning of the day of colonoscopy, fasting status in the morning of the CD, and were found significantly relevant for adequate bowel preparation. Older age, number of days of low residue diet, consuming high-fiber diet in last two days, regular diet for the dinner before the day of colonoscopy, not Consumed all laxatives were independent risk factors for inadequate colonoscopy. These factors are reversible risk factors except older age. Increasing the adherence to the protocol with education seems to improve the bowel preparation quality.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNAY, S., YENİOVA, A. O., AKGÜL, G., YENİDOĞAN, E. (2022). Real-life risk factors of inadequate procedure prior to colonoscopy in a Turkish population. Medicine Science, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 36–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/579608

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Millien VO, Mansour NM. Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in 2020: A Look at the Past, Present, and Future. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020;22:28
  2. Dong SH, Huang JQ, Chen JS. Interval colorectal cancer: a challenging field in colorectal cancer. Future Onco. 2018;14:1307-16
  3. Teixeira C, Martins C, Dantas E, et al. Interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopy. Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico. 2019;84:284-9
  4. Mahmood S, Farooqui SM, Madhoun MF. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;30:819-26
  5. Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Baute JL, Hernandez G, et al. Risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation: a validated predictive score. Endoscopy. 2017;49:536-43
  6. Hassan C, Fuccio L, Bruno M, et al. A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:501-6
  7. Chan WK, Saravanan A, Manikam J, et al. Appointment waiting times and education level influence the quality of bowel preparation in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:86
  8. Yenidogan E, Okan I, Kayaoglu HA, et al. Same-day colonoscopy preparation with Senna alkaloids and bisacodyl tablets: a pilot study. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:15382-6
  9. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:620-5
  10. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1296-308
  11. Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Robinson CM, et al. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparationquality rating. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:463-70
  12. Dik VK, Moons LM, Huyuk M, et al. Predicting inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in participants receiving split-dose bowel preparation: development and validation of a prediction score. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:665-72
  13. Abou Fadel CG, Shayto RH, Sharara AI. Optimizing Colonoscopy Quality: From Bowel Preparation to Surveillance. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2016;14:115-27
  14. Bechtold ML, Mir F, Puli SR, Nguyen DL. Optimizing