Journals / Medicine Science / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of possible telehealth scenarios in Turkey by family medicine residents in Izmir

Pages
280–284
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We concluded that most physicians were aware of telemedicine and they wanted the scenarios to be implemented in common practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to evaluate the socio-demographic characteristics of the family medicine residents in Izmir, their thoughts on telehealth and possible scenarios on this topic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It aims to find a correlation between these variables and to increase awareness of telehealth. 158 physicians, who were doing their family medicine residencies in training & research hospitals and university hospitals in Izmir, took part in our cross-sectional study by answering an online survey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We concluded that most physicians were aware of telemedicine and they wanted the scenarios to be implemented in common practice.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the socio-demographic characteristics of the family medicine residents in Izmir, their thoughts on telehealth and possible scenarios on this topic. It aims to find a correlation between these variables and to increase awareness of telehealth. 158 physicians, who were doing their family medicine residencies in training & research hospitals and university hospitals in Izmir, took part in our cross-sectional study by answering an online survey. After informing the participants of the study's details, we obtained an informed consent from each volunteer. We applied the survey on socio-demographic and general information about telehealth, which we prepared in alignment with the relevant literature. The participants went through fictionalized scenarios and their input was recorded. 48.1% of the participants were female, 51.9% were male, and the mean age was 28.82±4.53. 76.6% of the participants stated they had heard of telehealth before. According to the replies, radiology was the most common area of telehealth applications with 84.8%, and the telehealth target group was physically disabled with 81.0%. The approval rate of the most accepted scenario was 98.1% (Screening Notification). While the most common benefit of the scenarios was increased access to health care, the most common obstacle was technical prerequisites. We concluded that most physicians were aware of telemedicine and they wanted the scenarios to be implemented in common practice. They stated that they can adapt to scenarios higher than patients. Considering the willingness of physicians to implement telehealth practices, the necessary studies and regulations about telehealth should gain momentum in our country.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOÇ, E. M., PAMUK, G., ERBAYRAKTAR, A. (2022). Evaluation of possible telehealth scenarios in Turkey by family medicine residents in Izmir. Medicine Science, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 280–284. https://ajindex.com/articles/579572

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. İlbaz BD, Aplanoglu MK, Kaplanoglu DK. Telemedicine and Telehealth: Past, Today and Future. EHTA Eurasian J Heal Technol Assess. 2020:40–56
  2. N Romesh Wijesooriya, Vimal M, Paul LP, Brand BKR. COVID-19 and telehealth, education, and research adaptations. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020:38–42
  3. Miller EA. Solving the disjuncture between research and practice: Telehealth trends in the 21st century. Health Policy (New York). 2007:133– 41
  4. Telehealth Basics – ATA. https://www.americantelemed.org/resource/whytelemedicine. access date: 02.10.2021 5. Telemedicine: Opportunities and developments in member states. Vol. 2, WHO Global Observatory for eHealth Series. 2010. https://apps.who.int/ iris/handle/10665/44497 access date: 02.08.2021 6. Haluza D, Jungwirth D. ICT and the future of health care: Aspects of health promotion. Int J Med Inform. 2015:48–57
  5. Pehlivan O, Kıyan A. Evaluation by Primary Healthcare Providers of Potential Telehealth Scenarios in Turkey, Bolu Example (Master Thesis). Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu. 2020 8. Kissi J, Dai B, Dogbe CSK, et al. Predictive factors of physicians’ satisfaction with telemedicine services acceptance. Health Informatics J. 2020:1866–80
  6. Kim JE, Song YM, Park JH, et al. Attitude of korean primary care family physicians towards telehealth. Korean J Fam Med. 2011:341–51
  7. Wernhart A, Gahbauer Id S, Haluza Id D. eHealth and telemedicine: Practices and beliefs among healthcare professionals and medical students at a medical university. PLoS One. 2019:1–13
  8. Darkins A, Ryan P, Kobb R, et al. Care coordination/home telehealth: The systematic implementation of health informatics, home telehealth, and disease management to support the care of veteran patients with chronic conditions. Telemed e-Health. 2008:1118–26
  9. Dittmar R, Wohlgemuth WA, Nagel E. Potenziale und barrieren der telemedizin in der regelversorgung. Gesundh und Gesellschaft Wiss. 2009:16–26
  10. Olson CA, Thomas JF. Telehealth: No longer an idea for the future. Adv Pediatr. 2017:347–70
  11. Uses of Telehealth during COVID-19 in Low Resource Non-U.S. Settings CDC
  12. Jungwirth D, Haluza D. Information and communication technology and the future of healthcare: Results of a multi-scenario Delphi survey. Health Informatics J. 2019:161–73
  13. Liaw WR, Jetty A, Coffman M, et al. Disconnected: A survey of users and nonusers of telehealth and their use of primary care. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2019:420–8
  14. Polinski JM, Barker T, Gaglian