SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Medeniyet Medical Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

How to Utilize CAT and mMRC Scores to Assess Symptom Status of Patients with COPD in Clinical Practice?

Klinikte KOAH Hastalarının Semptom Durumlarını Değerlendirmede CAT ve mMRC Skorlarını Nasıl Kullanmalı?

Esra ERTAN YAZAR
Mesut BAYRAKTAROGLU
Elif Yelda NIKSARLIOGLU
Burcu YIGITBAS
Pages
173–179
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A strong positive correlation was detected between CAT and mMRC (r=0.60, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the compatibility of modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) and COPD assessment test (CAT) scores of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in terms of evaluation of their symptom status.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Statistically four separate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of CAT scoring were generated for mMRC scores of 1 to 4.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A strong positive correlation was detected between CAT and mMRC (r=0.60, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the compatibility of modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) and COPD assessment test (CAT) scores of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in terms of evaluation of their symptom status. Methods: The study was planned as a single-center, cross-sectional study. Statistically four separate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of CAT scoring were generated for mMRC scores of 1 to 4. Results: Two hundred twenty eight patients with stable COPD, mean age 64.2±8.2 and 88.6% male were included. A strong positive correlation was detected between CAT and mMRC (r=0.60, p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada kronik obstrüktif akciğer hastalığı (KOAH) hastalarının semptom durumlarını değerlendirme bakımından, modifiye Tıbbi Araştırma Konseyi (mMRC) ve KOAH değerlendirme testi (CAT) skorlarının uyumluluğunu araştırmayı amaçladık. Yöntemler: Tek merkezli kesitsel bir çalışma olarak planlandı. İstatistiksel olarak birden dörde kadar olan mMRC skorları için dört ayrı CAT skorlaması alıcı işlem karakteristikleri (ROC) eğrisi üretildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya ortalama yaşı 64,2±8,2 yıl olan ve %88,6’sı erkek 228 stabil KOAH hastası dahil edildi. CAT ve mMRc skorları arasında güçlü pozitif bir ilişki saptandı (r=0,60, p

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZAR, E. E., BAYRAKTAROGLU, M., NIKSARLIOGLU, E. Y., YIGITBAS, B. (2022). How to Utilize CAT and mMRC Scores to Assess Symptom Status of Patients with COPD in Clinical Practice?. Medeniyet Medical Journal, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 173–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/579127

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Agustí A, Vestbo J. Current controversies and future perspectives in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:507-13
  2. Vestbo J, Hurd SS, Agusti AG, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:347-65
  3. Miravitlles M, Ribera A. Understanding the impact of symptoms on the burden of COPD. Respir Res. 2017;18:67
  4. Parshall MB, Schwartzstein RM, Adams L, et al. An official American Thoracic Society statement: update on the mechanisms, assessment, and management of dyspnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:435-52
  5. Mahle DA, Wells CK. Evaluation of clinical methods for rating dyspnoea. Chest. 1988;93: 580-6
  6. Han MK, Muellerova H, Curran-Everett D, et al. GOLD 2011 disease severity classification in COPDGene: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1:43-50
  7. Jones PW. Health status measurement in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2001;56:880-7
  8. Burgel PR, Nesme-Meyer P, Chanez P, et al. Cough and sputum production are associated with frequent exacerbations and hospitalizations in COPD subjects. Chest. 2009;135:975-82
  9. Jones PW, Harding G, Berry P, Wiklund I, Chen WH, Kline Leidy N. Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test. Eur Respir J. 2009;34:648-54
  10. Jones PW, Brusselle G, Dal Negro RW, et al. Properties of the COPD assessment test in a cross-sectional European study. Eur Respir J. 2011;38:29-35
  11. Jones PW, Tabberer M, Chen WH. Creating scenarios of the impact of COPD and their relationship to COPD Assessment Test (CAT™) scores. BMC Pulm Med. 2011;11:42
  12. Rhee CK, Kim JW, Hwang YI, et al. Discrepancies between modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score and COPD assessment test score in patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015;10:1623-31
  13. Kim S, Oh J, Kim YI, et al. Differences in Classification of COPD group using COPD assessment test (CAT) or modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores: a cross-sectional analyses. BMC Pulm Med. 2013;13:35
  14. Rieger-Reyes C, García-Tirado FJ, Rubio-Galán FJ, Marín-Trigo JM. Classification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity according to the new Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2011 guidelines: COPD assessment test versus modified Medical Research Council scale. Arch Bronconeumol. 2014;50:129-34
  15. Rabe KF, Hurd S,