Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

The Comparison of Different Dimension Reduction and Classification Methods in Electroencephalogram Signals

Elektroensefalografi Sinyallerinde Farklı Boyut Indirgeme ve Sınıflandırma Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
336–344
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Results showed that SVM was a powerful tool in classifying EEG signals if it's normal or epileptic.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals have been broadly utilized for the diagnosis of epilepsy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, classification performances of support vector machine (SVM) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA), which are widely used in computer supported epilepsy diagnosis, were compared by using wavelet-based features of extracted from EEG signals which were derived in either normal or inter-ictal periods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Results showed that SVM was a powerful tool in classifying EEG signals if it's normal or epileptic.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals have been broadly utilized for the diagnosis of epilepsy. Expert physicians must monitor long-term EEG signals that is sometimes difficult and time consuming process for epilepsy diagnosis. In this study, classification performances of support vector machine (SVM) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA), which are widely used in computer supported epilepsy diagnosis, were compared by using wavelet-based features of extracted from EEG signals which were derived in either normal or inter-ictal periods. In addition, principal component analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA) were used to determine the effects of dimension reduction on classification success. Materials and Methods: The EEG data were sampled from the EEG laboratory of the Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology in Adnan Menderes University. Study was approved by Local Ethics Committee with protocol number 2016/873. Ten patients with epilepsy and 10 normal were the study group. EEG signals of patients with epilepsy were contains only seizure free- epochs. EEG signals were first decomposed into frequency sub-bands by using discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and then some statistical features were calculated from those to classify it's as normal or epileptic. Results: In classification of the EEG signals, it's as normal or epileptic, we achieved 88.9% accuracy rate using SVM with radial basis function (RBF) kernel without dimension reduction. Conclusion: Results showed that SVM was a powerful tool in classifying EEG signals if it's normal or epileptic.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, epileptik ve epileptik olmayan elektroensefalografi (EEG) sinyallerinden elde edilen özniteliklerin boyutlarının temel bileşenler analizi ve bağımsız bileşenler analizi yöntemleri ile indirgenmesinin sınıflandırma başarısı üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesi ve doğrusal ayırma analizi ile destek vektör makinesi (DVM) yöntemlerinin sınıflandırma performanslarının karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 10 kontrol ve uzman hekim tarafından epilepsi tanısı konmuş 10 hasta olmak üzere toplam 20 kişi dahil edildi. Epilepsi tanısı konmuş hastalardan alınan EEG kayıtları nöbet geçirmedikleri sırada alınan kayıtlardı. Epileptik ve epileptik olmayan sinyalleri sınıflandırmak için ayrık dalgacık dönüşümü ile sinyallerinin spektral analizi gerçekleştirildi ve sınıflandırmada kullanılacak olan öznitelikler elde edildi. Öncelikle özniteliklerin boyutu indirgenmeden, daha sonra temel bileşenler analizi ve bağımsız bileşenler analizi ile indirgenerek sınıflandırma yapıldı. Sınıflandırma doğrusal diskriminant analizi, lineer ve radyal tabanlı çekirdek fonksiyonlarının kullanıldığı DVM yöntemleri ile gerçekleştirildi. Bulgular: EEG sinyallerinin epileptik ya da normal olarak sınıflandırılmasında radyal tabanlı çekirdek fonksiyonunun kullanıldığı DVM ile %88,9 doğruluk oranı elde edildi. Sonuç: DVM yönteminin, epileptik ve normal sinyalleri ayırt etmede kullanılabilecek güçlü bir yöntem olduğu sonucuna varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIYLIOĞLU, N., TÜRE, M., ÖZTÜRK, H., ÖMÜRLÜ, İ. K. (2022). The Comparison of Different Dimension Reduction and Classification Methods in Electroencephalogram Signals. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 336–344. https://ajindex.com/articles/579095

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Nunez PL, Srinivasan R. Electric fields of the brain: the neurophysics of EEG: Oxford University Press, USA; 2006. Ropper AH. Adams and Victor's principles of neurology: McGrawHill Medical Pub. Division New York; 2005.
  2. Sanei S, Chambers J. EEG Signal processing, 2007. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England; 2007.
  3. Nuh M, Jazidie A, Muslim M, editors. Automatic detection of epileptic spikes based on wavelet neural network. Circuits and Systems, 2002 APCCAS'02 2002 Asia-Pacific Conference on; 2002:
  4. IEEE. Acharya UR, Sree SV, Swapna G, Martis RJ, Suri JS. Automated EEG analysis of epilepsy: a review. Knowledge-Based Systems 2013; 45: 147-65.
  5. Amorim P, Moraes T, Fazanaro D, Silva J, Pedrini H. Electroencephalogram signal classification based on shearlet and contourlet transforms. Expert Syst Appl 2017; 67: 140-7.
  6. Bao FS, Lie DY-C, Zhang Y, editors. A new approach to automated epileptic diagnosis using EEG and probabilistic neural network. Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 2008 ICTAI'08 20th IEEE International Conference on; 2008: IEEE. Bronzino JD. Biomedical engineering handbook: CRC press; 1999.
  7. Das AB, Bhuiyan MIH, Alam SS. Classification of EEG signals using normal inverse Gaussian parameters in the dual-tree complex wavelet transform domain for seizure detection. Signal Image and Video Processing 2016; 10: 259-66.
  8. Fu K, Qu J, Chai Y, Zou T. Hilbert marginal spectrum analysis for automatic seizure detection in EEG signals. Biomed Signal Process Control 2015; 18: 179-85.
  9. Kumar Y, Dewal M, Anand R. Epileptic seizures detection in EEG using DWT-based ApEn and artificial neural network. Signal Image and Video Processing 2014; 8: 1323-34.
  10. Sharma R, Pachori RB. Classification of epileptic seizures in EEG signals based on phase space representation of intrinsic mode functions. Expert Systems with Applications. 2015; 42: 1106-17.
  11. Subasi A, Gursoy MI. EEG signal classification using PCA, ICA, LDA and support vector machines. Expert Syst Appl 2010; 37: 865966. Alam SM, Bhuiyan MI. Detection of seizure and epilepsy using higher order statistics in the EMD domain. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2013; 17: 312-8.
  12. Amin HU, Malik AS, Ahmad RF, Badruddin N, Kamel N, Hussain M, et al. Feature extraction and classification for EEG signals using wavelet transform and machine learning techniques. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2015; 38: 139-49.
  13. Iscan Z, Dokur Z, Demiralp T. Classification of electroencephalogram signals with com