SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

The Morphological Changes in the Mandible Bone: The Effects of Age, Gender and Dental Status

Mandibular Morfolojik Değişiklikler: Yaş, Cinsiyet ve Diş Durumunun Etkileri

Güldane MAĞAT
Sevgi Özcan ŞENER
Pages
111–120
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Age influenced RW in females and on AGD in males (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This present study aimed to analzye the impact of age, gender and dental condition on remodeling of gonial and antegonial, condylar and ramus regions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: There were no differences for CH in regard to gender, dental status and age groups on both sides (p>0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Age influenced RW in females and on AGD in males (p
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This present study aimed to analzye the impact of age, gender and dental condition on remodeling of gonial and antegonial, condylar and ramus regions. We evaluated the changes in the antegonial angle (AGA), gonial angle (GA), antegonial depht (AGD), condylar height (CH), ramus width (RW) and ramus height (RH) in different age and dental groups on both genders. Materials­ and­ Methods: Approximately nine hundred and ten panoramic radiographs that were gathered were arranged into groups of age, dental status and gender. An evaluation of the GA, AGA, AGD, CH, RW, and RH was made. Results: There were no differences for CH in regard to gender, dental status and age groups on both sides (p>0.05). Age influenced RW in females and on AGD in males (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı yaş, cinsiyet ve diş durumunun gonial ve antegonial, kondil ve ramus bölgelerine etkilerini araştırmaktır. Her iki cinsiyette farklı yaş ve diş gruplarında gonial açı (GA), antegonial açı (AGA), antegonial derinlik (AGD), kondil yüksekliği (KY), ramus yüksekliği (RY) ve ramus genişliği (RG) değişikliklerini değerlendirdik. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Dokuz yüz on panoramik radyografi elde edildi ve bunlar yaş, diş durumu ve cinsiyete göre gruplandırıldı. GA, AGA, AGD, KY, RY ve RG analiz edildi. Bulgular: KY, her iki tarafta cinsiyet, yaş grupları ve diş durumuna göre fark göstermemekteydi (p>0,05). Yaşın kadınlarda RG, erkeklerde ise AGD üzerine etkili olduğu bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

MAĞAT, G., ŞENER, S. Ö. (2022). The Morphological Changes in the Mandible Bone: The Effects of Age, Gender and Dental Status. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 111–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/579073

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Enlow DH, Bianco HJ, Eklund S. The remodeling of the edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1976; 36: 685-93.
  2. Chole RH, Patil RN, Balsaraf Chole S, Gondivkar S, Gadbail AR, Yuwanati MB. Association of mandible anatomy with age, gender, and dental status: a radiographic study. ISRN Radiol 2013; 2013: 453763. Ohm E, Silness J. Size of the mandibular jaw angle related to age, tooth retention and gender. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 883-91.
  3. Raustia AM, Salonen MA. Gonial angles and condylar and ramus height of the mandible in complete denture wearers--a panoramic radiograph study. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 512-6.
  4. Ghosh S, Vengal M, Pai KM, Abhishek K. Remodeling of the antegonial angle region in the human mandible: a panoramic radiographic cross-sectional study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15: e802-7. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 27: 120-32. Fish SF. Change in the gonial angle. J Oral Rehabil 1979; 6: 219-27.
  5. Casey DM, Emrich LJ. Changes in the mandibular angle in the edentulous state. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 373-80.
  6. Dutra V, Yang J, Devlin H, Susin C. Mandibular bone remodelling in adults: evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 323-8.
  7. Raustia AM, Pirttiniemi P, Salonen MA, Pyhtinen J. Effect of edentulousness on mandibular size and condyle-fossa position. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 174-9.
  8. Huumonen S, Sipilä K, Haikola B, Tapio M, Söderholm AL, RemesLyly T, et al. Influence of edentulousness on gonial angle, ramus and condylar height. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37: 34-8.
  9. Xie Q, Wolf J, Soikkonen K, Ainamo A. Height of mandibular basal bone in dentate and edentulous subjects. Acta Odontol Scand 1996; 54: 379-83.
  10. Mattila K, Altonen M, Haavikko K. Determination of the gonial angle from the orthopantomogram. Angle Orthod 1977; 47: 107-10.
  11. Habets LL, Bras J, Borgmeyer-Hoelen AM. Mandibular atrophy and metabolic bone loss. Endocrinology, radiology and histomorphometry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 17: 208-11.
  12. Ogawa T, Osato S, Shishido Y, Okada M, Misaki K. Relationships between the gonial angle and mandibular ramus morphology in dentate subjects: a panoramic radiophotometric study. J Oral Implantol 2012; 38: 203-10.
  13. McDavid WD, Tronje G, Welander U, Morris CR. Dimensional reproduction in rotational panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 62: 96-101.
  14. Tronje G, Welander U, McDavid WD