Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

The Comparison of Different Surface Preparation Methods in Terms of Shear Bond Strength of Tri-ceram Porcelaintitanium Alloy

Tri-ceram Porselen ve Titanyum Alaşımı Arasındaki Makaslama Bağlantı Direnci Üzerine Farklı Yüzey Uygulamalarının Etkisi

Pages
137–143
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Such a simplicity suggests that etching with 10% HCl provides a very simple surface preparation method which involves in use of fewer parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Several studies have been made to evaluate effects of the surfacepreparation on shear bond strength (SBS) of titanium-porcelain complex.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Group 1: Control (C).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Such a simplicity suggests that etching with 10% HCl provides a very simple surface preparation method which involves in use of fewer parameters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Several studies have been made to evaluate effects of the surfacepreparation on shear bond strength (SBS) of titanium-porcelain complex. However,a completed picture has not been obtained yet. Therefore, such studies appearfrequently on recent literature. The purpose of this study is to determine a simplemethod providing strong SBS and using fewer parameters.Materials and Methods: Sixty titanium samples were equally divided into fivegroups. Group 1: Control (C). Group 2: Airborne-particle abrasion with 250 μ Al2O3 (250 μ AbPA). Group 3: Etching with 10% HCl (10% HCl). Group 4: Etching with Nd:YAG Laser at 6W (Nd6). Group 5: Etching with Nd:YAG laser at 7 W (Nd7).Results: Mean SBS value of C (10.69 MPa) was close to that of 250 μ AbPA (10.57MPa). The mean value of 10% HCl (19.37 MPa) was nearly twice higher than C,whereas those of laser groups (8.89 MPa and 8.77 MPa) were smaller than C. There was no overlap between SBS values of samples etched with 10% HCl and those of other samples. Multiple comparisons indicated a significant difference between acid group and others (p=0.00). Laser groups were different from control, too. The failure mode of % HCl group was 67% adhesive and 33% mix, while those of other groups were cohesive or mix.Conclusion: Titanium surfaces etched with 10% HCl provides significantly strongSBS values. This method requires only the use of aqueous solution of 10% HCl, and boiling process for 30 minutes. Such a simplicity suggests that etching with 10% HCl provides a very simple surface preparation method which involves in use of fewer parameters.

Özet

Amaç: Yüzey pürüzlendirme işlemlerinin titanyum porselen bağlantısının kopma direnci üzerine etkilerini değerlendiren birçok çalışma yapılmıştır. Buna rağmen henüz, bu alandaki yöntemlerin standardizasyonu sağlanamamıştır. Bu nedenle son yıllarda bu konuyla ilgili çalışmalara sıkça rastlanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, yüzey uygulama metodları ve doğru parametreleri kullanarak kopma direnci sonuçlarını değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Altmış titanyum örnek 5 gruba eşit sayıda bölündü. Grup 1: Kontrol, grup 2: Al2O3 (250 μm) ile kumlama, grup 3: Asit (%10 HCl) ile pürüzlendirme, grup 4: 6 W lazer (Nd:YAG) uygulama, grup 5: 7 W lazer (Nd:YAG) uygulama. Bulgular: Kontrol grubunun ortalama değerleri (10,69 MPa), kumlama grubuyla (10,57 MPa) yakın bulundu. Asit grubunun ortalama değerleri (19,37 MPa) önemli ölçüde kontrol grubundan fazla bulunurken, lazer grupları değerleri (8,89 MPa ve 8,77 MPa) kontrol grubundan düşük bulundu. Çoklu karşılaştırma testi sonucunda asit grubuyla diğer gruplar arasında anlamlı bir fark bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, B. D., MEŞE, A., KAYA, E. (2022). The Comparison of Different Surface Preparation Methods in Terms of Shear Bond Strength of Tri-ceram Porcelaintitanium Alloy. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 137–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/579050

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Reyes MJ, Oshida Y, Andres CJ, Barco T, Hovijitra S, Brown D. Titanium-porcelain system. Part III: effects of surface modification on bond strengths. Biomed Mater Eng 2001; 11: 117-36.
  2. Cai Z, Bunce N, Nunn ME, Okabe T. Porcelain adherence to dental cast CP titanium: effects of surface modifications. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 979-86.
  3. Ban S, Taniki T, Sato H, Kono H, Iwaya Y, Miyamoto M. Acid etching of titanium for bonding with veneering composite resins. Dent Mater J 2006; 25: 382-90.
  4. Troia MG Jr, Henriques GE, Mesquita MF, FragosoWS. The effect of surface modifications on titanium to enable titaniumporcelain bonding. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 28-33.
  5. Ramakrishnaiah R, Alkheraif AA, Divakar DD, Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. The Effect of Hydrofluoric Acid Etching Duration on the Surface Micromorphology, Roughness, and Wettability of Dental Ceramics. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17: E822. Kim JT, Cho SA. The effects of laser etching on shear bond strength at the titanium ceramic interface. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101: 101-6.
  6. Menezes FCH, Borges GA, Valentino TA, Oliveira MAHM, Turssi CP, Correr-sobrinho L. Effect of surface treatment and storage on the bond strength of different ceramic systems. Braz J Oral Sci 2009; 8: 119-23.
  7. Taira Y, Odatsu T, Sawase T. Effects of a fluoride etchant and a phosphate primer on bonding of veneering composite to Ti-6Al- 4V alloy for CAD/CAM restorations. J Prosthodont Res 2013; 57: 30-5.
  8. Egoshi T, Taira Y, Soeno K, Sawase T. Effects of sandblasting, H2SO4/HCl etching, and phosphate primer application on bond strength of veneering resin composite to commercially pure titanium grade 4. Dent Mater J 2013; 32: 219-27.
  9. Vignesh, Nayar S, Bhuminathan, Mahadevan, Santhosh S. Comparative evaluation of the three different surface treatments - conventional, laser and Nano technology methods in enhancing the surface characteristics of commercially pure titanium discs and their effects on cell adhesion: An in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015;7(Suppl 1): S87-91. Shayegh SSH, Amini P, Yaghmai K, Massoumi F, Abbasi K. Comparison of the Effect of Three methods of Porcelain Surface Treatment on Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Porcelain. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 2016; 28: 72-7.
  10. Lim BS, Heo SM, Lee YK, Kim CW. Shear bond strength between titanium alloys and composite resin: sandblasting versus fluoride-gel treatment. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003; 64: 38-43.
  11. Guilherme N, Wadhwani C, Zheng C, Chung KH. Effect of surface treatments on titanium allo