SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Width and Lateral Wall Thickness Using ConeBeam Computed Tomograph

Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi ile Maksiller Sinüs Genişliği veLateral Duvar Kalınlığının Değerlendirilmesi

Nazan KOÇAK TOPBAŞ
Esin ALPOZ
Pages
50–61
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean SW was stratified by the residual ridge height (

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to measure the lateral wall thickness (LWT) and width of the maxillary sinus using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to prevent intra- and post-operative complications by formulating a new sinus classification.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Residual ridge height, maxillary sinus width (SW) and lateral wall thickness (LWT) were measured by analysing CBCT scans from 246 edentulous sites.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean SW was stratified by the residual ridge height (
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to measure the lateral wall thickness (LWT) and width of the maxillary sinus using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to prevent intra- and post-operative complications by formulating a new sinus classification. Materials and Methods: Residual ridge height, maxillary sinus width (SW) and lateral wall thickness (LWT) were measured by analysing CBCT scans from 246 edentulous sites. The SW and LWT were measured at 3 mm and 5 mm, respectively, from the sinus floor. The mean SW was stratified by the residual ridge height (

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, ameliyat sırasında ve sonrası komplikasyonları önlemek amacıyla yeni bir sinüs sınıflandırması formüle ederek, konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi yardımıyla lateral duvar kalınlığını ve maksiller sinüs genişliğini ölçmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: İki yüz kırk altı dişsiz bölgeden alınan konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi taramaları analiz edilerek, rezidüel sırt yüksekliği, maksiller sinüs genişliği ve lateral duvar kalınlığı ölçüldü. Sinüs genişliği ve lateral duvar kalınlığı sinüs tabanından 3 ve 5 mm mesafelerde ölçüldü. Ortalama sinüs genişliği rezidüel sırt yüksekliği (

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPBAŞ, N. K., ALPOZ, E. (2022). Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Width and Lateral Wall Thickness Using ConeBeam Computed Tomograph. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 50–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/578968

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Wang HL, Katranji A. ABC sinus augmentation classification. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008; 28: 383-9
  2. Baldi D, Menini M, Pera F, Ravera G, Pera P. Sinus floor elevation using osteotomes or piezoelectric surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 40: 497-503. 3. van den Bergh JP, ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJ, Tuinzing DB. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 256-65
  3. Block MS, Kent JN. Sinus augmentation for dental implants: the use of autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55: 1281-6
  4. Misch CE. Maxillary sinus augmentation for endosteal implants: organized alternative treatment plans. Int J Oral Implantol 1987; 4: 49-58
  5. Barone A, Santini S, Sbordone L, Crespi R, Covani U. A clinical study of the outcomes and complications associated with maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 81-5
  6. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35(Suppl 8): 216-40
  7. Chan HL, Suarez F, Monje A, Benavides E, Wang HL. Evaluation of maxillary sinus width on cone-beam computed tomography for sinus augmentation and new sinus classification based on sinus width. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 647-52
  8. Teng M, Cheng Q, Liao J, Zhang X, Mo A, Liang X. Sinus width analysis and new classification with clinical implications for uugmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016; 18: 89-96
  9. Velloso GR, Vidigal GM Jr, de Freitas MM, Garcia de Brito OF, Manso MC, Groisman M. tridimensional analysis of maxillary sinus anatomy related to sinus lift procedure. Implant Dent 2006; 15: 192-6
  10. Cho SC, Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Tarnow DP. Influence of anatomy on schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus elevation surgery: three-dimensional analysis. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2001; 13: 160-3
  11. Ulm CW, Solar P, Krennmair G, Matejka M, Watzek G. Incidence and suggested surgical management of septa in sinus-lift procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10: 462-5
  12. Hernández-Alfaro F, Torradeflot MM, Marti C. Prevalence and management of schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus-lift procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 91-8
  13. Palma VC, Magro-Filho O, de Oliveria JA, Lundgren S, Salata LA, Sennerby L. Bone reformation and implant integration following maxillary sinus membrane elevation: an experi