Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Effect of an MDP-containing Primer on the Bond Strength Between Ten Different Resin Cements and Air-abraded Monolithic Zirconia

MDP İçerikli Primerin On Farklı Rezin Siman ve Kumlanmış Monolitik Zirkonya Arasındaki Bağlanma Dayanımına Etkisi

Pages
148–156
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The datawere statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s honestly significantdifference tests.Results: Statistical analyses revealed significant differences between the differentresin cement groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the shear bond strength(SBS) of different self-adhesive luting systems to airborne-particleabraded monolithic zirconia ceramic, with or without the application of a10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-based ceramic primer.Materials and Methods: A total of 200 monolithic zirconia specimens wereprepared and air-abraded using 50-µm aluminum oxide particles under a pressureof 2.5 bar.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After24 h of water storage, all of the resin-bonded samples were thermocycled 5,000times (5-55 °C).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The datawere statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s honestly significantdifference tests.Results: Statistical analyses revealed significant differences between the differentresin cement groups (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the shear bond strength(SBS) of different self-adhesive luting systems to airborne-particleabraded monolithic zirconia ceramic, with or without the application of a10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-based ceramic primer.Materials and Methods: A total of 200 monolithic zirconia specimens wereprepared and air-abraded using 50-µm aluminum oxide particles under a pressureof 2.5 bar. Ten different self-adhesive resin cements were then bonded to thezirconia specimens with or without the use of an MDP-containing primer. After24 h of water storage, all of the resin-bonded samples were thermocycled 5,000times (5-55 °C). The SBS of the specimens was measured using a universal testingmachine, and failure types were examined under a stereomicroscope. The datawere statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s honestly significantdifference tests.Results: Statistical analyses revealed significant differences between the differentresin cement groups (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı kendinden adezivli farklı yapıştırma sistemlerinin kumlanmış monolitik zirkonyaya bağlanma dayanımını (SBS) metakriloiloksidesil dihidrojen fosfat (MDP) esaslı seramik primeri uygulaması yaparak veya yapmadan değerlendirmektir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Toplamda 200 adet monolitik zirkonya örneği hazırlandı ve 50-µm alüminyum oksit kumu kullanılarak 2,5 bar basınç altında kumlandı. Daha sonra, 10 farklı kendinden adezivli rezin siman MDP içerikli primer uygulaması yapılarak veya yapılmadan zirkonya örneklere bağlandı. Rezin uygulanmış örneklere 24 saat suda bekleme süresinden sonra 5.000 termal döngü (5- 55 °C) uygulandı. Örneklerin SBS değerleri evrensel bir test makinesi kullanılarak ölçüldü. Başarısızlık tipleri stereomikroskop altında incelendi. Veriler iki-yönlü ANOVA ve Tukey dürüstçe anlamlı fark testleri kullanılarak istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: İstatistiksel analizler farklı rezin siman grupları arasında önemli farklılıklar olduğunu ortaya koymuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Okutan, Y., Yücel, M. T., Dönmez, M. B., Gezer, T. (2022). Effect of an MDP-containing Primer on the Bond Strength Between Ten Different Resin Cements and Air-abraded Monolithic Zirconia. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 148–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/578933

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Pittayachawan P, McDonald A, Petrie A, Knowles JC. The biaxial flexural strength and fatigue property of Lava Y-TZP dental ceramic. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1018-29
  2. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 299-307
  3. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 1-25
  4. Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. Strength and reliability of surface treated Y-TZP dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 304-13
  5. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007; 35: 819-26
  6. Kitayama S, Nikaido T, Takahashi R, Zhu L, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, et al. Effect of primer treatment on bonding of resin cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 426-32
  7. Preis V, Letsch C, Handel G, Behr M, Schneider-Feyrer S, Rosentritt M. Influence of substructure design, veneer application technique, and firing regime on the in vitro performance of molar zirconia crowns. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 113-21
  8. Alessandretti R, Borba M, Benetti P, Corazza PH, Ribeiro R, Della Bona A. Reliability and mode of failure of bonded monolithic and multilayer ceramics. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 191-7
  9. Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015; 31: 603-23
  10. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 624-39
  11. Venezia P, Torsello F, Cavalcanti R, D’Amato S. Retrospective analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldspathic porcelain veneering limited to the facial surface. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 506-12
  12. Nakamura K, Harada A, Inagaki R, Kanno T, Niwano Y, Milleding P, et al. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness. Acta Odontol Scand 2015; 73: 602-8
  13. Edelhoff D, Ozcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 193-204
  14. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the lite