SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

Does Different Application Procedures Effect Hardness of Self Adherable Materials?

Farklı Uygulama Prosedürleri Kendinden Bağlanabilen Restoratif Materyallerin Sertliğini Etkiler mi?

Başak YAZKAN
Duygu RECEN
Pages
24–30
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Statistical analyses were done with Friedman tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni post hoc tests (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To assess the effect of application procedures on the hardness of selfadherable materials after energy drink exposure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Samples from the main group were distributed into three subgroups (n=12): Red Bull, Burn, artificial saliva.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Statistical analyses were done with Friedman tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni post hoc tests (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of application procedures on the hardness of selfadherable materials after energy drink exposure. Materials and Methods: Alkasite (self-cured), alkasite (dual-cured), (HGI), HGI + coating, HGI + heating, (GC), GC + coating, GC + heating, and nanohybrid composite (control) used. Samples from the main group were distributed into three subgroups (n=12): Red Bull, Burn, artificial saliva. The samples were dipped in solutions 2-min daily, up to 6 months. Surface hardness measurements were done after the specimen preparation and after they were kept in the solution for 1 week, 1 month and 6 months. Statistical analyses were done with Friedman tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni post hoc tests (p

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı farklı sertleştirme prosedürlerinin, enerji içeceklerine maruz kaldıktan sonra restoratif materyallerin sertliği üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Alkasit (self-cured), alkasit (dual-cured), hibrit cam iyonomer (HGI), HGI + kaplama, HGI + ısıtma, cam karbomer (GC), GC + kaplama, GC + ısıtma ve nanohibrit kompozit (kontrol) kullanıldı. Her grup üç alt gruba ayrıldı (n=12): Red Bull, Burn, yapay tükürükte bekletme. Örnekler 6 ay boyunca günde 2 dakika solüsyonlara daldırıldı. Yüzey sertliği değerlendirmeleri başlangıçta, 1 hafta, 1 ay ve 6 ay sonra yapıldı. İstatistiksel analizler Friedman testi, Kruskal-Wallis ve Bonferroni post-hoc testleri kullanılarak yapıldı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZKAN, B., RECEN, D. (2022). Does Different Application Procedures Effect Hardness of Self Adherable Materials?. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 24–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/578911

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Savas S, Colgecen O, Yasa B, Kucukyilmaz E. Color stability, roughness, and water sorption/solubility of glass ionomer-Based restorative materials. Niger J Clin Pract 2019; 22: 824-32
  2. Ong J, Yap AU, Hong JY, Eweis AH, Yahya NA. Viscoelastic Properties of Contemporary Bulk-fill Restoratives: A Dynamicmechanical Analysis. Oper Dent 2018; 43: 307-14
  3. Kutuk ZB, Ozturk C, Cakir FY, Gurgan S. Mechanical performance of a newly developed glass hybrid restorative in the restoration of large MO Class 2 cavities. Niger J Clin Pract 2019; 22: 833-41
  4. Moshaverinia A, Ansari S, Moshaverinia M, Roohpour N, Darr JA, Rehman I. Effects of incorporation of hydroxyapatite and fluoroapatite nanobioceramics into conventional glass ionomer cements (GIC). Acta Biomater 2008; 4: 432-40
  5. Tatlı EC, Ozer L. Evaluation of physical and mechanical properties of glass carbomer cement under in vitro conditions. Turk J Clin Lab 2018; 9: 281-6
  6. Menne-Happ U, Ilie N. Effect of heat application on the mechanical behaviour of glass ionomer cements. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 643-50
  7. O'Brien T, Shoja-Assadi F, Lea SC, Burke FJ, Palin WM. Extrinsic energy sources affect hardness through depth during set of a glass-ionomer cement. J Dent 2010; 38: 490-5
  8. Kanik Ö, Turkun LS, Dasch W. In vitro abrasion of resin-coated highly viscous glass ionomer cements: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21: 821-9
  9. Mishra A, Singh G, Singh SK, Agarwal M, Qureshi R, Khurana N. Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Cention N with Conventionally used Restorative Materials—An In Vitro Study. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2018; 8: 120-4
  10. Cention N retrieved. Avaliable at URL: http://www. ivoclarvivadent.in/en-in/p/all/cention-n
  11. Yazkan B. Surface degradation evaluation of different selfadhesive restorative materials after prolonged energy drinks exposure. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020; 32: 707-14
  12. Cavalcanti AL, Costa Oliveira M, Florentino VG, dos Santos JA, Vieira FF, Cavalcanti CL. Short communication: In vitro assessment of erosive potential of energy drinks. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2010; 11: 253-5
  13. Ergücü Z, Türkün LS, Aladag A. Color stability of nanocomposites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 413-20
  14. Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM, Ozel S. Surface hardness of different restorative materials after long-term immersion in sports and energy drinks. Dent Mater J 2012; 31: 729-36
  15. Ryge G, Foley DE, Fairhur