SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

DETERMINATION OF TURKEY'S QUALITY OF GOVERNANCE POSITION BY WORLD BANK GOVERNANCE INDICATORS: CLUSTER ANALYSIS

DÜNYA BANKASI YÖNETİŞİM GÖSTERGELERİ İLE TÜRKİYE'NİN YÖNETİŞİM KALİTESİ KONUMUNUN BELİRLENMESİ: KÜMELEME ANALİZİ

İlter ÜNLÜKAPLAN
Ebru CANIKALP
Pages
409–427
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings of the study indicate that Turkey is in the same cluster with Mexico which has poor governance among countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study to determine Turkey's position in the world in terms of quality of governance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, cluster analysis applying Ward's (1963) Minimum Variance Method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings of the study indicate that Turkey is in the same cluster with Mexico which has poor governance among countries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study to determine Turkey's position in the world in terms of quality of governance. In this study, cluster analysis applying Ward's (1963) Minimum Variance Method. World Bank Governance Indicators dataset, which covers 182 countries for the period 1996-2013, is used in order to analyze, additionally it is aimed to determine Turkey's position on these countries. The findings of the study indicate that Turkey is in the same cluster with Mexico which has poor governance among countries.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'nin yönetişim kalitesi bakımından dünya ülkeleri içerisindeki konumunun belirlenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Çalışmada Ward'ın (1963) Minimum Varyans yöntemi ile kümeleme analizi kullanılmaktadır. Bu analizde, Dünya Bankası Yönetişim Göstergeleri veri setinde yer alan 182 ülke için 1996-2013 yılı Dünya Bankası Yönetişim Göstergeleri kullanılmakta ve Türkiye'nin bu ülkeler içindeki konumu incelenmektedir. Bu analizin sonucunda, Türkiye, Meksika ile aynı kümede ve kötü yönetişime sahip ülkeler arasında yer almaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNLÜKAPLAN, İ., CANIKALP, E. (2022). DETERMINATION OF TURKEY'S QUALITY OF GOVERNANCE POSITION BY WORLD BANK GOVERNANCE INDICATORS: CLUSTER ANALYSIS. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 409–427. https://ajindex.com/articles/578648

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ACEMOGLU Daron, ROBINSON James A., "De Facto Political Power and Instituti- onal Persistence", The American Economic Review, 2006, 96 (2), s.325-330.
  2. ACEMOGLU Daron, ROBINSON James A., Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, 1st ed. New York: Crown, 529, 2012.
  3. COURT Julius, HYDEN Goran ve MEASE, Ken., "Assessing Governance: Methodo- logical Challenges", World Governance Survey Discussion Paper, 2, United Nations University, Tokyo, Japan, 2002. EISSLER Eric R., "Mexico and Turkey: Unlikely Similarities in Their Geopolitical Si- tuation With Powerful Northern Neighbours", Research Turkey, 2013. http:// researchturkey.org/mexico-and-turkey-unlikely-similarities-in-their-geopoliti- cal-situation-with-powerful-northern-neighbors/, Erişim Tarihi (06.10.2014).
  4. HAIR Joseph. F., BLACK William. C., BABIN Barry J. ve ANDERSON Rolph E., Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th Ed., Prentice Hall, London, UK, 2009.
  5. HU Jianying, RAY B.K. ve SİNGH Moninder, "Statistical Methods for Automated Generation of Service Engagement Staffing Plans-References", IBM Journal of Research and Development, 2007, 51, 281-293.
  6. KAUFMANN Daniel, KRAAY Aart ve MASTRUZZI Massiomo, Governance Mat- ters VII:Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996-2007,
  7. Washington, DC, 2008.
  8. KAUFMANN, Daniel, KRAAY, Aart ve MASTRUZZI Massimo, The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues, 5430, World Bank, Washington, DC, 2010.
  9. NORUSIS, M. J., Cluster Analysis, Chapter 16. PASW Statistics 18: Statistical Pro- cedures Companion, 2010, 361-391.
  10. OECD (2014), "Focus on Inequality and Growth - December 2014", www.oecd.org/ social/inequality-and-poverty.html, Erişim Tarihi (11.1.2014). UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, "Governance Measure- ments for Conflict and Fragilty", Democratic Governance, Oslo Governance Centre, 2012.
  11. WARD, J. H. Jr., "Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function", Jour- nal of the American Statistical Association, 1963, 58, 236-244.
  12. WATERBURY John, Exposed to Innumerable Delusions: Public Enterprise and State Power in Egypt, India, Mexico and Turkey, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  13. WORLD BANK, Governance and World Bank Experiences, World Bank, Washin- gton, DC, 1994.
  14. WORLD BANK, A Decade of Measuring the Quality of Governance, Washington, DC., 2006. WORLD BANK GOVERNANCE INDICATORS WEBSITE, http://info.worldbank. org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#reports, Erişim Tarihi (14.12.2014). YÖNDEM Sinem, "Türkiye Kurumlarıyla Hep Padişa