SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marmara Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1

Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic surgery versus open surgery in rotator cuff repair

Ismail AGIRBAS
Mehmet Akif AKCAL
Nazife OZTURK
Ferda ISIKCELIK
Pages
66–71
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, statistical significantdifference was found between the surgery, medication, medical and surgical materials, hospitalization and average cost of thosetreated with open surgery and those treated with arthroscopic surgery (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to compare the open and arthroscopic rotator cuff tear treatment methods in terms of cost-effectiveness.Materials and Methods: This study includes a prospective method of a total of 104 patients, 52 with open surgery and 52 witharthroscopic surgery, in the treatment of rotator cuff tears.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Oxford Shoulder Score and Short Form-36 Health Survey Questionnaire were used for effectiveness calculations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, statistical significantdifference was found between the surgery, medication, medical and surgical materials, hospitalization and average cost of thosetreated with open surgery and those treated with arthroscopic surgery (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the open and arthroscopic rotator cuff tear treatment methods in terms of cost-effectiveness.Materials and Methods: This study includes a prospective method of a total of 104 patients, 52 with open surgery and 52 witharthroscopic surgery, in the treatment of rotator cuff tears. Cost calculations of the treatment methods were obtained from patientinvoices. Oxford Shoulder Score and Short Form-36 Health Survey Questionnaire were used for effectiveness calculations. The costeffectiveness comparison was conducted using the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) assessment. The difference betweencosts of open and arthroscopic surgery was analyzed using the SPSS 23.0 package program, with Mann-Whitney U test.Results: The average cost per patient was 4,838.7 Turkish Liras (TL) (866.22 USD) in open surgery and 5,770.33 TL (1,033.00 USD)according to the exchange rate at the time of writing, in arthroscopic surgery. Oxford Shoulder Score was 21.15 in open surgery and20.83 in arthroscopic surgery. Short Form-36 Health Survey Questionnaire score was 61.92 in open surgery and 63.17 in arthroscopicsurgery. The ICER calculated according to the Oxford Shoulder Score was – 2,912.37 TL (521,37 USD), while the ICER calculatedaccording to the General Health Perception sub-scale of Short Form-36 was 745.57 TL (133,47 USD). In addition, statistical significantdifference was found between the surgery, medication, medical and surgical materials, hospitalization and average cost of thosetreated with open surgery and those treated with arthroscopic surgery (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AGIRBAS, I., AKCAL, M. A., OZTURK, N., ISIKCELIK, F. (2022). Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic surgery versus open surgery in rotator cuff repair. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1, 66–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/578376

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Karapınar S, Uruç V, Özden R, Duman İ, Doğramacı Y, Kalacı A. Clinical radiological outcomes of rotator cuff repair by single-row suture-anchor technique with mini – open approach. Dicle Med J 2014; 41: 347-51. doi: 10.5798/ diclemedj.0921.2014.02.0429 [2] Mahiroğulları M, İşyar M, Çakmak S. Rotator cuff tears. TOTBID Journal 2013;12: 353 – 59. doi: 10.14292/totbid. dergisi.2013.43 [3] Aminzadeh B, Najafi S, Moradi A, Abbasi B, Farrokh D, Emadzadeh M. Evaluation of diagnostic precision of ultrasound for rotator cuff disorders in patients with shoulder pain. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2020;8:689-95. doi:10.22038/ abjs.2020.42894.2166 [4] Kjima H, Minagawa H, Nishi T, Kikuchi K, Shimada Y. Long-term follow-up of cases of Rotator cuff tear treated conservatively. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2012; 2: 491-94. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.012 [5] Bunker T. Rotator cuff disease. Curr Orthop 2002; 16: 223-33. doi: 10.1054/cuor.2002.0257 [6] Yaradılmış Y, Okkaoğlu M, Şeşen H, Tarğal A, Ateş A, Altay M. There is no difference in between clinical results of fast transosseos repair and double row suture anchor technique for repair of rotator cuff rupture. Bozok Med J 2019; 9: 1-8. doi: 10.16919/bozoktip.427558 [7] Castagna A, Garofalo R, Maman E, Gray A, Brooks E. Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of the subacromial spacer for irreparable and massive rotator cuff tears. Int Orthop 2019; 43: 395-403. doi:10.1007/s00264.018.4065-x [8] First 100 Hospitals in Each Branch 2017
  2. January-October Policlinic, Hospitalization, Intensive Care and Emergency Service Statistics. https://dosyahastane.saglik.gov.tr/ Eklenti/9300,2017-ocak-ekim-donemi-poliklinik-yatis- ve-yogun-bakim-ve-acil-servis-verileri-baglaminda-herbransta-ilk-100-hastanepdf.pdf?0 (Access date: 01.11.2019) [9] Vitale MA, Vitale MG, Zivin JG, Braman JP, Bigliani LU, Flatow EL. Rotator cuff repair: an analysis of utility scores and cost-effectiveness. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2007;16: 181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.06.013 [10] Deprés-Tremblay G, Chevrier A, Snow M, Hurtig MB, Rodeo S, Buschmann MD. Rotator cuff repair: a review of surgical techniques, animal models, and new technologies under development. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2016; 25: 2078-85. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.009 [11] Wylie JD, Suter, T, Potter, MQ, Granger EK, Tashjian RZ. Mental health has a stronger association with patient-reported shoulder pain and function than tear size in patients with fullthickness rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg 2016; 98:251-6. doi: 10.