Journals / Maliye Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 177

Examining the Validity of Uncovered Interest Rate Parity in Same Emerging Markets

Bazı Gelişen Piyasa Ekonomilerinde Garantisiz (Uncovered) Faiz Oranı Paritesinin Geçerliliğinin İncelenmesi

Pages
160–176
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This finding means that alternative models may be important for examining the validity of uncovered interest rate parity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the validity of uncovered interest rate parity in emerging markets including Turkey, South Africa, Mexico, Colombia and Indonesia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results of the conventional model show that uncovered interest rate parity does not hold for any country under the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This finding means that alternative models may be important for examining the validity of uncovered interest rate parity.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study examines the validity of uncovered interest rate parity in emerging markets including Turkey, South Africa, Mexico, Colombia and Indonesia. To this end, a conventional model and a stationarity analysis of these countries’ risk premiums are performed. The results of the conventional model show that uncovered interest rate parity does not hold for any country under the study. However, the findings based on the stationarity analysis of the countries’ risk premiums indicate that uncovered interest rate parity may hold for all the countries under the study. This finding means that alternative models may be important for examining the validity of uncovered interest rate parity.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Türkiye, Güney Afrika, Meksika, Kolombiya ve Endonezya’dan oluşan beş adet gelişen piyasa ekonomisinde garantisiz faiz oranı paritesinin geçerliliği incelenmiştir. Çalışmada, bu amaçla geleneksel modelle ülke risk primlerinin durağanlık analizlerine yer verilmiştir. Geleneksel model sonuçları garantisiz faiz oranı paritesinin inceleme kapsamındaki ülkelerin hiçbirinde geçerli olmadığı sonucuna işaret etmektedir. Ülke risk primlerinin durağanlık analizine dayalı sonuçları ise garantisiz faiz oranı paritesinin inceleme kapsamındaki ülkelerin tamamı için geçerli olabileceğini göstermektedir. Bu bulgu da garantisiz faiz oranı paritesinin geçerliliğinin incelenmesinde alternatif modellerin önemli olabileceği anlamına gelmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜBERKÖKÜ, Ö. (2022). Examining the Validity of Uncovered Interest Rate Parity in Same Emerging Markets. Maliye Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 177, 160–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/577881

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Adewuyi, A.O. ve Ogebe, J.O. (2019), “The Validity of Uncovered Interest Parity: Evidence From African Members and Non-Member of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), Economic Modelling. Aggarwal, S. (2013), “The Uncovered Interest Rate Parity Puzzle in the Foreign Exchange Market”, New York University, http://webdocs. stern.nyu.edu/old_web/economics/docs/workingpapers/2013/Aggar wal _Parity Puzzle_May2013.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2018)
  2. Alexius, A. (2001), “Uncovered Interest Parity Revesited”, Review of International Economics, 9(3), 505-517.
  3. Aslan, Ö. ve Korap, H.L. (2010), “Does the Uncovered Interest Parity Hold in Short Horizons?”, Applied Economic Letters, 17, 361-365.
  4. Baillie, R.T. ve Osterberg, W.P. (2000), “Deviations from Daily Uncovered Interest Rate Parity and the Role of Intervention”, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money,10,363-379.
  5. Balke, N.S. ve Wohar, M.E. (1998), "Nonlinear Dynamics and Covered Interest Rate Parity", Emprical Economics, 23(4), 535 -559. Başçı, E. ve Kara, H.(2011), “Finansal İstikrar ve Para Politikası”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 26(302), 9-25.
  6. Bhatti, R.H. (2014), “The Existence of Uncovered Interest Parity in the CIS Countries, Economic Modelling, 40, 227-241.
  7. Breusch, T.S. (1978), “Testing for Autocorrelation in Dynamic Linear Models”, Australian Economic Papers, 17, 334–355.
  8. Chaboud, A.P. ve Wright, J.H. (2005), “Uncovered Interest Parity: It Works But Not for Long”, Journal of International Economics, 66, 349-362.
  9. Chinn, M. ve Meredith, G. (2004), “Monetary Policy and Long-Horizon Uncovered Interest Parity, IMF Staff Papers, 51(3), 409-430.
  10. Chinn, M.D. (2006), The (Partial) Rehabilitation of Interest Rate Parity in the Floating Rate Era: Longer Horiznons, Alternative Expectations, And Emerging Markets”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 25, 7-21.
  11. Craighead, W.D., Davis, G.K. ve Miller, N.C. (2010), “Interest Differentials and Extreme Support For Uncovered Interest Rate Parity”, International Review of Economics and Finance, 19, 723-732.
  12. Doodley, M.P. ve Isard, P. (1980), “Capital Controls, Political Risk and Deviations from Interest Parity”, Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 370-384.
  13. Engel, C. (1996), “The Forward Discount Anomaly and Risk Premium, A Survey of Recent Evidence, Journal of EmpiricalFinance, 3, 123-192.
  14. Erdemlioglu, D.M. (2007), “A New Test of Uncovered Interest Rate Parity: Evidence from Turkey”, MPRA, Paper No.10787: 1-20.
  15. Fama, E.F. (19