Journals / Kulak Burun Boğaz Uygulamaları / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Two-level septocolumellar suture technique in closed septorhinoplasty

Kapalı septorinoplastide iki seviyeli septokolumellar sütür tekniği

Pages
108–113
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean pre- and postoperativeVAS scores were 7.3±1.7 and 1.6±1.9, respectively (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effect of two-levelseptocolumellar suture technique on closed septorhinoplasty.Patients and Methods: Between January 2016 and June2017, a total of 45 patients (28 females, 17 males; meanage 29.2±10.3 years; range, 18 to 55 years) who underwentclosed septorhinoplasty with no strut graft use using twolevelseptocolumellar suture technique were included.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Theabsorbable 4.0 Vicryl suture was used as the suture material.The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to grade nasalobstruction preoperatively and at six months after surgery.Results: Postoperative redeviation not leading to passageblockage and any aesthetic defect was observed in one patient.No major or minor functional and aesthetic deformity wasobserved in any of the patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean pre- and postoperativeVAS scores were 7.3±1.7 and 1.6±1.9, respectively (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effect of two-levelseptocolumellar suture technique on closed septorhinoplasty.Patients and Methods: Between January 2016 and June2017, a total of 45 patients (28 females, 17 males; meanage 29.2±10.3 years; range, 18 to 55 years) who underwentclosed septorhinoplasty with no strut graft use using twolevelseptocolumellar suture technique were included. Theabsorbable 4.0 Vicryl suture was used as the suture material.The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to grade nasalobstruction preoperatively and at six months after surgery.Results: Postoperative redeviation not leading to passageblockage and any aesthetic defect was observed in one patient.No major or minor functional and aesthetic deformity wasobserved in any of the patients. The mean pre- and postoperativeVAS scores were 7.3±1.7 and 1.6±1.9, respectively (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada iki seviyeli septokolumellar sütür tekniğinin kapalı septorinoplasti üzerine etkisi araştırıldı. Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Ocak 2016 - Haziran 2017 tarihleri arasında, iki seviyeli septokolumellar sütür tekniği kullanılarak strut greft kullanılmaksızın kapalı septorinoplasti yapılan toplam 45 hasta (28 kadın, 17 erkek; ort. yaş 29.2±10.3 yıl; dağılım, 18-55 yıl) çalışmaya alındı. Sütür materyali olarak emilebilir 4.0 Vicryl sütür kullanıldı. Ameliyat öncesi ve ameliyat sonrası 6. ayda burun tıkanıklığını derecelendirmek için görsel analog ölçeği (GAÖ) kullanıldı. Bulgular: Bir hastada burun tıkanıklığına ve estetik deformiteye neden olmayan ameliyat sonrası redeviasyon görüldü. Hastaların hiçbirinde majör veya minör fonksiyonel ve estetik deformite gözlenmedi. Ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası GAÖ skoru, sırasıyla 7.3±1.7 ve 1.6±1.9 idi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

EVREN, C., Demirbilek, N. (2022). Two-level septocolumellar suture technique in closed septorhinoplasty. Kulak Burun Boğaz Uygulamaları, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 108–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/576540

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Huizing EH, de Groot JAM, editors. Septal surgery. In: Basic Functional Reconstructive Nasal Surgery. New York: Thieme; 2003. p. 140-88
  2. Ridenour BD. The nasal septum. In: Cumming CW, editor. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1998. p. 921-48
  3. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ. Management of the deviated nose. The importance of septal reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1988;15:43-55
  4. Erbek S, Erbek SS. Eğri burunlarda dorsal septal deviasyonların spreader greft ile düzeltilmesi. KBB-Forum 2003;2:76-80
  5. Bloom JD, Kaplan SE, Bleier BS, Goldstein SA. Septoplasty complications: avoidance and management. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009;42:463-81
  6. Kenyon GS, Kalan A, Jones NS. Columelloplasty: a new suture technique to correct caudal septal cartilage dislocation. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2002;27:188-91
  7. Cardenas JC, Carvajal J, Ruiz A. Securing nasal tip rotation through suspension suture technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:1741-2
  8. Neu BR. Suture correction of nasal tip cartilage concavities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:971-9
  9. Tebbetts JB. Shaping and positioning the nasal tip without structural disruption: a new, systematic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;94:61-77
  10. Khodaei I, Palma P. The judicious use of grafts in endonasal septorhinoplasty. B-ENT. 2010;6:77-87
  11. Gruber RP. Suture techniques in rhinoplasty by use of the endonasal (closed) approach. Aesthet Surg J 1998;18:99-103
  12. Akkus AM, Eryilmaz E, Guneren E. Comparison of the effects of columellar strut and septal extension grafts for tip support in rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013;37:666- 73
  13. Daniel RK, editor. Rhinoplasty. An Atlas of Surgical Techniques. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002. p.163-225
  14. Demirbilek N, Evren C, Elbistanlı MS, Altun U, Günay SS. Two-level septocolumellar suture technique for correction of septal caudal dislocation. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2016;82:403-7
  15. Gruber RP, Nahai F, Bogdan MA, Friedman GD. Changing the convexity and concavity of nasal cartilages and cartilage grafts with horizontal mattress sutures: part II. Clinical results. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:595-606
  16. Çağıcı CA, Erkan AN, Yılmazer C, Özer C, Çakmak Ö. Septorinoplasti sonrası dikişe bağlı geç dönem burun ucu enfeksiyonu. KBB ve BBC Dergisi 2007;15:31-6
  17. Altınyazar HC, Koca R. Dermatolojik cerrahide sık kullanılan suture materyalleri. Dermatose 2004;3:13-7
  18. Kama NA, Coskun T, Yavuz H, Doganay M, Reis E, Akat AZ. Autologou