Journals / Kulak Burun Boğaz Uygulamaları / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of allergic rhinitis patients and their skin prick test results in Kayseri province

Kayseri ilinde alerjik rinit hastalarının ve deri prick testi sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi

Pages
137–144
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Olive tree pollen allergy was common, although this type of tree does not grow in Kayseri region.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the demographic and clinical characteristics as well as the skin prick test (SPT) results of patients diagnosed as allergic rhinitis (AR) in Kayseri province in the year 2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 114 patients (39 males, 75 females; mean age 24±11.5 yıl; range, 3 to 63 years) who applied to Otolaryngology Department of Develi Hatice Muammer Kocatürk State Hospital in the year 2018 and was diagnosed as AR and performed SPT.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Olive tree pollen allergy was common, although this type of tree does not grow in Kayseri region.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the demographic and clinical characteristics as well as the skin prick test (SPT) results of patients diagnosed as allergic rhinitis (AR) in Kayseri province in the year 2018. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 114 patients (39 males, 75 females; mean age 24±11.5 yıl; range, 3 to 63 years) who applied to Otolaryngology Department of Develi Hatice Muammer Kocatürk State Hospital in the year 2018 and was diagnosed as AR and performed SPT. There were 35 children and 79 adult patients. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics as well as SPT results were recorded. Results: When symptomatic periods were reviewed, there were 83 patients with seasonal and 31 patients with perennial AR. The most common admission was between the ages 11 to 20 years. The month of April was the most common admission period for seasonal AR patients. Seasonal AR was more common in those who had familial atopy history. No sensitivity to any allergen was detected in the SPT of 33 patients. Seventy-three patients had sensitivity to multiple allergens. The most common allergens were pollen IV mix (n=47), Dermatophagoides (D.) pterynossinus (n=37), Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) (n=35), olive tree pollen (n=31) and D. farinae (n=30). While house dust mite allergy was more common in perennial AR patients, pollen sensitivity was more common in seasonal AR. Conclusion: In Kayseri province, AR was more frequent in males until school age and in females after school age. The most common admission periods were adolescence and early adulthood. Seasonal AR was more common. While house dust mite allergy was more common in perennial AR patients, pollen sensitivity was more common in seasonal AR. Olive tree pollen allergy was common, although this type of tree does not grow in Kayseri region.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada Kayseri ilinde 2018 yılında alerjik rinit (AR) tanısı konulan hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri ile deri prick testi (DPT) sonuçları değerlendirildi. Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışmaya 2018 yılında Develi Hatice Muammer Kocatürk Devlet Hastanesi, Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları Kliniğine başvuran ve AR tanısı konularak DPT uygulanan 114 hasta (39 erkek, 75 kadın; ort. yaş 24±11.5 yıl; dağılım, 3-63 yıl) dahil edildi. Otuz beş çocuk, 79 erişkin hasta vardı. Hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri ile DPT sonuçları kaydedildi. Bulgular: Semptomatik dönemlere bakıldığında, 83 hastada mevsimsel ve 31 hastada pereniyal AR vardı. En yaygın başvuru 11-20 yaş arasındaydı. Mevsimsel AR hastalarında en yaygın başvuru dönemi Nisan ayıydı. Ailesinde atopi öyküsü olanlarda mevsimsel AR daha yaygındı. Otuz üç hastanın DPT’sinde herhangi bir alerjene karşı duyarlılık saptanmadı. Yetmiş üç hastada birden fazla alerjene karşı duyarlılık vardı. En yaygın alerjenler sırasıyla polen IV karışımı (n=47), Dermatophagoides (D.) pterynossinus (n=37), köpek dişi ayrık otu (Cynodon dactylon) (n=35), zeytin ağacı poleni (n=31) ve D. farinae (n=30) idi. Pereniyal AR hastalarında ev tozu akarı alerjisi daha yaygın iken mevsimsel AR hastalarında polen duyarlılığı daha yaygındı. Sonuç: Kayseri ilinde AR okul çağına kadar erkeklerde, okul çağı sonrasında kadınlarda daha yaygındı. En sık başvurulan dönem; ergenlik ve erken erişkinlik dönemiydi. Mevsimsel AR daha yaygındı. Pereniyal AR hastalarında ev tozu akarı alerjisi daha yaygınken mevsimsel AR’de polen duyarlılığı daha yaygındı. Bu tip ağaç Kayseri bölgesinde yetişmemesine rağmen zeytin ağacı poleni alerjisi yaygındı.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖKOĞLU, K., KUTLU, Ö. (2022). Evaluation of allergic rhinitis patients and their skin prick test results in Kayseri province. Kulak Burun Boğaz Uygulamaları, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 137–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/576529

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bayram A, Büyükoğğlan H, Gülmez İ, Ramazan D, Oymak S. The Prevalance of Atopy and Allergic Rhinitis in Asthma. Erciyes Med J 2010;32:27-34
  2. Şimşek Y, Yılmaz Ö, Yüksel H. Allerjik Rinit. Asthma Allergy Immunol 2018;16:59-69
  3. Keles E, Karlıdağ T, Alpay HC, Akyiğit A, Kaygusuz İ, Yalçın Ş. Alerjik rinitli olgularımızda semptomlar ve cilt testi ile saptanan alerjenlerin dağılımı. KBB-Forum 2010;9:20-4. 4. van Cauwenberge P, Bachert C, Passalacqua G, Bousquet J, Canonica GW, Durham SR, et al. Consensus statement on the treatment of allergic rhinitis. European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Allergy 2000;55:116-34
  4. Heinzerling L, Mari A, Bergmann KC, Bresciani M, Burbach G, Darsow U, et al. The skin prick test - European standards. Clin Transl Allergy 2013;3:3
  5. Başaran AE, Torun NK, Kocacık Uygun DF, Bıngöl A. Distribution of Aeroallergens on Skin Prick Tests of Atopic Children Living in the Akdeniz Region, Turkey. Asthma Allergy Immunol 2018;16:132-7
  6. Wise SK, Lin SY, Toskala E, Orlandi RR, Akdis CA, Alt JA, et al. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: allergic rhinitis executive summary. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2018;8:108-352
  7. Wheatley LM, Togias A. Clinical practice. Allergic rhinitis. N Engl J Med 2015;372:456-63
  8. Cingi C, Gevaert P, Mösges R, Rondon C, Hox V, Rudenko M, et al. Multi-morbidities of allergic rhinitis in adults: European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force Report. Clin Transl Allergy 2017;7:17
  9. Vasileiadou S, Wennergren G, Strömberg Celind F, Åberg N, Pettersson R, Alm B, et al. Eating fish and farm life reduce allergic rhinitis at the age of twelve. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2018;29:283-9
  10. Alm B, Goksör E, Thengilsdottir H, Pettersson R, Möllborg P, Norvenius G, et al. Early protective and risk factors for allergic rhinitis at age 4½ yr. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2011;22:398-404
  11. Westman M, Stjärne P, Asarnoj A, Kull I, van Hage M, Wickman M, et al. Natural course and comorbidities of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;129:403-8
  12. Fröhlich M, Pinart M, Keller T, Reich A, Cabieses B, Hohmann C, et al. Is there a sex-shift in prevalence of allergic rhinitis and comorbid asthma from childhood to adulthood? A meta-analysis. Clin Transl Allergy 2017;7:44
  13. Acar A, Pınar NM, Şafak F, Silici S. Analysis of Airborne Pollen Grains in Kayseri, Turkey. Karaelmas Fen ve Müh. Derg 2015;5:79-88
  14. Konuk S, Bilgin C, Çoba