SavedAdd your journal

Journals / KBB-Forum / 2018 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4

A COMPARISON OF QUALITY OF LIFE AND OUTCOMES OF ENDOSCOPIC AND CONVENTIONAL SEPTOPLASTY

ENDOSKOPİK VE KONVANSİYONEL SEPTOPLASTİNİN YAŞAM KALİTESİ ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİNİN VE SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Görkem ESKİİZMİR
Uzdan UZ
Journal
KBB-Forum
Pages
138–143
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The VASand NOSE scores were significantly improved postoperatively (pCS-VAS

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi İzmir Bozyaka Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kulak Burun Boğaz Kliniği, İzmir, Turkey 2Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Manisa, TurkeySUMMARYObjective: Endoscopic septoplasty (ES) is a minimally invasive surgical technique for the nasal septal deviation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of thisstudy was to compare the quality of life and outcomes of patients who underwent conventional septoplasty (CS) and ES without additionalnasal surgeries.Methods: A total of 36 patients were selected among patients who underwent CS, and 35 sex- and age-matched patients who underwentES were enrolled in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The VASand NOSE scores were significantly improved postoperatively (pCS-VAS
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi İzmir Bozyaka Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kulak Burun Boğaz Kliniği, İzmir, Turkey 2Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Manisa, TurkeySUMMARYObjective: Endoscopic septoplasty (ES) is a minimally invasive surgical technique for the nasal septal deviation. The purpose of thisstudy was to compare the quality of life and outcomes of patients who underwent conventional septoplasty (CS) and ES without additionalnasal surgeries.Methods: A total of 36 patients were selected among patients who underwent CS, and 35 sex- and age-matched patients who underwentES were enrolled in the study. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores were used tocollect the patient’s quality of life at the time of diagnosis and 3 months after CS and ES. The complication rates, duration of surgery andhospital stay were comparatively analyzed.Results: Preoperative VAS and NOSE scores were not statistically different in both groups (p=0.731, p=0.899; respectively). The VASand NOSE scores were significantly improved postoperatively (pCS-VAS

Özet

Amaç: Endoskopik septoplasti (ES), septal deviasyonun düzeltilmesinde tercih edilen minimal invaziv cerrahi tekniktir. Bu çalışmanın amacı ek bir nazal cerrahi olmaksızın ES ve konvansiyonel septoplasti (KS) uygulanan olgularda yaşam kalitesini ve sonuçlarını karşılaştırmaktır. Yöntemler: Otuzaltı KS uygulanan hasta ve cinsiyet-yaş uyumlu 35 ES uygulanan hasta çalışmaya alındı. Hastaların yaşam kaliteleri; tanı anında ve cerrahilerden 3 ay sonra Vizüel Analog Skala (VAS) ve Burun Tıkanıklığı Semptom Değerlendirme (BTSD) skorları ile değerlendirildi. Komplikasyon oranları, cerrahi ve hastanede kalış süreleri de karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Preoperatif VAS ve BTSD skorlarının her iki grupta da farklı olmadığı izlendi (p=0.731, p=0.899). Postoperatif dönemde VAS ve BTSD skorlarının anlamlı derecede düzeldiği izlendi (pKS-VAS

🔖

Cite This Article

ESKİİZMİR, G., UZ, U. (2022). A COMPARISON OF QUALITY OF LIFE AND OUTCOMES OF ENDOSCOPIC AND CONVENTIONAL SEPTOPLASTY. KBB-Forum, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4, 138–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/573117

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Elahi MM, Frenkiel S. Septal deviation and chronic sinus disease. Am J Rhinol 2000;14:175-179.
  2. Huang HH, Lee TJ, Huang CC, Chang PH, Huang SF. Nonsinusitis-related rhinogenous headache: a ten-year experience. Am J Otolaryngol 2008;29:326-332.
  3. Uygur K, Yariktas M, Tuz M, Doner F, Ozgan A. [The incidence of septal deviation in newborns]. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2002;9:117-120.
  4. Zielnik-Jurkiewicz B, Olszewska-Sosinska O. The nasal septum deformities in children and adolescents from Warsaw, Poland. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006;70:731-736.
  5. Mladina R, Cujic E, Subaric M, Vukovic K. Nasal septal deformities in ear, nose, and throat patients: an international study. Am J Otolaryngol 2008;29(2):75-82. Holt GR. Biomechanics of nasal septal trauma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1999;32(4):615-619.
  6. Paradis J, Rotenberg BW. Open versus endoscopic septoplasty: a single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;40 Suppl 1:S28-33. Bothra R, Mathur NN. Comparative evaluation of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty for limited septal deviation and spur. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123:737-741. Dolan RW. Endoscopic septoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2004;20:217-221.
  7. Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:157-163.
  8. Resende L, Carmo CD, Mocellin L, Pasinato R, Mocellin M. Disease-specific quality of life after septoplasty and bilateral inferior turbinate outfracture in patients with nasal obstruction. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2017;29. Gupta M, Motwani G. Comparative study of endoscopic aided septoplasty and traditional septoplasty in posterior nasal septal deviations. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;57:309-311.
  9. Gulati SP, Wadhera R, Ahuja N, Garg A, Ghai A. Comparative evaluation of endoscopic with conventional septoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;61:27-29.
  10. Sathyaki DC, Geetha C, Munishwara GB, Mohan M, Manjuanth K. A comparative study of endoscopic septoplasty versus conventional septoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;66:155-161.
  11. Castelnuovo P, Pagella F, Cerniglia M, Emanuelli E. Endoscopic limited septoplasty in combination with sinonasal surgery. Facial Plast Surg 1999;15:303-307.
  12. Hwang PH, McLaughlin RB, Lanza DC, Kennedy DW. Endoscopic septoplasty: indications, technique, and results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;120:678-682.
  13. Hong CJ, Monteiro E, Badh