SavedAdd your journal

Journals / KBB-Forum / 2018 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

EFFECT OF SEPTAL DEVIATION ON PARANASAL SINUS ANATOMY

SEPTAL DEVİASYONUN PARANAZAL SİNÜS ANATOMİSİNE ETKİSİ

Selma UYSAL RAMADAN
Elif DAĞLI
Sevinç BAYRAK
Cansu ÖZTÜRK
Journal
KBB-Forum
Pages
87–94
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The presence of concha bullosa in deviated side did not have a significant effect on thevolume of frontal sinus and frontoethmoid recess diameter (p> 0,001).Conclusion: The ostiomeatal complex diameter, frontoethmoid recess diameter and ethmoid cell volume were found to be smaller indeviated side of the septum.Therefore rhinologic surgeons should be aware of the increased risk of surgical approach in deviated side.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To investigate the effect of septal deviation on the important paranasal structures and sinus volumes.Methods: Paranasal computed tomography (CT) scans of 133 patients with septum deviation (67 males, 66 females; age over 18 years)were retrospectively evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Frontal, ethmoid and maxillary sinus volumes, ostiomeatal complex, sphenoethmoid recess andfrontoethmoid recess diameters in deviated side contralateral side were compared and concha bullosa(CB) formation was evaluated.Results: Deviation angles varied between 2,7 and 21,5 degrees with a mean value of 9,7±4,1.The mean wide of osteomeatal complexand frontoethmoideal recess diameter diameter was significantly smaller in deviated side than contralateral side (p 0,001).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The presence of concha bullosa in deviated side did not have a significant effect on thevolume of frontal sinus and frontoethmoid recess diameter (p> 0,001).Conclusion: The ostiomeatal complex diameter, frontoethmoid recess diameter and ethmoid cell volume were found to be smaller indeviated side of the septum.Therefore rhinologic surgeons should be aware of the increased risk of surgical approach in deviated side.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of septal deviation on the important paranasal structures and sinus volumes.Methods: Paranasal computed tomography (CT) scans of 133 patients with septum deviation (67 males, 66 females; age over 18 years)were retrospectively evaluated. Frontal, ethmoid and maxillary sinus volumes, ostiomeatal complex, sphenoethmoid recess andfrontoethmoid recess diameters in deviated side contralateral side were compared and concha bullosa(CB) formation was evaluated.Results: Deviation angles varied between 2,7 and 21,5 degrees with a mean value of 9,7±4,1.The mean wide of osteomeatal complexand frontoethmoideal recess diameter diameter was significantly smaller in deviated side than contralateral side (p 0,001). The presence of concha bullosa in deviated side did not have a significant effect on thevolume of frontal sinus and frontoethmoid recess diameter (p> 0,001).Conclusion: The ostiomeatal complex diameter, frontoethmoid recess diameter and ethmoid cell volume were found to be smaller indeviated side of the septum.Therefore rhinologic surgeons should be aware of the increased risk of surgical approach in deviated side.

Özet

Amaç: Septal deviasyonun önemli paranazal yapılara ve sinüs hacimlerine etkisini değerlendirmek. Metod: Septum deviasyonu olan 133 hastanın (67 erkek, 66 kadın; 18 yaş üzeri) paranazal sinüs bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntüleri retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Frontal, etmoid ve maksiler sinüs hacimleri, ostiomeatal kompleks, frontoetmoid reses ve sfenoetmoid reses çapları deviasyon olan ve olmayan tarafta karşılaştırıldı. Konka bülloza varlığı değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Deviasyon açıları 2,7 ile 21,5 derece arasında ortalama olarak 9,7+/- 4,1 olarak ölçüldü. Ortalama ostiometal kompleks genişliği ve frontoetmoid reses çapı deviye tarafta anlamlı olarak daha küçük bulundu (p0,001). Sonuç: Ostiomeatal kompleks çapı, frontoetmoid reses çapı ve etmoid hücre hacmi deviye tarafta daha küçük bulunduğundan rinolojik cerrahilerde deviye tarafta artmış cerrahi risk olabileceği akılda tutulmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

RAMADAN, S. U., DAĞLI, E., BAYRAK, S., ÖZTÜRK, C. (2022). EFFECT OF SEPTAL DEVIATION ON PARANASAL SINUS ANATOMY. KBB-Forum, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 87–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/573114

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Behar PM, Todd NW. (2000) Paranasal sinus development and choanal atresia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 126(2):155-7.
  2. Apuhan T, Yıldırım YS, Özaslan H. (2011) The developmental relation between adenoid tissue and paranasal sinus volumes in 3-dimensional computed tomography assessment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 144(6):964-71
  3. D'Ascanio L, Lancione C, Pompa G, Rebuffini E, Mansi N, Manzini M. (2010)Craniofacial growth in children with nasal septum deviation: a cephalometric comparative study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 74(10):1180-3.
  4. Arslan H, Aydinlioğlu A, Bozkurt M, Egeli E. (1999)Anatomic variations of the paranasal sinuses: CT examination for endoscopic sinus surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx. 26:39-48.
  5. Sazgar AA, Massah J, Sadeghi M, Bagheri A, Rasool E. (2008) The incidence of concha bullosa and the correlation with nasal septal deviation. B-ENT 4(2):87-91.
  6. Firat AK, Miman MC, Firat Y, Karakas HM, Ozturan O, Altinok T. (2006) Effect of nasal septal deviation on total ethmoid cell volume. J Laryngol Otol. 120(3):200-4.
  7. Orhan I, Ormeci T, Aydin S, Altin G, Urger E, Soylu E, Yilmaz F. (2014) Morphometric analysis of the maxillary sinus in patients with nasal septum deviation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 271(4):727-32.
  8. Bolger WE, Clifford AB, Parsons DS. (1991)Paranasal sinusbony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CTanalysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 101:56-64.
  9. Stammberger H, Hawke M. (1993) Essentials of endoscopic sinus surgery. 1. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, pp 43 Spaeth J, Krügelstein U, Schlöndorff G. (1997) The paranasal sinuses in CT-imaging: development from birth to age 25.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 14;39(1):25-40.
  10. Davis WE, Templer J, Parsons DS. (1996)Anatomy of the paranasal sinuses. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 29(1):57-9.
  11. Elahi MM, Frenkiel S, Fageeh N. (1997)Paraseptal structuralchanges and chronic sinus disease in relation to thedeviated septum. J Otolaryngol 26:236-40.
  12. Stallman JS, Lobo JN, Som PM. (2004) The incidence of concha bullosa and its relationship to nasal septal deviation and paranasal sinus disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25(9):1613-8.
  13. Park IH, Song JS, Choi H, Kim TH, Hoon S, Lee SH, Lee HM.( 2010)Volumetric study in the development of paranasal sinuses by CT imaging in Asian: a pilot study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 74(12):1347-50.
  14. Mogensen C, Tos M. (1978)Experimental surgery on the nose airflow andgoblet-cell density. Acta Otolaryngol 86:289-297.
  15. Pritchard JJ, Scott JH, Girgis FG. (1956)The