Journals / KBB-Forum / 2022 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

TIPTRODE ELECTRODE ELECTROCOCHLEOGRAPHY RESPONSES IN ADULTS WITH NORMAL HEARING

NORMAL İŞİTEN YETİŞKİNLERDE TİPTRODE ELEKTROT ELEKTOKOKLEOGRAFİ YANITLARI

Journal
KBB-Forum
Pages
50–56
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Considering the lack of ECochG studies in our country, it has been suggested that creating normative data specific to the use of tiptrode electrodes and similar studies should be planned in the future to add ECochG in routine clinical evaluation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Electrocochleography is the measurement of electrical activity in the cochlea and acoustic nerve in response to acoustic stimuli.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method and Material: The retrospective study conducted between 2016-2021 included 26 young adults between the ages of 21-30 and 20 middle aged adults between the ages of 30-51 without auditory and vestibular complaints.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Considering the lack of ECochG studies in our country, it has been suggested that creating normative data specific to the use of tiptrode electrodes and similar studies should be planned in the future to add ECochG in routine clinical evaluation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016-2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Electrocochleography is the measurement of electrical activity in the cochlea and acoustic nerve in response to acoustic stimuli. It is known that the components of electrocochleography vary depending on the characteristics of the stimulus and the participants. In the literature, there are not enough studies examining the results of electrocochleography recorded with tiptrode electrodes in Turkish population. For this reason, in our study, it was aimed to examine the relationship between the electrocochleography variables recorded by the tiptrode electrode and age and the evaluated ear in individuals with normal hearing. Method and Material: The retrospective study conducted between 2016-2021 included 26 young adults between the ages of 21-30 and 20 middle aged adults between the ages of 30-51 without auditory and vestibular complaints. Electrocochleography test was performed at a rate of 11.3/sec with a 90 dB nHL click stimulus. Results: The SP/AP area ratio of the middle aged adult group was found significantly higher. When the results of the participants were compared as the right and left ears, the AP duration in the right ear was significantly longer. It was observed that AP latencies are prolonged in correlation with age. Conclusion: Considering the lack of ECochG studies in our country, it has been suggested that creating normative data specific to the use of tiptrode electrodes and similar studies should be planned in the future to add ECochG in routine clinical evaluation.

Özet

Giriş: Elektrokokleografi, akustik uyaranlara yanıt olarak koklea ve akustik sinirde oluşan elektriksel aktivitenin ölçümüdür. Elektrokokleografi bileşenlerinin uyaran ve katılımcının özelliklerine bağlı olarak değiştiği bilinmektedir. Literatürde Türk toplumunda tiptrode elektrotlar ile kaydedilen elektrokokleografi sonuçlarını inceleyen yeterli sayıda çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Bu sebeple çalışmamızda normal işiten bireylerde tiptrode elektrot ile kaydedilen elektrokokleografi değişkenlerinin yaş ve değerlendirilen kulakla ilişkisinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem ve Gereçler: 2016-2021 yılları arasında yapılan retrospektif çalışmaya işitsel ve vestibüler şikayeti olmayan 21-30 yaş arası 26 genç yetişkin, 30-51 yaş arası 20 orta yetişkin dahil edilmiştir. Katılımcılara 90 dB nHL şiddetinde klik uyaran ile 11.3/sn ratede elektrokokleografi testi yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Orta yetişkin grubun SP/AP alan oranı anlamlı derecede yüksek elde edilmiştir. Katılımcıların sonuçları sağ ve sol kulak olarak karşılaştırıldığında sağ kulakta AP durasyonu anlamlı derecede uzun elde edilmiştir. AP latanslarının yaş ile korele uzadığı gözlenmiştir. Sonuçlar: Ülkemizde elektrokokleografi çalışmalarının eksikliği göz önüne alındığında, elektrokokleografinin rutin klinik değerlendirilmeye dahil edilebilmesi için uygulama kolaylığı sağlayan tiptrode elektrot kullanımına özgü normatif verilerin oluşturulması ve benzeri çalışmaların arttırılması önerilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞ, N., GEDİK, Ö., BAL, N., BAŞÖZ, M. (2022). TIPTRODE ELECTRODE ELECTROCOCHLEOGRAPHY RESPONSES IN ADULTS WITH NORMAL HEARING. KBB-Forum, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 50–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/573044

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Wever EG, Bray CW. Action currents in the auditory nerve in response to acoustical stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1930;16:344-50
  2. Ruben, R. J., Bordley, J. E., Nager, G. T., et al. (1960). Human cochlea responses to sound stimuli. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 69, 459-479
  3. Lempert J, Wever EG, Lawrence M. The cochleogram and its clinical application; a preliminary report. Arch Otolaryngol. 1947;45:61
  4. Eggermont J. Electrocochleography. In: Auditory system. Berlin: Springer; 1976. p. 625-705
  5. Ferraro, J. A. (2010). Electrocochleography: A review of recording approaches, clinical applications, and new findings in adults and children. J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 145-152
  6. Cullen, J. K., Jr, Ellis, M. S., Berlin, C. I., et al. (1972). Human acoustic nerve action potential recordings from the tympanic membrane without anesthesia. Acta Otolaryngol, 74, 15-22
  7. Jacobson, G. P., Shepard, N. T., Barin, K., Janky, K., & McCaslin, D. L. (Eds.). (2020). Balance function assessment and management. plural publishing
  8. Eggermont JJ. Ups and downs in 75 years of electrocochleography. Front Syst Neurosci. 2017;11:2. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2017.00002
  9. Babu, S., Schutt, C. A., & Bojrab, D. I. (Eds.). (2019). Diagnosis and Treatment of Vestibular Disorders. Springer International Publishing
  10. Ferraro, J. A., Kileny, P. R., & Grasel, S. S. (2019). Electrocochleography: New uses for an old test and normative values. American journal of audiology, 28(3S), 783-795
  11. Dalbert, A., Pfiffner, F., Hoesli, M., et al. (2018). Assessment of cochlear function during cochlear implantation by extra- and intracochlear electrocochleography. Front Neurosci, 12, 18
  12. Weder, S., Bester, C., Collins, A., Shaul, C., Briggs, R. J., & O'Leary, S. (2020). Toward a Better Understanding of Electrocochleography: Analysis of Real-Time Recordings. Ear and hearing, 41(6), 1560-1567
  13. Coats AC, Martin JL, Kidder HR. Normal short-latency electrophysiological filtered click responses recorded from vertex and external auditory meatus. J Acoust Soc Am. 1979;65:747-58
  14. Montandon PB, Shepard NT, Marr EM, et al. Auditory-nerve potentials from ear canals of patients with otologic problems. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1975;84:164-73
  15. Satar, B., Yildirim, A., Karahatay, S., & Sen, D. (2006). Estimation of traveling wave delay of the basilar membrane using frequency-specific electrocochleography: Methodology and normative data. Mediterr J Otol, 2(1), 14-18
  16. Lake, A. B., & Stuart