SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Current Issues in the Evaluation of Teaching and Possible Corrections in the System

Öğretim Değerlendirilmesinde Güncel Sorunlar ve Sistemde Yapılması Mümkün Düzeltmeler

Yücel KAYABAŞI
Pages
537–548
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By the aim of improving teaching using methods of evaluation of teaching more frequently and methods of evaluation on using personals in teaching has been investigated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study the evaluation topic, evaluation of learning has been investigated by different point of views.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Learning and teaching constitutes two main branches of process, which are continuously in interaction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By the aim of improving teaching using methods of evaluation of teaching more frequently and methods of evaluation on using personals in teaching has been investigated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study the evaluation topic, evaluation of learning has been investigated by different point of views. Learning and teaching constitutes two main branches of process, which are continuously in interaction. Evaluation has a meaning and entireness only if it contains these two main branches. The evaluation of learning is directed towards the student, which is the main element of the system and the environment conditions surrounding the student so the evaluation of teaching will be also directed towards the teacher, which is again the main element of the system, and the environment conditions surrounding the teacher. In this study the evaluation of the teachers’ sufficiency in lesson by using students’ opinion has been investigated. By the aim of improving teaching using methods of evaluation of teaching more frequently and methods of evaluation on using personals in teaching has been investigated.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, öğretme-öğrenme sürecinde öğretimin değerlendirilmesi değişik bakış açılarından ele alınıp incelenmiştir. Öğrenme ve öğretme, öğretim sürecinin devamlı etkileşim halinde olan iki ana boyutunu oluşturmaktadır. Değerlendirme ise, ancak bu iki boyutu içermesi durumunda bir anlam ve bütünlük kazanır. Öğretme-öğrenme sürecinde öğretimin değerlendirilmesi nasıl ki öğretim sisteminin asıl öğesi ve konusu olan öğrenciye ve onu çevreleyen koşullara yönelikse, öğretimin değerlendirilmesi de yine sistemin vazgeçilmez öğesi olan ve ona işlerlik kazandıran öğretmene ve onu çevreleyen koşullara yönelik olacaktır. Yine yapılan çalışmada aynı zamanda öğrenci görüşlerine göre öğretmenlerin dersteki yeterliliklerinin değerlendirilmesi konusu ele alınarak, öğretimi iyileştirmek amacıyla öğretim sürecini değerlendirme yöntemlerini daha etkili kullanmada eğitici personelin eğitimi üzerinde durulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYABAŞI, Y. (2022). Current Issues in the Evaluation of Teaching and Possible Corrections in the System. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 537–548. https://ajindex.com/articles/572638

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bhola, H. S. (1990).Evaluating "Literacy for development" projects, programs and campaigns: Evaluation planning, design and implementation, and utilization of evaluation results. Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education; DSE [German Foundation for International Developement]. xii, 306 pages
  2. Cashin, W. E.(1988). StudentRating of Teaching: A Summary of the Research. Center for Faculty Evaloation & Development. Division of Continuing Education Kansas State University. IDEA Paper No:20
  3. Cashin, W. E. (1995). Student Ratings of Teaching: The Research Revisited. Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Idea Paper no.32
  4. Champagne, A.B.L.E.Klopfer. A.T.Dessena, and D.A.Squires. (1981). "Structural Representations of Students' Knowledge before and after Science Instruction." Journal of Research in Science Technology, 18(1981). 97-111.¬ 5. Cohen, P.A. (1993). "Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Metaanalysis of Mııltisection Validity Studies." Review of Educational Research, 51(1993). 281-309
  5. Douglas L. J.Abdum(2007) Juvenile Structured Day Programs for Suspended and Exxpelled Youth: An Evaluation of Process and Impact. Precenting School Failure Vol.51 No: 4 P.47-61
  6. Davis,B.G.L.Wood, and R.C.Wilson. (1993). ABC's of Teaching with Excellence. Berkeley, Calif.:Teaching Innovation and Evaluation Services, University of California, 1993
  7. Doyle, K.O.(1983) Evaluating Teaching. Lexington. Mass.:D.C. H e a t h
  8. Endress S., H. Weston (2007). Examining the Effects of Phono-Graphix on the Remediation of Reading Slcills of Students witl: Disabilities: A Program Evaluation. Educatıon And Treatment of Chıldren Vol. 30, No. 2, P.1-20 2007 10. Erden, M. (2004) Eğitimde Program Değerlendirme. Ankara, Anı Yayıncılık
  9. Black P (2003) Formative and Summative Assessment: Can they serve learning together? Paper presented at the AERA Chicago Meeting Chicago, 23 April 2003
  10. Black P and Harrison C (2004) Science inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the science classroom. London: 13. Nfer Nelson, Kansas State University.(1986). " IDEA Sıırvey Forın - Student Reactions to Instruction and Course." Manhattan. Kans.: Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development in Higher Education, 1986
  11. Kayabaşı,Y.Ş.Tan.(2003).Öğretimi Planlama ve Değerlendirme. Ankara, Anı Yayıncılık
  12. Kyriacou, C. (1995).Effective Teaching in Schools. U.K.:Stanley Thornes (Publishers) Ltd. Ellenborough House, Wellington Street. 16.