SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

The Analysis of Privileged Factors Affective in Selecting Mathematics TEaching Department Through Analytic Hierarchy Process Method of Freshmen in Gazi University, Gazi Faculty of Education, Primary Mathematics Teaching Department

Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenliği Programı Birinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Bu Programı Seçmelerinde Etkili Olan Öncelikli Faktörlerin Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi Metodu ile Analizi

Sebahat YETİM
Pages
589–606
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Saaty in 1977, has been examined, and after that an assessment and implementation of freshmen’s privileged factors in selecting Primary Math Teaching Department of Gazi University, Gazi Faculty of Education have been handled through AHP method that is one of the multiple decision making criteria.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, theoretical principles and mechanisms of Analytic Hierarchy Process, developed and brought in the literature by Thomas L.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, theoretical principles and mechanisms of Analytic Hierarchy Process, developed and brought in the literature by Thomas L.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Saaty in 1977, has been examined, and after that an assessment and implementation of freshmen’s privileged factors in selecting Primary Math Teaching Department of Gazi University, Gazi Faculty of Education have been handled through AHP method that is one of the multiple decision making criteria.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, theoretical principles and mechanisms of Analytic Hierarchy Process, developed and brought in the literature by Thomas L. Saaty in 1977, has been examined, and after that an assessment and implementation of freshmen’s privileged factors in selecting Primary Math Teaching Department of Gazi University, Gazi Faculty of Education have been handled through AHP method that is one of the multiple decision making criteria.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Thomas L. Saaty tarafından 1977 yılında geliştirilen ve literatüre kazandırılan Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP)’nin kuramsal temelleri ve işleyişi incelenmiş ve Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenliği Programı birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin bu programı seçmelerinde etkili olan öncelikli faktörlerinin çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinden biri olan AHP yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi ve bir uygulaması ele alınmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YETİM, S. (2022). The Analysis of Privileged Factors Affective in Selecting Mathematics TEaching Department Through Analytic Hierarchy Process Method of Freshmen in Gazi University, Gazi Faculty of Education, Primary Mathematics Teaching Department. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 589–606. https://ajindex.com/articles/572600

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Albayrak, C., Albayrak, E., 1995, Kredi Talepleri’nin Değerlendirilmesinde Analitik Hiyerarşi Yönteminin Kullanılması, Kara Harp okulu, 1 nci Sistem Mühendisliği ve Savunma Uygulamaları Sempozyumu, Bildiriler-1, 593-599
  2. Barbeau, E. (1987), Reciprocal Matrices of Order 4, Mathematical Modelling, 9/3-5, 321-326
  3. Basak, I. and SAATY, T. (1993), Group Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Mathl. Comput. Modelling, 17/4-5, 101-110
  4. Crawford, G.B. (1987), The Geometric Mean Procedure for Estimating the Scale of a Judgment Matrix, Mathematical Modelling, 9/3-5, 327-334
  5. Golden, B.L., Wang, Q., 1989, An Alternate Measure of Consisitency, College of Business and Managment Universty of Maryland College Park
  6. Harker, P.T. and VARGAS, L.G. (1987), The Theory of Ratio Scale Estimation: Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process, Management Science, 33/11, 1383-1403
  7. Lusk, J.R. (1979), Analysis of Hospital Capital Decision Alternative: Apriority Assingment Model, JORS, 30, 439–448
  8. Saary, T. (1991), Some Mathematical Concepts of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Behaviormetrica, No.29, 1–9
  9. Saaty, T. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill International Book Company
  10. Saaty, T. (2000b), Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory, RWS Publications, Vol.6, Pittsburgh
  11. Saaty, T. (1990), Physice as a Decision Theory, EJOR, 48 (1990) 98–104
  12. Saaty, T. (1999), The Seven Pillars of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 322 Mervis Hall, Pittsburgh. E-mail: 13. Saaty, T. (2000a), Decision Making for Leaders, RWS Publications, 1999/2000 Edition, Pittsburgh
  13. Uyar, Y. (Mayıs 2001), Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara
  14. Ülengin, F., 1994, Ulaşım Problemlerine Analitik Hiyerarşi Yaklaşımı: İstanbul İçin Bir Uygulama, TMMOB İstanbul 2. Kent İçi Ulaşım Kongresi Bildirileri, 103-121
  15. Vargas, L.G. (1983), Analysis of Sensitivity of Reciprocal Matrices, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 12, 201–220
  16. Vargas, L.G. (1986), Utility Theory and Reciprocal Painvise Comparisons: The Eigenvector Method, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 20/6, 387-391
  17. Vargas, L.G. (1990), An Overview ofthe Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Application, EJOR, 48/1, 2-8
  18. Weiss, E.N. (1987), Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in a Dynamic Environment, Mathematical Modelling, 9/3–5, 285–292
  19. Yetim, S. (2004), Tek Değişkenli Reel Değerli Fonksiyonlarda Türev Kavramına Etki Eden Bazı Matematik Kavra