Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

An alternative method on improvement of history teaching: Oral history

Tarih öğretiminin iyileştirilmesi yolunda alternatif bir yöntem: Sözlü tarih

Pages
669–688
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, it has been discussed what the historians and educators should attend while making oral history studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Oral history as a historical research method provides important data, perspectives and application opportunities for historiography and history teaching.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Oral history has been out of the agenda of the historians for a long time even it goes back to old times.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, it has been discussed what the historians and educators should attend while making oral history studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Oral history as a historical research method provides important data, perspectives and application opportunities for historiography and history teaching. Oral history has been out of the agenda of the historians for a long time even it goes back to old times. However, it became the method that the researchers referred as a rich research and the data source especially after the II. World War. In this research, first it has been interpreted what the oral history is, its historical past and its form of perception today. After this, it has been mentioned the value that the oral history conveys in terms of historiography, history education and the society and from which angles the oral history is criticized as a method. Finally, it has been discussed what the historians and educators should attend while making oral history studies.

Özet

Sözlü tarih, bir araştırma yöntemi olarak tarih yazıcılığı ve öğretimi için önemli veriler, bakış açıları ve uygulama olanakları sağlamaktadır. Geçmişi çok eskiye dayansa da sözlü tarih uzunca bir dönem tarihçilerin gündemi dışında kalmıştır. Özellikle II. Dünya Savaşı sonrasında ise zengin bir araştırma ve veri kaynağı olarak araştırmacıların başvurduğu bir yöntem haline gelmiştir. Bu araştırmada öncelikle sözlü tarihin ne olduğu, tarihsel geçmişi ve günümüzdeki algılanış biçimi değerlendirilmiştir. Ardından sözlü tarihin tarihçilik, tarih eğitimi ve toplum açısından taşıdığı değerden bahsedilmiş ve bir yöntem olarak ne açılardan eleştirildiği konusuna değinilmiştir. Son olarak ise tarihçiler ve eğitimcilerin sözlü tarih çalışması yaparken nelere dikkat etmeleri gerektiği konusu işlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AVCI, A. A., ASLAN, E. (2022). An alternative method on improvement of history teaching: Oral history. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 669–688. https://ajindex.com/articles/572296

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E.K., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi
  2. Caunce, S. (2001). Sözlü Tarih ve Yerel Tarihçi. B. Bülent Can, Alper Yalçınkaya (Çev.). İstanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı
  3. Crabtree, C. (1989). Improving History in the Schools. Educational Leadership, 47 (3), 25- 28
  4. Cutler III, W.W. (1971). Oral History: Its Nature and Uses for Educational History. History of Education Quarterly, 11 (2), 184-194
  5. Danacıoğlu, E. (2001). Geçmişin İzleri: Yanıbaşımızdaki Tarih İçin Bir Kılavuz. İstanbul: Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı
  6. Demircioğlu, İ.H. (2007). Tarih Öğretiminde Öğrenci Merkezli Yaklaşımlar. Ankara: Anı
  7. Dillon, P. (2000). Teaching the Past through Oral History. The Journal of American History, 87 (2), 602-605
  8. Dunaway, D.K., Baum, W.K. (Ed.) (1996). Oral History: An Interdisciplinary Anthology. Walnut Creek: AltaMira
  9. Ebner, M.H. (1976). Students as Oral Historians. The History Teacher, 9 (2), 196-201
  10. Ede, L.S. (1977). Oral History: One Way out of the Slough of Despond. College Composition and Communication, 28 (4), 380-382
  11. Epstein, T. (2003). Review: The Past, Present, and Future of Research on History Education. Educational Researcher, 32 (4), 29-32
  12. Fink, L. (2001). New Tidings for History Education, or Lessons We Should Have Learned by Now. The History Teacher, (34 (2), 235-242
  13. Fonsino, F.J. (1980). Criteria for Evaluating Oral History Interviews. The History Teacher, 13 (2), 239-243
  14. Grele, R.J. (2003). Movement Without Aim: Methodological and Theoretical Problems in Oral History. Robert Perks ve Alistair Thomson (Ed.), The Oral History Reader içinde (s. 38-52). Londra: Routledge
  15. Hagopian, P. (2000). Voices from Vietnam: Veterans’ Oral Histories in the Classroom. The Journal of American History, 87 (2), 593-601
  16. Hudson, L.E., Santora, E.D. (2003). Oral History: An Inclusive Highway to the Past. The History Teacher, 36 (2), 206-220
  17. Illisevich, R.D. (1972). Oral History in Undergraduate Research. The History Teacher, 6 (1), 47-50
  18. Lehane, S., Goldman, R. (1977). Oral History: Research and Teaching Tool for Educators. The Elementary School Journal, 77 (39), 173-181
  19. Long, R.D. (1991). The Personal Dimension in Doing Oral History. The History Teacher, 24 (3), 307-312
  20. McAdoo, H. (1980). Oral History as a Primary Resource in Educational Research. The Journal of Negro Edu