Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

The effect of teaching with analogies model on conceptual understanding of $9^{th}$ grade students’ chemical bonding concepts

Benzeşimlerle öğretim modelinin 9. sınıf öğrencilerinin kimyasal bağlar konusundaki kavramsal anlamaları üzerine etkisi

Pages
805–821
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to that, it was also found out that the students whose prior knowledge and logical thinking abilities are greater are better at understanding chemical bonds.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of teaching with analogies model on how 9th grade students understand chemical bonds.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study in which pre-posttest quasi-experimental design were used was conducted in two different classes consisting of 48 students with the same teacher.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to that, it was also found out that the students whose prior knowledge and logical thinking abilities are greater are better at understanding chemical bonds.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of teaching with analogies model on how 9th grade students understand chemical bonds. This study in which pre-posttest quasi-experimental design were used was conducted in two different classes consisting of 48 students with the same teacher. The subject matter chemical bond was covered on the basis of teaching with analogies model the experimental group while it was covered on the basis of traditional teaching approach in the control group. The data gained was analyzed using t-test and ANCOVA statistical techniques. That the teaching with analogies model was more effective than traditional teaching approach in teaching chemical bonds was found out. In addition to that, it was also found out that the students whose prior knowledge and logical thinking abilities are greater are better at understanding chemical bonds.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, 9. sınıf öğrencilerinin kimyasal bağlar konusunu anlamalarında benzeşimlerle öğretim modelinin etkisini incelemektir. Öntest-sontest kontrol gruplu yarı deneysel desenin kullanıldığı bu çalışmada; dersler aynı öğretmenin yürüttüğü iki sınıfta 48 öğrencinin katılımıyla gerçekleştirildi. Kimyasal bağlar konusu deney grubunda benzeşimlerle öğretim modeli, kontrol grubunda ise geleneksel öğretim yaklaşımına dayalı düz anlatım modeli ile işlendi. Elde edilen veriler t-testi ve ANCOVA istatistiksel teknikleriyle analiz edildi. Benzeşimlerle öğretim modelinin öğrencilerin kimyasal bağlar konusunu anlamalarında düz anlatım modeline göre daha etkili olduğu tespit edildi. Bunun yanında ön bilgileri ve mantıksal düşünme yetenekleri daha fazla olan öğrencilerin kimyasal bağlar konusunu daha iyi anladıkları belirlendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKUŞ, H., KILIÇ, D., ATASOY, B., KADAYIFÇ, H. (2022). The effect of teaching with analogies model on conceptual understanding of $9^{th}$ grade students’ chemical bonding concepts. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 805–821. https://ajindex.com/articles/572211

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Akkuş, H. (2004). Kavramsal değişim metinlerinin kimyasal denge başarısı üzerine etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi,
  2. Ankara.
  3. Aksu, M, Berberoğlu, G. ve F. Paykoç. (1990). “Can the GALT test be used in a Different Cultural Setting?”, Research Report. Atasoy, B. (2004). Fen öğrenimi ve öğretimi. Ankara:
  4. Asil Yayın. Atasoy, B., Genç, E., Kadayıfçı, H. ve Akkuş, H. (2007). Theeffect of cooperative learning to grade 7 students understanding of physical and chemical changes topic. Hacette Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 12-21
  5. Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View (New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston). Black, D., and Solomon, J. (1987). Can pupils use taught analogies for electric current? School Science Review, 69, 249-254.
  6. Cady, S. G. (1997). “Use of Pom Pons to Illustrate Cubic Crystal Structures”. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(7), 794-795.
  7. Chiapetta, E., and J.M. Russell. 1982. The relationship among logical thinking, problem solving instruction, and knowledge and application of earth science subject matter. Science Education, 66, 85–93.
  8. Clement, A. (2002),
  9. Learning with Analogies, Cases and Computers. The journal of the learning science. 11(1), 127-138.
  10. Coll, R. K. (2006). The role of models, mental models, and analogies in chemistry teaching. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 65–78).
  11. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Çalık, M., Ayas, A. and Coll, R.(2009). Investigating the effectiveness of an analogy activity in improving students’ conceptual change for solution chemistry concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 74(4), 651-676.
  12. Çetingül, İ., ve Geban, Ö. (2011). Kavramsal değişim metinleriyle verilen analojilerin asitbaz konusundaki kavram yanılgıları için kullanımı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41, 112-123.
  13. Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649-672.
  14. Gabel, D.L. (1993). Use of The Particle Nature of Matter In Developing Conceptual Understanding. Journal of chemical education, 70, 193-194.
  15. Geban, Ö., Aşkar, P., & Özkan, I. (1992). Effects of computer simulations and problems solving approaches on high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 5–10
  16. Glynn, S. M. (1991). Explaining science concepts: A teaching-with-analogies model. In S. Glynn, R. Yeany, and B. Britton (Eds.). The psychology of lear