Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Gelişmekte olan bir Üniversitede akademik bilgi ve kişisel bilgi yönetimi: Bir örnek durum çalışması

Academic knowledge and personal knowledge management in a developing University: A Case study

Pages
1229–1242
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Significant differences were found in all dimensions between the staff who had publications at national scientific meetings and those who hadn t.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to find out the approaches of academic staff towards Personal Knowledge Management (PKM) in a developing university in Northern Cyprus by focusing on the four PKM strategies and techniques, i.e. obtaining, saving, using, and sharing knowledge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings suggest that in this developing university, general attitudes of the staff towards PKM strategies are positive.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Significant differences were found in all dimensions between the staff who had publications at national scientific meetings and those who hadn t.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to find out the approaches of academic staff towards Personal Knowledge Management (PKM) in a developing university in Northern Cyprus by focusing on the four PKM strategies and techniques, i.e. obtaining, saving, using, and sharing knowledge. The study was designed as a case study where a questionnaire was distributed to all academics at the university. Mean scores and independent sample t-tests were used in the analysis. The findings suggest that in this developing university, general attitudes of the staff towards PKM strategies are positive. However, while strategies for effectively using and saving knowledge were widely used, strategies for obtaining new information and sharing it with colleagues were not so popular. Significant differences were found in all dimensions between the staff who had publications at national scientific meetings and those who hadn t.

Özet

Bu çalışma Kuzey Kıbrısta gelişmekte olan bir üniversitede çalışan akademik personelin Kişisel Bilgi Yönetimine (KBY) karşı olan tutumlarını bilgi edinme, saklama, kullanma ve paylaşma boyutlarını ele alarak incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma bir durum çalışması olarak desenlenmiş olup, üniversitedeki tüm akademik personele konuyla ilgili hazırlanan bir anket dağıtılmıştır. Veri analizi ortalama ve t-test hesaplamaları kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular sözkonusu üniversitede akademik personelin KBYne olan genel tutumlarının olumlu olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ancak, bilgiyi kullanma ve saklama yöntemleri etkili biçimde kullanılırken, yeni bilgi edinme ve bilgi paylaşımına yönelik yöntemlerin akademisyenler arasında pek yaygın olmadığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Analiz edilen tüm boyutlarda ulusal toplantılarda bilimsel yayını bulunan ve bulunmayan akademisyenler arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklar bulunmştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUNBOYLU, H., ÇAVUŞOĞLU, Ç. (2022). Gelişmekte olan bir Üniversitede akademik bilgi ve kişisel bilgi yönetimi: Bir örnek durum çalışması. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 1229–1242. https://ajindex.com/articles/572179

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Barutçugil, İ. (2002). Bilgi Yönetimi [Knowledge management]. İstanbul:
  2. Kariyer. Başaran, M. (2002). İşletmelerde bilginin yönetilmesi ile ilgili olarak geliştirilen modeller ve bir araştırma [Models developed related to knowledge management in business organizations and a case study]. Unpublished MBA thesis. İstanbul:
  3. İstanbul University. Baykasoğlu, N. (2012). A museum example in art and design education. Global Journal of Arts Education, 2, 1-6
  4. Becerra-Fernandez, I., & Stevenson, J. M. (2001). Knowledge management systems & solutions for the school principal as chief learning officer. Education, 21(3), 508-518.
  5. Benli, E. (2011). The effect online-based prepared posters on students attitude toward science and technology course. Global Journal of Information Technology, 1, 1-4
  6. Birol, C., Dağlı, G., & Silman, F. (2010). Usage of knowledge management tools: UK and Canada versus Russia and Turkey in a comparative study. Euroasian Journal of Educational Research, 38. Coukos-Semmel, E. (2003). Knowledge management in research universities: The processes and strategies. Chicago, IL: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 21-25 April 2003 (ERIC document no: ED477439). Çınar, İ., Çakmak, S. & Uzunboylu, H. (2009). The evaluation of attitudes’ towards research of the students’ studying library database via Moodle. International Journal of Lerning and Teaching, 1(1), 2-9.
  7. Dereceli, Ç. (2011). The effect of tai-chi on internal- external locus of control levels in primary school students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Global Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 1, 8-14
  8. Elmhodt, C. (2004). Knowledge management and the practice of knowledge sharing and learning at work: A case study. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 327-339.
  9. Eriş, H. (2012). Competencies of primary school administrators in implementing managerial knowledge management in North Cyprus. Cypriot Journal of Educatial Sciences, 7(3), 177-188.
  10. Fullan, M. (2002). The role of leadership in the promotion of knowledge management in schools. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 409-419.
  11. Gorelick, C., April, K., Milton, N. (2004). Performance through learning: Knowledge management in practice. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann. Hellstöm, T. (2004). Between a rock and a hard place: Academic institutional change and the problem of collective action. Higher Education, 48, 511-528.
  12. Henczel, S. (2004). Supporting the KM environment: The roles, responsib