SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Teoriden Uygulamaya Geçiş: Okul Deneyimi Sürecindeki Matematik İle Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Öğretmen Adaylarının Karşılaştırılması

Transition From Theory To Practice: A Comparison Of Math and Computer Education And Instructional Technology Teachers During School Experience

Polat ŞENDURUR
Emine ŞENDURUR
Rezan YILMAZ
Pages
1517–1532
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In general, both groups of prospective teachers showed similar approaches, but prospective CEIT teachers were more concerned about technological infrastructural problems

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to understand the experiences faced during school experience period of either prospective Math or Computer Education and Instructional Technology (CEIT) teachers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected from 11 participants.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In general, both groups of prospective teachers showed similar approaches, but prospective CEIT teachers were more concerned about technological infrastructural problems
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to understand the experiences faced during school experience period of either prospective Math or Computer Education and Instructional Technology (CEIT) teachers. Highlighting the differences and similarities between prospective Math and CEIT teachers is also one of the purposes. Data were collected from 11 participants. The findings suggested that selection of mentors and practice schools have great importance as well as the true guidance of the university supervisor. Most of the participants agreed on the inadequacies of the connection between what is taught in campus and what happens in schools. In general, both groups of prospective teachers showed similar approaches, but prospective CEIT teachers were more concerned about technological infrastructural problems

Özet

Bu çalışma, Matematik ile Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri (BT) öğretmen adaylarının okul deneyimi sürecindeki tecrübelerini incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın odaklarından birisi, Matematik ve BT öğretmen adayları arasındaki benzerlikler ve farklılıkları ortaya koymaktır. Veriler 11 katılımcıdan elde edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, mentor ve uygulama okulu seçimlerinin, üniversitelerdeki danışmanların rehberliği kadar önemli olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Katılımcıların çoğu, üniversitedeki öğretilenlerle okullarda uygulananlar arasındaki ilişkilendirmenin yetersiz olduğunu düşünmektedir. Genel olarak, her iki bölümün öğretmen adaylarının benzer düşünceler sergilediği ancak BT öğretmen adaylarının daha çok okullardaki teknik altyapının yetersizliği ile ilgili endişelere sahip olduğu görülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENDURUR, P., ŞENDURUR, E., YILMAZ, R. (2022). Teoriden Uygulamaya Geçiş: Okul Deneyimi Sürecindeki Matematik İle Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Öğretmen Adaylarının Karşılaştırılması. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 1517–1532. https://ajindex.com/articles/572029

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bates A. J., Ramirez, L., & Drits, D. (2009).Connectıng unıversıty supervision and critical reflecti- on: mentoring and modeling. The Teacher Educator, 44, 90-112,
  2. Beck, C., & Kosnik, C. (2002). Components of a good practicum placement: student teacher per- ceptions, Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2), 81-98.
  3. Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416-440.
  4. Carter, K., & Anders, D. (1996). Program pedagogy. The teacher educator's handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers, 557-592.
  5. Cochran, K. F. (1993). Pedagogical Content Knowing: An Integrative Model for Teacher Preparati- on. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263-272.
  6. Coşkun, A., & Daloğlu, A. (2010). Evaluating an English Language Teacher Education Program through Peacock's Model. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 24-42.
  7. Cothran D. J., Kulinna, P. H., & Garrahy D. A. (2003). ''This is kind of giving a secret away.'': students' perspectives on effective class management. Teaching and Teacher Education 19. 435-444.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-Century Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314.
  9. De Lange, J. (1996). Using and applying mathematics in education. In: A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 49-97). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  10. Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Sadık, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59(2), 423-435.
  11. Everhart, B., & Turner, E. (1996). Preservice clinical experiences. The Journal of Physical Educa- tion, Recreation, & Dance, 67(4), 62-65.
  12. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice. Designing a continuum to strengten and sustain teaching. Teachers' College Record, 103, 1013-1055.
  13. Fırat, H.B., & Yaratan, H. (2013). Impact of external examinations on high school curricula: Perceptions of teachers and students. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 53(A), 1-18.
  14. Friedman, B., & Khan, P.H. (1994). Educating computer scientists: linking the social and the tech- nical. Communications of the ACM, 37(1), 65-70. Fry