SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2 (10.yıl özel sayısı)

Investigation of Metacognitive Reading Skills of Good and Poor Readers: A Case Study

İyi ve Zayıf Okuyucuların Üstbilişsel Okuma Becerilerinin İncelenmesi: Bir Durum Çalışması1

Hayriye Gül KURUYER
Gökhan ÖZSOY
Pages
771–788
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the end of the study, it was found that metacognitive reading skills vary depending on reading levels.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the present study is to investigate the metacognitive reading skills demonstrated by good and poor readers while reading.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study was conducted with 8 fourth grade students from the city of Aksaray in 2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the end of the study, it was found that metacognitive reading skills vary depending on reading levels.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to investigate the metacognitive reading skills demonstrated by good and poor readers while reading. In the study, case study method was employed to investigate the metacognitive reading skills. The present study was conducted with 8 fourth grade students from the city of Aksaray in 2012. The data related to metacognitive reading skills of the participants were collected through Ekwall/ Shanker Reading Inventory, check list and observations. For the analysis of the data, the notes were organized, encoded, summarized and interpreted by analyzing the information in the check list and observation records. At the end of the study, it was found that metacognitive reading skills vary depending on reading levels. In light of this finding, it was concluded that young children use many reading strategies unconsciously as they are not aware of them.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı iyi ve zayıf okuyucuların okuma sırasında gösterdikleri üstbilişsel okuma becerilerini incelemektir. Araştırmada, öğrencilerin üstbilişsel okuma becerilerini incelemek amacıyla durum çalışması kullanılmıştır. Bu araştırma 2012 yılında Aksaray ilinde sekiz dördüncü sınıf öğrencisiyle yürütülmüştür. Katılımcıların üstbilişsel okuma becerilerine ilişkin veriler, Ekwall/Shanker okuma envanteri, kontrol listesi ve gözlem yoluyla elde edilmiştir. Verilerin analizi için alan notları düzenlenmiş, kontrol listesinde yer alan bilgiler ve gözlem kayıtları ile elde edilen veriler incelenerek kodlanmış, özetlenmiş ve yorumlanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda, okuma düzeylerine göre üstbilişsel okuma becerilerinin farklılaştığı görülmüştür. Bu sonuç doğrultusunda, küçük yaşlarda çocukların okumaya ilişkin birçok strateji kullandığını ancak bunların farkında olmadığı kanısına varılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KURUYER, H. G., ÖZSOY, G. (2022). Investigation of Metacognitive Reading Skills of Good and Poor Readers: A Case Study. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2 (10.yıl özel sayısı), 771–788. https://ajindex.com/articles/572016

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Afflerbach, P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers a main idea construction strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 31-46.
  2. Akyol, H. (2005). Türkçe ilk okuma yazma öğretimi. Ankara:
  3. Pegem A. Akyol, H. (2006). Türkçe ilk okuma yazma öğretimi. Ankara:
  4. Kök Yayıncılık. Allen K., D. & Hancock, T., E. (2008). Reading comprehension improvement with individualized cognitive profiles and metacognition. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47 (2), 124-139, DOI: 10.1080/19388070801938320. Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theories and methods (4th. Ed.) New York: Pearson Education Group, (pp. 110-120).
  5. Brown, A.L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R.J. Spiro, B. Bruce, W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum. Brown, A.L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, selfregulation, and other even more myste- rious mechanisms, In Weinert, F.E. Kluwe, R.H. (eds.) Metacognition, motivation and unders- tanding, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bråten, I., Amundsen, A., & Samuelstuen, S. M. (2010). Poor Readers- Good Learns: A Study of Dyslexic Readers Learning with and without Text. Reading ve Writing, 26, 166-187.
  6. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Profiles of children specific reading comprehension difficulties. Bri- tish Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 683-696.
  7. Cook, D. M. (1989). Meta-cognitive behaviours of good and poor readers. Strategic learning in the content areas. Madison, WI; Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. Coutinho, S. A. (2007). The relationship between goals, metacognition and academic success. Edu- cate~, 7(1), 39-47.
  8. Çakıroğlu, A. (2007). Üstbiliş. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(2)- 21-27.
  9. Çakıroğlu, A. & Ataman, A. (2008). Üstbilişsel strateji öğretiminin okuduğunu anlama Başarı düzeyi düşük öğrencilerde erişi artırımına etkisi. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16, 1-13
  10. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Marison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. (6th Edition). New- york: Routhledge. Dermitzaki, I., Andreou, G., & Paraskeva, V. (2008). High and low reading comprehension achie- vers' strategic behaviors and their relation to performance in a reading comprehension situation. Reading Psychology, 29, 471-492.
  11. Desoete, A. (2008). Multi-method assessment of metacognitive skills in elementary school children: How you test is what you get. Metacognition and Learning