SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

İngilizce Hazırlık Okulu Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme Stilleri ve Başarı Puanlarının Öğrenme Stilleri ve Cinsiyetleri

Learning Styles Of English Preparatory School Students and The Relationship Of Their Proficiency With Learning Styles and Gender

Fatih GÜNGÖR
Demet YAYLI
Gülsün SOFRACI
Dilek ÇELİK
Pages
1055–1070
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the most prevailing learning styles were diverging and accommodating.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine the learning styles of English Preparatory School students, and examine the relationship between their proficiency scores, and their learning styles and gender.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A sample of 263 students participated in the study, and their learning styles were determined by using Kolb's Learning Style Inventory (LSI).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that the most prevailing learning styles were diverging and accommodating.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to determine the learning styles of English Preparatory School students, and examine the relationship between their proficiency scores, and their learning styles and gender. A sample of 263 students participated in the study, and their learning styles were determined by using Kolb's Learning Style Inventory (LSI). It was found that the most prevailing learning styles were diverging and accommodating. However, no statistical significance could be found in the relationship between their gender, and proficiency scores and learning styles. As a conclusion of this study, educators should be skeptical about categorizing learners in a single category

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı İngilizce Hazırlık Okulu öğrencilerinin öğrenme stillerini tespit etmek ve başarı puanları ile öğrenme stilleri ve cinsiyetleriyle arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktır. Çalışmaya 263 hazırlık okulu öğrencisi katılmış ve bunların öğrenme stilleri Kolb'un Öğrenme Stilleri Envanteri ile belirlenmiştir. En baskın öğrenme stilleri değiştiren ve yerleştirendir. Öte yandan, öğrencilerin öğrenme stilleri ve başarı puanlarının cinsiyetlerine göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark taşımadığı bulunmuştur. Mevcut çalışmanın sonucu olarak eğitimcilerin öğrenenleri tek bir kategori içerisine alma konusunda şüpheci olmaları önerilmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNGÖR, F., YAYLI, D., SOFRACI, G., ÇELİK, D. (2022). İngilizce Hazırlık Okulu Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme Stilleri ve Başarı Puanlarının Öğrenme Stilleri ve Cinsiyetleri. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 1055–1070. https://ajindex.com/articles/571983

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aşkar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (1993). Kolb öğrenme stili envanteri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 17(87), 37-47.
  2. Bahar, H. H., Özen, Y., & Gülaçtı, F. (2009). An investigation on academic achievement and learning styles as to branches and gender from faculty of education students'. Ankara University, Jour- nal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 42(1), 69-86.
  3. Brandt, R. (1990). On the learning styles: A conversation with Pat Guild. Educational Leadership, 48, 10-12.
  4. Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher educa- tion. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(6), 1057-1068.
  5. Can, Ş. (2011). Investigation of the relationships between the learning styles of preservice elementary teachers and some variables. H. U. Journal of Education, 41, 70-82.
  6. Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419-444.
  7. Castro, O., & Peck, V. (2005). Learning styles and foreign language learning difficulties. Foreign Language Annals, 38(3), 401-409.
  8. Clark-Thayer, S. (1987). The relationship of the knowledge of student perceived learning-style pre- ferences, and study habits and attitudes to achievement of college freshmen in a small urban university. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48(04), 872A. Coşkun, N. & Yıldız-Demirtaş, V. (2015). The achievement and anxiety levels of secondary school stu- dents in Math lesson according to their learning styles. K.Ü. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 23(2), 549- 564. Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Cullen, D. J., Pearson, M., Saha, L. J., & Spear, R. H. (1994). Establishing effective PhD supervision. Canberra: AGPS. Çelik, F., & Şahin, H. (2011). Beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenliği öğretmen adaylarının cinsiyet ve öğrenim gördükleri sınıf düzeyleri bakınmından öğrenme stillerinin incelenmesi (MAKÜ örneği). Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31, 23-38.
  10. Çelik, F., Yalçın, R., Gök Çatal, Ö., & Aydın, A. (2014). Investigating the learning styles of pre-service teachers in terms of some variables. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 114-129.
  11. Çetin, M. Ç. (2014) Evaluation of the correlation between learning styles and critical thinking dispositions of the students of school of physical education and sports. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(18), 680-690.
  12. Demir, T. (