Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

Swimming in The Research Methodology: Doctoral Students' Erasmus IP Experiences

Araştırma Yöntemleri Denizinde Yüzmek: Doktora Öğrencilerinin Erasmus Yoğun Program (IP) Deneyimleri

Pages
1203–1220
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the findings it was determined that IP allows participants to progress in the context of individual and research methods, there was individual responsibilities in IP process and the process allows to face to face interaction.Increasing the number of similar projects are recommended for researchers and practitioners

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Erasmus Intensive Programme: Doctoral Studies in Research Methodologies is a shortterm study programme joining students and supervisors from various doctoral institutions representing the participants' countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study utilized a qualitative, phenomenological design. 10 semi-structured interviews be conducted with students who engaged in international learning opportunities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the findings it was determined that IP allows participants to progress in the context of individual and research methods, there was individual responsibilities in IP process and the process allows to face to face interaction.Increasing the number of similar projects are recommended for researchers and practitioners
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Erasmus Intensive Programme: Doctoral Studies in Research Methodologies is a shortterm study programme joining students and supervisors from various doctoral institutions representing the participants' countries. The main aim of the programme is to enhance the experience of doctoral studies across the participating universities. The purpose of this study is to investigate the perspectives of PhD candidates who have engaged in an international doctoral project about qualitative methodology. During the two weeks project process, participants had carried out intercultural experiences and interactions about qualitative research methodological perspectives from different supervisors. This study utilized a qualitative, phenomenological design. 10 semi-structured interviews be conducted with students who engaged in international learning opportunities. The interviews be coded and analyzed using interpretative phenomenological approach. Based on the findings it was determined that IP allows participants to progress in the context of individual and research methods, there was individual responsibilities in IP process and the process allows to face to face interaction.Increasing the number of similar projects are recommended for researchers and practitioners

Özet

Yoğunlaştırılmış Erasmus Programı: Doktora Çalışmalarında Araştırma Yöntemleri, çeşitli ülkelerin enstitülerini temsil eden öğrenci ve öğretim elemanlarının katıldığı kısa süreli bir programdır. Programın temel amacı, katılımcı üniversitelerin doktora düzeyindeki araştırma deneyimlerini genişletmektir. Bu araştırmanın amacı, nitel araştırma hakkında uluslararası bir projeye katılan doktora öğrencilerinin bakış açılarını ortaya çıkarmaktır. İki haftalık proje süresince, katılımcılar kültürler arası etkileşim ve farklı danışmanlarla nitel araştırmaya ilişkin etkileşimde bulunmuşlardır. Bu araştırma fenomenoloji deseninde nitel bir araştırmadır. Uluslararası öğrenme fırsatı yaşamış 10 doktora öğrencisi ile yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Görüşmeler yorumlayıcı fenomenolojik yaklaşım kullanılarak kodlanmış ve analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada elde edilen bulgulara dayalı olarak IP'nin katılımcıların bireysel ve araştırma yöntemleri bağlamında gelişimine olanak sağladığı, IP sürecinde bireysel sorumlulukların bulunduğu ve sürecin yüz yüze etkileşime olanak sağladığı sonuçları yer almaktadır. Benzer projelerin sayısının artırılması araştırmacı ve uygulayıcılar açısından önerilmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

ERSOY, A., ÖNCÜL, B. (2022). Swimming in The Research Methodology: Doctoral Students' Erasmus IP Experiences. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 1203–1220. https://ajindex.com/articles/571852

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1987). Membership roles in field research (Vol. 6). Sage. Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). Growing and developing as a university researcher. Higher Education, 55(2), 241-254.
  2. APEC (2010). Skills and competencies needed in the research field objectives 2020. http://www. eurocadres.org/IMG/pdf/APEC_EN_Skills_and_competencies_needed.pdf 02.02.2015 tarihinde edinilmiştir. adresinden Barrett, A. M., Crossley, M., & Dachi, H. A. (2011). International collaboration and research ca- pacity building: Learning from the EdQual experience. Comparative Education, 47(1), 25-43.
  3. Beerkens, M., & Vossensteyn, H. (2011). The effect of the Erasmus Programme on European High- er Education. In Reform of Higher Education in Europe (pp. 45-62).
  4. Sense Publishers.
  5. Bennett, M. J. (1998). Intercultural communication: A current perspective. Basic concepts of inter- cultural communication: Selected readings, s. 1-34.
  6. Biasutti, M. (2014). An intensive programme on education for sustainable development: the partici- pants' experience. Environmental Education Research, (ahead-of-print), 1-19.
  7. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Educa- tion, 26(3), 271-285.
  8. Bruce, C., Pham, B., & Stoodley, I. (2004). Constituting the significance and value of research: Views from information technology academics and industry professionals. Studies in Higher Education, 29(2), 219-238.
  9. Chiang, K. H. (2003). Learning experiences of doctoral students in UK universities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(1/2), 4-32.
  10. Conrad, S., & Mauranen, A. (2003). The corpus of English as lingua franca in academic settings. Tesol Quarterly, 37(3), 513-527.
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage. Crystal, D. (1998). English as a global language. European Review-Chichester-, 6, 371-373.
  12. Declaration, B. (1999). The Bologna Declaration of 19 June 1999. Joint declaration of the European Ministers of Education. European Union, Brussels. www. bologna-berlin2003. de/pdf/bolog- na_declaration. pdf adresinden 02.02.2015 tarihinde edinilmiştir. Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2000). Doctoral students' access to research cultures-are some more unequal than others?. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-165.
  13. Diana, P., Maddaloni, D., Mel