SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship Between Cognitive Style and Visual Spatial Intelligence Of First Year Architectural Students

İlk Yıl Mimarlık Öğrencilerinin Bilişsel Stilleri İle Görsel Uzamsal Zekaları Arasındaki İlişki

Yasemin ERKAN YAZICI
Pages
805–820
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The students with local cognitive style were found to have more advanced spatial perception skills in comparison to the students with global cognitive style.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper investigates the relationship between the cognitive styles and visual spatial intelligence of freshman students of architecture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The assessment of the 2D and 3D perception skills of the students was based on their performance in answering a series of questions on 3D projections and perspective drawings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The students with local cognitive style were found to have more advanced spatial perception skills in comparison to the students with global cognitive style.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between the cognitive styles and visual spatial intelligence of freshman students of architecture. Cognitive styles of the students were determined using the "levels" dimension of the Thinking Styles Inventory. The assessment of the 2D and 3D perception skills of the students was based on their performance in answering a series of questions on 3D projections and perspective drawings. The performance of students at answering the questions was found to be significantly related to their cognitive styles. The students with local cognitive style were found to have more advanced spatial perception skills in comparison to the students with global cognitive style.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, ilk yıl mimarlık öğrencilerinin bilişsel stilleri ile görsel uzamsal zekâları arasındaki ilişki incelenmektedir. Öğrencilerin bilişsel stilleri, Düşünme Stilleri Envanteri'nin "seviyeler" boyutu kullanılarak tespit edilmiştir. Öğrencilerin 2 ve 3 boyutlu algı becerileri, 3 boyutlu objelerin izdüşüm ve perspektif çizimleri ile ilgili bir dizi soruyu yanıtlamada gösterdikleri performanslarına bağlı olarak belirlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin soruları yanıtlamadaki performansları ile bilişsel stilleri arasında önemli ölçüde bağlantı olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıntıcı bilişsel stile sahip öğrencilerin uzamsal algı becerilerinin bütüncü bilişsel stile sahip olanlara göre daha gelişmiş olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZICI, Y. E. (2022). The Relationship Between Cognitive Style and Visual Spatial Intelligence Of First Year Architectural Students. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 805–820. https://ajindex.com/articles/571800

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adanez, G.P., & Velasco, A.D. (2004). Training visualization ability by technical drawing. Journal for Geometry and Graphics, 8(1), 107-115.
  2. Alias, M., Black, T.R., & Gray, D.E. (2002). Effect of instructions on spatial visualisation ability in civil engineering students. International Education Journal, 3(1), 1-12.
  3. Buluş, M. (2005). The investigation of the thinking styles profile of students in the department of elementary education (In Turkish). Ege Journal of Education, 1, 1-24.
  4. Burnet, S. A., & Lane, D. M. (1980). Effects of academic instruction on spatial visualization. Intelligence, 4, 233-242.
  5. Cho, J.Y. (2012). Three areas of research on spatial ability in the architectural design domain. Journal of Architectural Engineering Technology, 1(2). Clark, A.C., & Scales, A. (2000). A study of current trends and issues related to technical/engineering design graphics. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 64(1), 24-34.
  6. Clements, D. H. (1999). Geometric and spatial thinking in young children. In J. V. Copley (Ed.), Mathematics in the early years (pp. 66-79).
  7. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Curry, L. (1983). An organization of learning style theory and constructs. L. Curry (Eds.), Learning Style in Continuing Education, Canada: Dalhousie University. Dai, D.Y., and Feldhusen, J.F. (1999). A validation study of the thinking styles inventory: Implications for gifted education. Roeper Review, 21(4), 302-307.
  8. Erkan Yazıcı, Y. (2013). Effects of spatial experiences & cognitive styles in the solution process of spacebased design problems in the first year of architectural design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(4), 1005-1015.
  9. Erkan Yazıcı, Y. (2010). Bilişsel farklılıkların ve mekansal deneyimlerin ilk yıl mimarlık öğrencilerinin tasarım süreçlerine etkilerinin araştırılması. (Investigation of the Effects of Cognitive Styles and Spatial Experiences on The Design Processes of First Year Architecture Students) PhD Thesis, Yıldız Teknik Universitesi, Mimarlık Anabilim Dalı, Bilgisayar Ortamında Tasarım Programı. İstanbul.
  10. Turkey. Fer, S. (2005). Validity and Reliability of the Thinking Styles Inventory. Educational Sciences: Theory&Practice, 5, 433-461.
  11. Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. (3rd Ed.), Basic Books. Lazear, D. (2000). The intelligent curriculum: Using MI to develop your student's full potential. New York: Zephyr Press.
  12. Ramful, A., and Lowrie, T. (2015). Sp