Journals / Kadın Doğum Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Rudimentary horn pregnancy: A case report

Rudimenter horn gebeliği: Olgu sunumu

Pages
836–837
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although f ultrasonography and computerized tomography can be used as diagnostic tools, the final diagnosis is made during a laparotomy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT Background: To share our experience and to discuss the difficulties in the diagnosis of rudimentary horn pregnancy Case: A 23-gestational-week pregnant woman had dilatation and curettage with the diagnosis of missed abortion in a private clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:During her ostetrical examination, a dead fetus of 15-gestationalweeks was identified in the left adnexia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although f ultrasonography and computerized tomography can be used as diagnostic tools, the final diagnosis is made during a laparotomy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: To share our experience and to discuss the difficulties in the diagnosis of rudimentary horn pregnancy Case: A 23-gestational-week pregnant woman had dilatation and curettage with the diagnosis of missed abortion in a private clinic. She was thereafter sent to our because of failure of the procedure. During her ostetrical examination, a dead fetus of 15-gestationalweeks was identified in the left adnexia. She went through explorative laparotomy with the prediagnosis of a rudimentary horn pregnancy. I Conclusion: Most of the cases of rudimentary horn pregnancies end up as missed abortion or as fetal demiss. Although f ultrasonography and computerized tomography can be used as diagnostic tools, the final diagnosis is made during a laparotomy.

Özet

Amaç: Yüzbinde bir oranında görülen rudimenter horn gebeli ile ilgili deney imimizi paylaşmak ve tanıdaki zorlukları tartışmak. Olgu: Yirmiüç yaşında, 23 haftalık gebeliği mevcut olan hastaya vajinal kanama nedeniyle başvurduğu özel bir klinikte missed abortus tanısıyla küretaj uygulanmış. Başarılı olunamayınca tarafımıza refere edilmiş.Yapılan muayene ve yardımcı tanı teknikleri sonucunda uterus sol tarafında yerleşmiş, uterin kavite ile ilişkisi gözlenmeyen 15 haftalık ölü fetüs saptandı. Rudimenter horn' gebeliği ön tanısı ile hasta operasyona al indi. Sonuç: Çoğu olguda rudimenter horn gebeliği 'missed abortus' ya da intrauterin fetal ölümle sonuçlanır. Tanıda ultrasonogram ve» kompüterize tomografi kullanılsa da kesin tanı cerrahi eksplorasyon sırasında konur.

🔖

Cite This Article

AĞAR, E., BAKSU, B., DAVAS, İ., AKYOL, A. (2022). Rudimentary horn pregnancy: A case report. Kadın Doğum Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 836–837. https://ajindex.com/articles/569015

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Chang.JC, Lin YC. Rupture of rudimentary horn pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1992;71:235-238. 2-O' Leary SL, 0' Leary JA. Rudimentary horn pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1963; 22:371 -4. 3-Zadi J, Carr J. Rupture of pregnant rudimentary uterine horn with fetal salvage. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73:3 59-60. 4-Muram N. Asymptomatic rupture of rudimentary horn. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69:486-7. 5-Kriplani A, Relan S, Mittal S, Buckshoe K. Pre-rupture diagnosis and management of rudimentary horn pregnancy in the tlrst trimester. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 58:203-5.