Journals / Kadın Doğum Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

Prenatal invasive procedures for diagnosis and treatment

Prenatal tanı ve tedavi amacıyla yapılan invaziv girişimler

Pages
946–956
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Increase in the age of the mother, malformations and markers diagnosed by ultrasonography, increased risks in biochemical screenings, increased multiple pregnancies due to assisted reproductive techniques and developments of fetal surgery and treatments are the main indications for invasive procedures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT Due to the developments in technology and change in the socioeconomic and cultural structure of the societes need for prenatal diagnosis and treatment is increased.
📊
Key Findings & Data:If it is done with a skilled and experienced physician with a correct indication complication rates are as low as acceptable.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Increase in the age of the mother, malformations and markers diagnosed by ultrasonography, increased risks in biochemical screenings, increased multiple pregnancies due to assisted reproductive techniques and developments of fetal surgery and treatments are the main indications for invasive procedures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

ABSTRACT Due to the developments in technology and change in the socioeconomic and cultural structure of the societes need for prenatal diagnosis and treatment is increased. The most important issues for the invasive procedures are correct indications, informed consent of the patient, and a skilled physician. If it is done with a skilled and experienced physician with a correct indication complication rates are as low as acceptable. Increase in the age of the mother, malformations and markers diagnosed by ultrasonography, increased risks in biochemical screenings, increased multiple pregnancies due to assisted reproductive techniques and developments of fetal surgery and treatments are the main indications for invasive procedures.

Özet

ÖZET Teknolojideki gelişmelere ve toplumlardaki sosyoekonomik ve kültürel değişimlere bağlı olarak prenatal tanı ve tedavi ihtiyacı artmıştır. Prenatal tedavide en önemli noktalar endikasyonun doğru konulması, hastanın bilgilendirilerek onanımın alınması ve işlemin tecrübeli bir elce yapılmasıdır. Bunlara dikkat edildiğinde komplikasyon oranlan kabul edilebilir düzeylere düşmüştür. İleri yaş gebeliklerindeki artış, ultrasonografık olarak saptanabilen fetal belirteçler ve sakatlıklar, biyokimyasal tarama testlerindeki risk artışları, yardımcı üreme tekniklerindeki gelişmelere bağlı artan çoğul gebelikler ve fetal tedavilerdeki gelişmeler invaziv girişimlerin günümüzdeki en önemli endikasyonlarıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARAÇOĞLU, F. (2022). Prenatal invasive procedures for diagnosis and treatment. Kadın Doğum Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 946–956. https://ajindex.com/articles/568993

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Önderoğlu LS. Fetal tnvaziv Girişimler. Fetal Tanı ve Tedavi. Editör Ferit Saraçoğlu, Güneş Yayınevi, Ankara, 1998, p.359-376. 2-Ralston SJ, Craigo SD. Ultrasound guided procedures for prenatal diagnosis and therapy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2004, 31:101-123 3-CEMAT Group Randomized Trial to assess safety and fetal outcome of early and midtrimester amniocentesis. Lancet 1998
  2. 7 4-The NICHD National Registry for Amniocentesis Study Group. Midtrimester amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis: safety and accuracy.JAMA 1976
  3. 6 5- Simpson NE, Dallaire L, Miller JR, Siminovich L, Hamerton JL, Miller J, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of genetic disease in Canada: report of a collaborative study. Can Med Assoc J 1976
  4. 48 6-Antsaklis A, Papantoniou N, Xygakis A, Mesogitis S, Tzortzis E, Michalas S. Genetic amniocentesis in women 2034 years old: associated risks. Prenat Diagn 2000
  5. 50 7-Yukobowich E, Anteby EY, Cohen SM, Lavy Y, Granat M, Yagel S. Risk of fetal loss in twin pregnancies undergoing second trimester amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol 2001
  6. 4 8-Oğur G. Genetik Hastalıklarda Prenatal Tanı. Fetal Tanı ve Tedavi. editor Ferit Saraçoğlu, Güneş Yayınevi, Ankara 1998, p 15-42 9-Lippman A, Tomkins DJ, Shime J, Hamerton JL. Canadian Collaborative CVS-Amniocentesis Clinical Trial Group: Canadian mullicenter randomized clinical trial of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: final report. Prenat Diagn 1992
  7. 408 10-Holzgreve W, Miny P, Schloo R. "Late CVS" international registry compilation of data from 24 centres. Prenat Diagn 1990
  8. 67 11-Daffos F, Capella-Pavlovsky M, Forestier F. A new procedure for fetal blood sampling in utero: preliminary results in fifty-three cases. Am JObstet Gynecol 1983
  9. 7 12-Ghidini A, Sepulveda W, Lockwood CJ, Romero R. Complications of fetal blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993
  10. Evans MI, Greb A, Kunkel LM, Sacks AJ, Johnson MP, Boehm C, et al. In utero fetal muscle biopsy for the diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991
  11. 32 14- Wapner RJ, Jenkins TM, Silverman N, Kaufmann M, Hannau C, McCue P. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital nephrosis by in utero kidney biopsy. Prenat Diagn 2001
  12. 61 15-Berghella V, Wapner RJ, Yang-Feng T, Mahoney MJ. Prenatal confirmation of true fetal trisomy 22 mosaicism by fetal skin biopsy following normal fetal blood sampling. PrenatDiagn 1998
  13. Hogge WA, Golbus MS. Surgical management