Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Two Cases of Bladder Adenocarcinoma After Augmentation Cystoplasty

İki Olguda Augmentasyon Sistoplasti Sonrası Mesanede Adenokarsinom

Pages
76–78
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As the malignancy risk after bladder augmentation is a proven fact, until the discovery of a proper diagnostic method, we recommend doing routine annual cystoscopic biopsy starting after the 10th year of ileocystoplasty

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To draw attention to the disregarded malignancy risk after ileocystoplasty, we present two cases of adenocarcinoma.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Despite chemotherapy, the condition progressed and the patient died at the 9th month.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As the malignancy risk after bladder augmentation is a proven fact, until the discovery of a proper diagnostic method, we recommend doing routine annual cystoscopic biopsy starting after the 10th year of ileocystoplasty
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

To draw attention to the disregarded malignancy risk after ileocystoplasty, we present two cases of adenocarcinoma. The first case was metastatic at initial diagnosis. Despite chemotherapy, the condition progressed and the patient died at the 9th month. The second patient has received cystectomy followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Although the second patient was an immunosuppressed renal transplant, she was disease-free at the 27th month. As the malignancy risk after bladder augmentation is a proven fact, until the discovery of a proper diagnostic method, we recommend doing routine annual cystoscopic biopsy starting after the 10th year of ileocystoplasty

Özet

Augmentasyon ileosistoplasti sonrası yeterince önemsenmeyen kanser riskine dikkat çekmek için, adenokarsinom tanısı almış iki olguyu sunuyoruz. İlk hasta tanı anında metastatik hastalığa sahipti. Kemoterapiye rağmen ilk olguda hastalık ilerlemiş ve hasta tanı sonrası 9. ayda kaybedilmiştir. İkinci hasta sistektomiyi takiben radyoterapi ve kemoterapi almıştır. İkinci hasta böbrek nakli sebebiyle immünitesi baskılanmış olmasına rağmen, tanı sonrası 27. ayda hastalıksız ve sağdır. Augmentasyon sonrası mesane kanseri gelişme riski kanıtlanmış bir gerçektir. Tanı için uygun bir yöntem keşfedilene kadar augmentasyon iliosistoplasti sonrası 10. yıldan sonra hastalara rutin yıllık sistoskopik biyopsilerin yapılmasını öneriyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ceyhan, E., Tekgül, S., Ergen, A., Akdoğan, B., Doğan, H. S., Bozacı, A. C., Baydar, D. E., Kösemehmetoğlu, K., Katipoğlu, K. (2022). Two Cases of Bladder Adenocarcinoma After Augmentation Cystoplasty. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 76–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/568726

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hamid R, Greenwell TJ, Nethercliffe JM, Freeman A, Venn SN, Woodhouse CR. Routine surveillance cystoscopy for patients with augmentation and substitution cystoplasty for benign urological conditions: is it necessary? BJU Int 2009;104:392-395
  2. Husmann DA, Rathbun SR. Long-term follow up of enteric bladder augmentations: the risk for malignancy. J Pediatr Urol 2008;4:381-385
  3. Husmann DA. Mortality following augmentation cystoplasty: A transitional urologist’s viewpoint. J Pediatr Urol 2017;13:358-364
  4. Shokeir AA, Shamaa M, El-Mekresh MM, El-Baz M, Ghoneim MA. Late malignancy in bowel segments exposed to urine without fecal stream. Urology 1995;46:657-661
  5. Golomb J, Klutke CG, Lewin KJ, Goodwin WE, deKernion JB, Raz S. Bladder neoplasms associated with augmentation cystoplasty: report of 2 cases and literature review. J Urol 1989;142:377-380
  6. Stone AR, Davies N, Stephenson TP. Carcinoma associated with augmentation cystoplasty. Br J Urol 1987;60:236-238
  7. Kimura H, Murakami K, Aoyama T, Koumoto I, Awane M, Kawai J, Hashimura T. Adenocarcinoma of an augmented bladder 49 years after enterocystoplasty: a case report. Hinyokika Kiyo 2015;61:167-171
  8. Ueda Y, Suzuki T, Jun Q, Higuchi Y, Maruyama T, Kondoh N, Nojima M, Yamamoto S, Yamamoto H, Kokura K, Shincho M, Hirota S, Shima H. An adenocarcinoma arising from the urinary bladder 37 years after bladder augmentation using the ileum. Hinyokika Kiyo 2009;55:145-148
  9. El Otmany A, Hamada H, al Bouzidi A, Oukheira H, Boujida M, Souadka A, Amrani M, Jahid A, Belabbas M. Squamous cell carcinoma in an augmentation of the ilial bladder for tuberculosis. Prog Urol 1999;9:534- 536
  10. Nakata W, Inoue H, Yoshida T, Tsuzihata M, Takahara S, Okuyama A. A rare case of transitional cell carcinoma of the ileum segment arising 43 years after ureteroileocystoplasty due to tuberculous bladder atrophy. Hinyokika Kiyo 2005;51:813-816
  11. Sato M, Fukui S, Fujita I, Kawakita M, Matsuda T, Sakaida N, Okamura M, Yamanaka K, Den S. Adenocarcinoma of the ileal segment with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder following ileocystoplasty: a case report. Hinyokika Kiyo 2000;46:33-36
  12. Takasaki E, Murahashi I, Toyoda M, Honda M, Waku S. Signet ring adenocarcinoma of ileal segment following ileocystoplasty. J Urol 1983;130:562-563
  13. Husmann DA. Malignancy after gastrointestinal augmentation in childhood. Ther Adv Urol 2009;1:5-11
  14. Moudouni S, Ennia I, Turlin B, Patard J, Guille F, Lobel B. Carcinomatous d