SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery or Shock Wave Lithotripsy?: Comparison of the Effects on Renal Functions by Glomerular Filtration Rate

Retrograd İntrarenal Cerrahi veya Şok Dalga Litotripsi?: Renal Fonksiyonlar Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Glomerüler Filtrasyon Hızı ile Karşılaştırılması

Turgay Ebiloğlu
Nejdet Karşıyakalı
Selahattin Bedir
Taner Özgürtaş
Selçuk Sarıkaya
Can Sicimli
Engin Kaya
Ömer Faruk Karataş
Pages
295–301
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Changes in GFR values after RIRS and SWL treatments were compared statistically.Results: When the early postoperative and late postoperative GFR levels were compared, a statistically significant difference was observed betweenthe groups (p=0.04 and p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and schok wave lithoripsy (SWL)interventions on renal functions by analyzing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) values.Materials and Methods: A total of 95 patients, who underwent RIRS or SWL in 2017 at Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, were included inthis retrospective study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Forty-six of these patients (48.4%) were in RIRS group and 49 (51.6%) were in SWL group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Changes in GFR values after RIRS and SWL treatments were compared statistically.Results: When the early postoperative and late postoperative GFR levels were compared, a statistically significant difference was observed betweenthe groups (p=0.04 and p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and schok wave lithoripsy (SWL)interventions on renal functions by analyzing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) values.Materials and Methods: A total of 95 patients, who underwent RIRS or SWL in 2017 at Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, were included inthis retrospective study. Forty-six of these patients (48.4%) were in RIRS group and 49 (51.6%) were in SWL group. Preoperative, early-postoperative(on the first postoperative day) and late-postoperative (on the first postoperative month) GFR values were calculated using the “abbreviatedModification of Diet in Renal Disease” Method. Changes in GFR values after RIRS and SWL treatments were compared statistically.Results: When the early postoperative and late postoperative GFR levels were compared, a statistically significant difference was observed betweenthe groups (p=0.04 and p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, retrograd intrarenal cerrahi (RIRS) ve şok dalgası litotripsi (SWL) işlemlerinin renal fonksiyonlar üzerindeki etkisini glomerüler filtrasyon hızı ölçümü (GFR) ile değerlendirmeyi ve karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: 2017 yılında Gülhane Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi’nde RIRS veya SWL işlemi uygulanan toplamda 95 hasta bu retrospektif çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların 46’sı (%48,4) RIRS, 49’u ise (%51,6) SWL grubundaydı. Operasyon öncesi, operasyon sonrası erken dönem (post-op 1. gün) ve geç dönem (post-op 1. ay) GFR değerleri “abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease” yöntemi ile hesaplandı. RIRS ve SWL tedavisi sonrasındaki GFR düzeyindeki değişimler istatistiksel olarak karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Erken post-operatif ve geç post-operatif GFR düzeyleri karşılaştırıldığında gruplar arasında istatistiksel anlamlı farklılığın olduğu izlendi (sırasıyla, p=0,04 ve p

🔖

Cite This Article

Ebiloğlu, T., Karşıyakalı, N., Bedir, S., Özgürtaş, T., Sarıkaya, S., Sicimli, C., Kaya, E., Karataş, Ö. F. (2022). Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery or Shock Wave Lithotripsy?: Comparison of the Effects on Renal Functions by Glomerular Filtration Rate. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 295–301. https://ajindex.com/articles/568708

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Donaldson JF, Lardas M, Scrimgeour D, Stewart F, MacLennan S, Lam TB, McClinton S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones. Eur Urol 2015;67:612-616
  2. Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;CD007044
  3. Portis AJ, Sundaram CP. Diagnosis and initial management of kidney stones. Am Fam Physician 2001;63:1329-1338
  4. Ercil H, Alma E, Bas O, Sener NC, Vuruskan E, Kuyucu F, Unal U, Goren MR, Evliyaoglu Y. Treatment of Moderate Sized Renal Pelvis Calculi: Stone Clearance Time Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. Urol J 2016;13:2490-2495
  5. Ergin G, Kirac M, Kopru B, Ebiloglu T, Kibar Y, Biri H. Shock wave lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery: which one is more effective for 10-20-mm renal stones in children. Ir J Med Sci 2018;187:1121-1126
  6. Gokce MI, Tokatli Z, Suer E, Hajiyev P, Akinci A, Esen B. Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treatment of stone disease in horseshoe kidney patients. Int Braz J Urol 2016;42:96-100
  7. Javanmard B, Kashi AH, Mazloomfard MM, Ansari Jafari A, Arefanian S. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Stones Smaller Than 2 cm: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Urol J 2016;13:2823- 2828
  8. Chaussy C, Brendel W, Schmiedt E. Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet 1980;2:1265-1268
  9. Zheng C, Yang H, Luo J, Xiong B, Wang H, Jiang Q. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment for renal stones 1-2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis 2015;43:549-556
  10. Wood K, Keys T, Mufarrij P, Assimos DG. Impact of stone removal on renal function: a review. Rev Urol 2011;13:73-89
  11. Evan AP, Willis LR. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: complications. In: Smith AD, et al., eds. Smith’s Textbook on Endourology. Hamilton: BC Decker, Inc., 2007, pp. 353-365
  12. Flamant M, Haymann JP, Vidal-Petiot E, Letavernier E, Clerici C, Boffa JJ, Vrtovsnik F. GFR estimation using the Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD study, and CKD-EPI equations in the elderly. Am J Kidney Dis 2012;60:847-849
  13. Levey