Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Laparoscopic Versus Open Transperitoneal Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Giant Hydronephrosis

Dev Hidronefroz Tedavisinde Açığa Karşı Laparoskopik Transperitoneal Nefrektomi

Pages
276–280
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It may be offered as a safe and acceptable model of treatment for patients presenting with giant hydronephrosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To assess the effectiveness of laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy in the treatment of patients with giant hydronephrosis and to compare the results with open nephrectomy.Materials and Methods: We reviewed the data of 19 patients underwent laparoscopic (laparoscopic group, n=8) and open (open group, n=11) transperitoneal nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis between January 2008 and 2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mann-Whitney U and Fisher’s Exact tests were used in the statistical analysis.Results: The mean operation time was 112.5±19.1 (90-140) minutes and 107.2±19.1 (80-140) minutes, respectively, for the laparoscopic and open groups (p=0.546).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It may be offered as a safe and acceptable model of treatment for patients presenting with giant hydronephrosis.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy in the treatment of patients with giant hydronephrosis and to compare the results with open nephrectomy.Materials and Methods: We reviewed the data of 19 patients underwent laparoscopic (laparoscopic group, n=8) and open (open group, n=11) transperitoneal nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis between January 2008 and 2018. Demographic characteristics, clinical, laboratory and radiological findings of cases were examined. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were reported. Mann-Whitney U and Fisher’s Exact tests were used in the statistical analysis.Results: The mean operation time was 112.5±19.1 (90-140) minutes and 107.2±19.1 (80-140) minutes, respectively, for the laparoscopic and open groups (p=0.546). The mean hospitalization period was 3.5 (3-7) and 6 (5-8) days, respectively, for the laparoscopic and open approach (p=0.003). No major complications during the perioperative period were observed in any of the patients. The mean follow-up periods were 36 (6-60) and 70 (39-80) months, respectively, for the laparoscopic and open groups (p=0.000).Conclusion: Laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy appears to be equally effective to the open approach with a shorter hospitalization period for the treatment of giant hydronephrosis. It may be offered as a safe and acceptable model of treatment for patients presenting with giant hydronephrosis.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada dev hidronefroz tespit edilen hastalarda transperitoneal laparoskopik nefrektominin etkinliğini değerlendirmeyi ve sonuçlarını açık nefrektomi yapılan hastalar ile karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2008 ve 2018 tarihleri arasında dev hidronefroz için laparoskopik (laparoskopik grup, n=8) ve açık (açık grup, n=11) transperitoneal nefrektomi yapılan 19 hastanın verilerini gözden geçirdik. Olguların demografik özellikleri, klinik, laboratuvar ve radyolojik bulguları incelenmiştir. Perioperatif ve postoperatif sonuçlar bildirildi. İstatistiksel analizde Mann-Whitney U ve Fisher’in Kesin testleri kullanıldı. Bulgular: Ortalama operasyon süresi sırasıyla laparoskopik ve açık gruplar için 112,5±19,1 (90-140) dk ve 107,2±19,1 (80-140) idi (p=0,546). Ortalama yatış süresi laparoskopik ve açık yaklaşım için sırasıyla 3,5 (3-7) ve 6 (5-8) gündü (p=0,003). Hiçbir hastada perioperatif majör komplikasyon izlenmedi. Laparoskopik ve açık gruplar için ortalama takip süreleri 36 (6-60) ve 70 (39-80) aydı (p=0,000). Sonuç: Laparoskopik transperitoneal nefrektomi, dev hidronefrozun tedavisi için daha kısa hastanede yatış süresi ile açık yaklaşım kadar etkili görünmektedir. Dev hidronefroz ile başvuran hastalar için güvenli ve kabul edilebilir bir tedavi modeli olarak verilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRDAĞ, Ç., ÇİTGEZ, S. (2022). Laparoscopic Versus Open Transperitoneal Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Giant Hydronephrosis. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 276–280. https://ajindex.com/articles/568651

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Hinman F Jr, Oppenheimer RO, Katz IL. Accelerated obstruction at the ureteropelvic junction in adults. J Urol 1983;129:812-815
  2. Wang QF, Zeng G, Zhong L, Li QL, Che XY, Jiang T, Zhang ZW, Zheng W, Tang QZ, Chen F, Wang KN. Giant hydronephrosis due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A rare case report, and a review of the literature. Mol Clin Oncol 2016;5:19-22
  3. Sokhal AK, Agrawal M, Saini DK, Singh K, Gupta AK, Sankhwar S, Pal Singh B. Giant hydronephrotic kidney masquerading as urinoma: A rare presentation with review of literature. Urol Case Rep 2017;13:69-71
  4. Hemal AK, Wadhwa SN, Kumar M, Gupta NP. Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis. J Urol 1999;162:35-39
  5. Chiang PH, Chen MT, Chou YH, Chiang CP, Huang CH, Chien CH. Giant hydronephrosis: report of 4 cases with review of the literature. J Formos Med Assoc 1990;89:811-817
  6. Ansari MS, Singh I, and Hemal AK. Giant hydronephrotic kidney mimicking intestinal obstruction. Int Urol Nephrol 2003;35:319-320
  7. Challacombe B, Sahai A, Murphy D, Dasgupta P. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis: when simple nephrectomy isn’t simple. J Endourol 2007;21:437-440
  8. Alharbi B. Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for giant hydronephrotic non-functioning kidney. Urol Case Rep 2018;21:110-112
  9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213
  10. Tazi MF, Riyach O, Ahallal Y, Mellas S, Khallouk A, El Fassi MJ, Farih MH. Giant Urinary Bladder and Bilateral Giant Hydronephrosis due to Bladder Neck Obstruction: One Case Report and Literature Review. Case Rep Urol 2012;2012:817519
  11. Fukasawa M, Kobayashi H, Matsushita K, Araki I, Takeda M. Intraperitoneal rupture of giant hydronephrosis due to ureteral cancer accompanied by renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2002;167:1393-1394.