Journals / Perinatal journal (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies according to delivery types: vaginal delivery or Cesarean delivery?

Pages
144–151
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The newborn intensive care unit (NICU) admission rates of 1st fetus and 2nd fetus in the groups of 37 weeks were higher in those born by CS at a statistically significant level when compared to those born by VD (1st fetus p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Our aim was to compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies, which result in vaginal delivery (VD) and Cesarean section (CS), and the factors affecting the decision of CS.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Twin pregnancies between 30 and 39 weeks who gave birth in a tertiary center were included in the present study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The newborn intensive care unit (NICU) admission rates of 1st fetus and 2nd fetus in the groups of 37 weeks were higher in those born by CS at a statistically significant level when compared to those born by VD (1st fetus p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Our aim was to compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies, which result in vaginal delivery (VD) and Cesarean section (CS), and the factors affecting the decision of CS. Methods: Twin pregnancies between 30 and 39 weeks who gave birth in a tertiary center were included in the present study. The demographic data and maternal and neonatal outcomes of the patient groups who gave birth 37 weeks were recorded and compared according to the type of birth. Results: A total of 1209 patients were included in the study. The 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores of the 1st and 2nd fetuses in twin pregnancies 37 weeks of age were higher in the VD group at a statistically significant level (p=0.039 and p=0.032, respectively). The newborn intensive care unit (NICU) admission rates of 1st fetus and 2nd fetus in the groups of 37 weeks were higher in those born by CS at a statistically significant level when compared to those born by VD (1st fetus p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, B. A., TURAN, G., TURGUT, E., DEMİRDAĞ, E., AYDIN, Z., TAGHİYEVA, T. (2022). Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies according to delivery types: vaginal delivery or Cesarean delivery?. Perinatal journal (Online), Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 144–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/588286

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Schmitz T, Prunet C, Azria E, BohecC, Bongain C, Chabanier P, et al. Association between planned cesarean delivery and neonatal mortality and morbidity in twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2017
  2. 986–95. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 2. Practice bulletin No. 169 Summary: multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2016
  3. 926–28. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 3. Smith GCS, Fleming KM, White IR. Birth order of twins and risk of perinatal death related to delivery in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales, 1994–2003: Retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2007
  4. 576–78. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 4. Roberts CL, Algert CS, Nippita TA, Bowen JR, Shand AW. Association of prelabor cesarean delivery with reduced mortality in twins born near term. Obstet Gynecol 2015
  5. 103–10. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 5. Schmitz T, Carnavalet C de C, Azria E, Lopez E, Cabrol D, Goffinet F. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2008
  6. 695– 703. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 6. Barrett JFR, Hannah ME, Hutton EK, Willan AR, Allen AC, Armson BA, et al.
  7. Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2013
  8. 1295–1305. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 7. Goossens SM, Ensing S, van der Hoeven MAHBM, Roumen FJME, Nijhuis JG, Mol BW. Comparison of planned caesarean delivery and planned vaginal delivery in women with a twin pregnancy: a nation wide cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018
  9. 97–104. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 8. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College)
  10. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  11. Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2014
  12. 381–3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 9. Zafman KB, Naqvi M, Melka S, Miller J, Rebarber A, Fox NS. The association between ›ntended mode of delivery and maternal morbidity in twin pregnancies. Am J Perinatol 2019
  13. 695–700. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 10. Hofmeyr GJ, Barrett JF, Crowther CA. Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015
  14. 2015(12):CD006553. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 11. Joseph KS, Allen AC, Dodds L, Vincer MJ, Armson BA. Causes and consequences of recent ›ncreases in preterm birth among twins. Obstet Gynecol 2001
  15. 57–64. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 12. Fox NS, Cohen N, Odom E, Gupta S, Lam-Rachlin JL, Satzman DH, et al. Long-term outcomes of twins based on the intended mode of