Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2

TRADITIONAL TRAINING VERSUS VIRTUAL REALITY AND HAPTIC ENABLED SIMULATION TRAINING FOR POSTERIOR CERVICAL SCREW PLACEMENT

Pages
78–82
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: According to the results acquired from this study, we observed a lower cervical spine screw misplacement ratio in those who trained with VR based haptic enabled simulation before performing cervical posterior instrumentation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Simulation-based training is a technique, which evokes or replicates substantial aspects of the real world in a fully interactive fashion and replaces and amplifies real experiences with guided ones, which are generally immersive.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Twenty-five junior surgeons (20 orthopedic, 5 neurosurgeon) who were not involved in previous posterior cervical spine instrumentation participated in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: According to the results acquired from this study, we observed a lower cervical spine screw misplacement ratio in those who trained with VR based haptic enabled simulation before performing cervical posterior instrumentation.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Simulation-based training is a technique, which evokes or replicates substantial aspects of the real world in a fully interactive fashion and replaces and amplifies real experiences with guided ones, which are generally immersive. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five junior surgeons (20 orthopedic, 5 neurosurgeon) who were not involved in previous posterior cervical spine instrumentation participated in this study. Before the procedures, all surgeons received 2-hour lecture about cervical spine anatomy and screw insertion techniques. Group 1 (10 surgeons) underwent virtual reality simulation with haptic feedback for 20 min, group 2 (15 surgeons) were attended video sessions with experienced surgeons for 20 min for posterior cervical instrumentation training. After, all junior surgeons applied C1-2 screw, C3-4-5 lateral mass screws, and C6-7 cervical pedicle screws to saw bones. All saw bones underwent computerized tomography (CT) imaging and a blinded radiologist reviewed the CT images. Results: Group 1 applied 70 screws and group 2 applied 105 screws. Group 1 showed a 12% misplacement ratio, while group 2 showed a 19% misplacement ratio and 4% rate of a possible vertebral artery trace penetration (p=0.026). Conclusion: According to the results acquired from this study, we observed a lower cervical spine screw misplacement ratio in those who trained with VR based haptic enabled simulation before performing cervical posterior instrumentation.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAMURCU, Y., KARA, G. K., ERDOĞAN, C., YALNIZ, E., TURAN, K., AYDINLI, U., ÖZTÜRK, Ç., ERTURER, R. E. (2022). TRADITIONAL TRAINING VERSUS VIRTUAL REALITY AND HAPTIC ENABLED SIMULATION TRAINING FOR POSTERIOR CERVICAL SCREW PLACEMENT. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 78–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/568553

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aïm F, Lonjon G, Hannouche D, Nizard R. Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Training in Orthopaedic Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:224-32
  2. Lohre R, Wang JC, Lewandrowski KU, Goel DP. Virtual reality in spinal endoscopy: a paradigm shift in education to support spine surgeons. J Spine Surg. 2020;6(Suppl 1):S208-23
  3. Lohre R, Warner JJP, Athwal GS, Goel DP. The evolution of virtual reality in shoulder and elbow surgery. JSES Int. 2020;4:215-23
  4. Kalun P, Wagner N, Yan J, Nousiainen MT, Sonnadara RR. Surgical simulation training in orthopedics: current insights. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:125-31
  5. Lohre R, Bois AJ, Athwal GS, Goel DP; Canadian Shoulder and Elbow Society (CSES). Improved Complex Skill Acquisition by Immersive Virtual Reality Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102:e26
  6. Bernardo A. Virtual Reality and Simulation in Neurosurgical Training. World Neurosurg. 2017;106:1015-29
  7. Konakondla S, Fong R, Schirmer CM. Simulation training in neurosurgery: advances in education and practice. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:465-73
  8. Oliveira LM, Figueiredo EG. Simulation Training Methods in Neurological Surgery. Asian J Neurosurg. 2019;14:364-70
  9. Pfandler M, Lazarovici M, Stefan P, Wucherer P, Weigl M. Virtual reality-based simulators for spine surgery: a systematic review. Spine J. 2017;17:1352-63
  10. Vaughan N, Dubey VN, Wainwright TW, Middleton RG. A review of virtual reality based training simulators for orthopaedic surgery. Med Eng Phys. 2016;38:59-71
  11. Harms J, Melcher RP. Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:2467-71
  12. Jeanneret B, Magerl F, Ward EH, Ward JC. Posterior stabilization of the cervical spine with hook plates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16(3 Suppl):S56-63
  13. Abumi K, Itoh H, Taneichi H, Kaneda K. Transpedicular screw fixation for traumatic lesions of the middle and lower cervical spine: description of the techniques and preliminary report. J Spinal Disord. 1994;7:19-28
  14. Hojo Y, Ito M, Suda K, Oda I, Yoshimoto H, Abumi K. A multicenter study on accuracy and complications of freehand placement of cervical pedicle screws under lateral fluoroscopy in different pathological conditions: CT-based evaluation of more than 1,000 screws. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:2166-74
  15. Eldin MM, Hassan ASA. Free hand technique of cervical lateral mass screw fixation. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2017;8:113-8.