Journals / Journal of Positive School Psychology (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Meaningful Work Protects Teachers’ Self-Rated Health under Stressors

Pages
140–152
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed that meaningful work was associated with better self-rated health and the stressors were associated with poorer self-rated health.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A sense of meaningfulness is one of the most sought?after work characteristics which has been associated with employees’ well-being.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study explored whether meaningful work enhances self-rated health in challenging work context, under the stressors of distractions, unnecessary tasks, and unreasonable tasks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed that meaningful work was associated with better self-rated health and the stressors were associated with poorer self-rated health.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A sense of meaningfulness is one of the most sought?after work characteristics which has been associated with employees’ well-being. This study explored whether meaningful work enhances self-rated health in challenging work context, under the stressors of distractions, unnecessary tasks, and unreasonable tasks. Data was collected from Finnish teachers (N = 1,658) and structural equation modelling was employed with the latent interaction terms. Results showed that meaningful work was associated with better self-rated health and the stressors were associated with poorer self-rated health. Protective potential of meaningful work against stressors was also discovered, as meaningful work mitigated the harm of stressors on self-rated health. These findings indicate that meaningful work acts as an important resource for employees’ self-rated health and helps them to better cope with stressful work conditions, enhancing well-being. The protective quality of meaningful work means that even challenging work context may have less harm for employees’ well-being, if they have a strong sense of meaning in work. The practical implications of the findings for teachers and organizations are discussed.

🔖

Cite This Article

MINKKINEN, J., AUVINEN, E., MAUNO, S. (2022). Meaningful Work Protects Teachers’ Self-Rated Health under Stressors. Journal of Positive School Psychology (Online), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 140–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/565795

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ainsworth, S., & Oldfield, J. (2019). Quantifying teacher resilience: Context matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 117–128.
  2. Aldrup, K., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., Göllner, R., & Trauwein, U. (2018). Student misbehavior and teacher well-being: Testing the mediating role of the teacher-student relationship. Learning and Instruction, 58, 126–136.
  3. Allan, B. A., Batz-Barbarich, C., Sterling, H. M., & Tay, L. (2019). Outcomes of meaningful work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 500–528.
  4. Aloe, A. M., Shisler, S. M., Norris, B. D., Nickerson, A. B., & Rinker, T. W. (2014). A multivariate meta-analysis of student misbehavior and teacher burnout. Educational Research Review, 12, 30–44.
  5. Arnold, K. A., Turner, N., Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K., & McKee, M. C. (2007). Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: The mediating role of meaningful work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 193–203.
  6. Arnold, K. A., & Walsh, M. M. (2015). Customer incivility and employee well-being: Testing the moderating effects of meaning, perspective taking and transformational leadership. Work and Stress, 29, 362–378.
  7. Bailey, C., Yeoman, R., Madden, A., Thompson, M., & Kerridge, G. (2018). A review of the empirical literature on meaningful work: Progress and research agenda. Human Resource Development Review, 18(1), 83–113.
  8. Bailis, D. S., Segall, A., & Chipperfield, J. G. (2003). Two views of self-rated general health status. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 203–217.
  9. Bombak, A. E. (2013). Self-rated health and public health: A critical perspective. Frontiers in Public Health, 1, 15. Boyle, G. J., Borg, M. G., Falzon, J. M., & Baglioni, A. J. Jr. (1995). A structural model of the dimensions of teacher stress. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 49–67. Brulé, G., & Morgan, R. (2018). Working with stress: Can we turn distress into eustress? Journal of Neuropsychology & Stress Management, 3, 1–3.
  10. Clauss, E., Hoppe, A., Schachler, V., & O’Shea, D. (2020). Occupational self-efficacy and work engagement as moderators in the stressordetachment model. Work & Stress. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2020.1743790
  11. Conley, S., & You, S. (2009). Teacher role stress, satisfaction, commitment, and intentions to leave: A structural model. Psychological Reports, 105(3), 771–786.
  12. De Simone, S., Cicotto, G., & Lampis, J. (2016). Occupational stress, job satisfaction and physical health in teachers. Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée, 6