Journals / Journal of Positive School Psychology (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Student subjective wellbeing, school functioning, and psychological adjustment in high school adolescents: A latent variable analysis

Pages
153–164
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Taken together, these results suggest that student subjective wellbeing is an essential resource for improving youth academic functioning and psychological health.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Well-being is a multi-faceted construct that encompasses all aspects of healthy and successful human functioning across multiple domains.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants included 223 adolescents, comprising of 54.9% girls, ranging in age from 13 to 18 years (M= 15.67, SD= 1.21).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Taken together, these results suggest that student subjective wellbeing is an essential resource for improving youth academic functioning and psychological health.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Well-being is a multi-faceted construct that encompasses all aspects of healthy and successful human functioning across multiple domains. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the predictive power of student subjective wellbeing on several specific adolescent school and psychological adjustment indicators: school achievement, academic satisfaction, prosocial behavior, and internalizing and externalizing problems. Participants included 223 adolescents, comprising of 54.9% girls, ranging in age from 13 to 18 years (M= 15.67, SD= 1.21). Findings from the LVPA indicated that student subjective wellbeing was significantly associated with youth school functioning and adjustment outcomes, ranging from small-to-large effect size (R2 range = .05 to .42). Student subjective wellbeing had the strongest predictive effect on prosocial behavior, followed by academic satisfaction, psychological health problems, and school achievement. With regard to the first-order models, school connectedness and joy of learning significantly predicted student academic satisfaction, prosocial behavior, and psychological adjustment problems. However, the predictive effect of these variables on student school achievement was non–significant. Educational purpose and academic efficacy were significant predictors of all adolescent outcomes. Taken together, these results suggest that student subjective wellbeing is an essential resource for improving youth academic functioning and psychological health.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, G., COŞKUN, M. (2022). Student subjective wellbeing, school functioning, and psychological adjustment in high school adolescents: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Positive School Psychology (Online), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 153–164. https://ajindex.com/articles/565794

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Alivernini, F., & Lucidi, F. (2011). Relationship between social context, self-efficacy, motivation, academic achievement, and intention to drop out of high school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Research. 104(4), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671003728062
  2. Antaramian, S. P., Scott Huebner, E., Hills, K. J., & Valois, R. F. (2010). A dual-factor model of mental health: Toward a more comprehensive understanding of youth functioning. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 80(4), 462-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01049.x
  3. Arslan, G. (2016). Relationship between sense of rejection, academic achievement, academic efficacy, and educational purpose in high school students. Egitim ve Bilim, 41(183), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.5562
  4. Arslan, G. (2018). Understanding the associations between positive psychological functioning at work and cognitive wellbeing in teachers. Journal of Positive School Psychology. 2(2), 113-127. https://www.journalppw.com/index.php/JPPW/art icle/view/22 Arslan, G. (2019a). Exploring the effects of positive psychological strengths on psychological adjustment in adolescents. Child Indicators Research, 12(4), 1449–1464. https://doi.org/10.1 007/s12187-018-9589-5
  5. Arslan, G. (2019b). Positive psychological traits, school functioning, and psychological adjustment in elementary schoolchildren. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 29(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2018.24
  6. Arslan, G. (2019c). Development and validation of the Youth Externalizing Behavior Screener: A brief and effective measure of behavioral problems. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 7(sup1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.10 80/21683603.2018.1466747 Arslan, G. (2020). Measuring emotional problems in Turkish adolescents: Development and initial validation of the Youth Internalizing Behavior Screener. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2019.1700860
  7. Arslan, G., & Duru, E. (2017). Initial development and validation of the School Belongingness Scale. Child Indicators Research, 10(4), 1043–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9414-y
  8. Arslan, G., & Renshaw, T. L. (2018). Student subjective wellbeing as a predictor of adolescent problem behaviors: a comparison of first-order and second-order factor effects. Child Indicators Research, 11(2), 507–521. https://doi.org/10.1007 /s12187-017-9444-0
  9. Arslan, G., & Tanhan, A. (2019). Ergenler