SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish) / 2011 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

Lomber Disk Cerrahisinde Spinal ve Genel Anestezi Uygulamasının Karşılaştırılması

Comparison of Spinal and General Anesthesia in Lumbar Disc Surgery

Hakan KARABAGLI
Inci KARA
Bahar OC
Seza APILLIOĞULLARI
Jale Bengu CELIK
Pages
487–496
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Patients were matched for demographic data, perioperativephysiological changes, pain score, amount of blood loss, surgeon satisfaction, perioperativecomplications and length of stay in hospital.Results: Intraoperatively and postoperatively, the incidence of tachycardia and hypertensionwere more frequent with GA (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative advantage and disadvantagebetween general (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA).Material and Methods: Sixty patients (randomize GA,n=30, SA,n=30) undergoing lumbardisc surgery were enrolled.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative advantage and disadvantagebetween general (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA).Material and Methods: Sixty patients (randomize GA,n=30, SA,n=30) undergoing lumbardisc surgery were enrolled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patients were matched for demographic data, perioperativephysiological changes, pain score, amount of blood loss, surgeon satisfaction, perioperativecomplications and length of stay in hospital.Results: Intraoperatively and postoperatively, the incidence of tachycardia and hypertensionwere more frequent with GA (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative advantage and disadvantagebetween general (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA).Material and Methods: Sixty patients (randomize GA,n=30, SA,n=30) undergoing lumbardisc surgery were enrolled. Patients were matched for demographic data, perioperativephysiological changes, pain score, amount of blood loss, surgeon satisfaction, perioperativecomplications and length of stay in hospital.Results: Intraoperatively and postoperatively, the incidence of tachycardia and hypertensionwere more frequent with GA (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı genel (GA) ve spinal (SA) anestezinin perioperatif avantaj vedezavantajlarını karşılaştırmaktır.Yöntem ve Gereç: Lomber disk operasyonu geçirecek rasgele 60 hasta (GA,n=30, SA,n=30)seçildi. Hastalar demografik veriler, peroperatif vital bulgular, ağrı skorları, kan kaybımiktarı, cerrah memnuniyeti, perioperatif komplikasyonlar ve hasatanede kalış süresiyönünden karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: İntraoperatif ve postoperatif dönemde hipertansiyon ve taşikardi GA grubundadaha sıktı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KARABAGLI, H., KARA, I., OC, B., APILLIOĞULLARI, S., CELIK, J. B. (2022). Lomber Disk Cerrahisinde Spinal ve Genel Anestezi Uygulamasının Karşılaştırılması. Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish), Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 487–496. https://ajindex.com/articles/565361

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Backof en JE, Schauble JR. Hemodynamic changes with prone positioning during general anaesthesia. Anesth Analg 1985
  2. 194 2. Covino BG. Rationale f or spinal anesthesia. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1989
  3. 12 3. Davis FM, Laurenson VG, Lewis J, Wells JE, Gillespie WJ. Metabolic response to total hip arthroplasty under hypobaric subarachnoid or general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1987
  4. 729 4. Demirel CB, Kalaycı M, Ozkocak I, Altunkaya H, Ozer Y, Acikgoz B. A prospective randomized study comparing perioperative outcome variables af ter epidural or general anesthesia f or lumbar disc surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2003
  5. 192 5. Hassi N, Badaoui R, Cagny-Bellet A, Sif eddine S, Ossart M. Spinal anesthesia f or disk herniation and lumbar laminectomy. Apropos of 77 cases. Can Anesthesiol 1995
  6. 25 6. Jellish WS, Thalj i Z, Stevenson K, Shea J. A prospective randomized study, comparing short- and intermediate-term perioperative outcome variables af ter spinal or general anesthesia f or lumbar disk and laminectomy surg. Anesth Analg 1996
  7. 564 7. Kehlet H. The stress response the anesthesia and surgery: release mechanism and modifying f actor. Clin Anesth 1984
  8. 339 8. Mahan KT, Wang J. Spinal morphine anesthesia and urinary retention. J Am Pediatr Med Assoc 1993
  9. 614 9. McLain RF, Bell GR, Kalf as I, Tetzlaff JE, Yoon HJ. Complications associated with lumbar laminectomy. Spine 2004
  10. 2547 10. McLain RF, Kalf as I, Bell GR, Tetzlaff JE, Yoon HJ, Rana M. Comparison of spinal and general anesthesia in lumbar laminectomy surgery: a case- controlled analysis of 400 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2005
  11. 22 11. Pf lug AE, Aasheim GM, Foster C. Sequence of return of neurological f unction and criteria f or saf e ambulation f ollowing subarachnoid block. Can Anaesth Soc J 1978
  12. 139 12. Riding JE. Minor complications of general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1975
  13. 101 13. Sadrolsadat SH, Mahdavi AR, Moharari RS, Khaj avi MR, Khashayar P, Naj af i A, Amirj amshidi A. A prospective randomized trial comparing the technique of spinal and general anesthesia f or lumbar disk surgery: a study of 100 cases. Surg Neurol 2009
  14. 65 14. Scott NB, Kehlet H. regional anesthesia and surgical morbidity. Br J Surg 1988
  15. 304 15. Silver DJ, Dunsmore RH, Dickson CM. Spinal anesthesia f or lumbar disc surgery: review of 576 operations. Anesth Analg 1976
  16. 554 16. Watcha MF, White PF. Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Its etiology, trea