Journals / Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish) / 2012 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Kraniyotomi Sonrası Erken Ağrıda Cinsiyet Farkı

Gender Difference in Early Pain After Craniotomy

Pages
248–257
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In women at 0. min and 1. hours VAS- VRS scores were higher than inmen's VAS- VRS scores (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective (Background): The aim of this study was to determine the aetiology, quality andquantity of the pain following craniotomy during early postoperative period with using visualanalogue score (VAS) and verbal rating scale (VRS).Methods: All craniotomy patients received 5 mg kg-1 Thiopental, 2 mcg kg-1 Fentanyl, 0,6mg kg-1 rocuronium for induction of anesthesia, and 0,1- 2 mg kg hrs -1 propofol, 0,15-1,00mcg.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Kg-1 min-1 remifentanyl infusions with 50% oxygen-air mixture and additional doses ofrocuronium (0,15 mg kg-1) for maintenance of anesthesia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In women at 0. min and 1. hours VAS- VRS scores were higher than inmen's VAS- VRS scores (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective (Background): The aim of this study was to determine the aetiology, quality andquantity of the pain following craniotomy during early postoperative period with using visualanalogue score (VAS) and verbal rating scale (VRS).Methods: All craniotomy patients received 5 mg kg-1 Thiopental, 2 mcg kg-1 Fentanyl, 0,6mg kg-1 rocuronium for induction of anesthesia, and 0,1- 2 mg kg hrs -1 propofol, 0,15-1,00mcg. Kg-1 min-1 remifentanyl infusions with 50% oxygen-air mixture and additional doses ofrocuronium (0,15 mg kg-1) for maintenance of anesthesia. Before craniotomy, scalp aroundincisional area was infiltrated with 20 ml local anesthetic (1% lidocaine with 35 mcg. mL-1 adrenaline). All patients' age, weight, height, gender and location of surgical incision(supratentorial or infratentorial), the cause (vascular or tumor) and the duration of the surgerywas recorded. All patients' heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, Ramsay sedationstatus scale was assessed and reported at 0., 30th. and 60th. minutes after operation and duringdischarge time from post anesthesia care unit (PACU). Patients who were unconscious beforeor after surgery, with limited cooperation and impaired cognitive functions were excludedfrom the study.Results: In the early post-operative period, following craniotomy, the pain was mild tomoderate according to VRS, and the pain was disturbing according to VAS scores of thepatients. The average scores were 3.91± 2, 45 for VAS and 1.40 ± 1,08 for VRS at 0. minuteof postoperative period. There was statistically significant decrease in VAS and VRS scores at30. and 60. minutes. In women at 0. min and 1. hours VAS- VRS scores were higher than inmen's VAS- VRS scores (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı postoperatif erken dönemdeki postoperatif ağrının etiyolojisini,niceliğini ve niteliğini vizüel analog skala (VAS) ve verbal rating skala (VRS)kullanarakbelirlemektir. Metod: Tüm kraniyotomi hastalarına total intravenöz anestezi uygulandı. Tüm hastaların yaş,kilo, boy, cinsiyet ve insizyonal bölgeleri (supratentoriyal veya infratentoriyal), operasyonnedeni (vasküler veya tümör) ve operasyon süreleri kaydedildi. Tüm hastaların kalp hızı,sistolik ve diyastolik kan basınçları, Ramsay sedasyon skorları değerlendirildi ve cerrahidensonraki 0., 30. ve 60. dakikalarda PACU unitesinden taburcu olana dek kaydedildi. Cerrahiöncesinde veya sonrasında bilinci kapalı olanlar, sınırlı kooperasyonu veya kognitifdisfonksiyonu olanlar çalışma dışı bırakıldı.Bulgular: Erken postoperatif dönemde, kraniyotomi sonrasında VRS' ye göre ağrı hafif- ortadüzeyde, VAS skorlarına göre rahatsız edici düzeyde idi. Ortalama VAS skorları postoperatif0. dakikada 3.,91± 2, 45 ve VRS skorları .1,40 ± 1,08 idi. VAS ve VRS skorlarında 30. ve 60.dakikalarda anlamlı azalma meydana geldi.Sonuç: Kraniyotomi sonrası hafif- orta düzeyde ağrı geliştiğini saptadık. VAS ve VRSskorları ile supratentoriyal veya infratentoriyal cerrahi yaklaşımların,farklı cerrahi insizyontarzlarının, vasküler veya tümöral patoloji olmasının, hastanın ASA durumunun, vücut kitleindeksinin, yaş ve operasyon süresinin anlamlı bir ilişkisi saptanmadı. Yalnızca hastanıncinsiyeti ile postoperatif ağrı arasında anlamlı bir korelasyon vardı.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKMEN, N., CEYLAN, A., KARAMAN, S., UYAR, M., ANADOLU, Ö., DERBENT, A. (2022). Kraniyotomi Sonrası Erken Ağrıda Cinsiyet Farkı. Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish), Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 248–257. https://ajindex.com/articles/565227

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Botoz H, Verdonck O, Pellerin C, et al. The analgesic p rop erties of scalp inf iltrations with rop ivacaine af ter intracranial tumoural resection. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 240- 244
  2. De Benedittis G, Lorenzetti A, Miglione M, et al. Postop erative p ain in neurosurgery: a p ilot study in brain surgery. Neurosurgery 1996; 38: 466–470
  3. De Benedittis G, Lorenzetti A, Migliore M, Sp agnoli D, Tiberio F, Eff ect of Scalp inf iltration on Postop erative Pain Relief in Elective Sup ratentorial Craniotomy with 0.5% Bup ivacaine with Adrenaline 1:400,000. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008; 91:. 10 1523- 5
  4. Dunbar PJ, Visco E, Lam A. Craniotomy are associated less analgesic requirements than other surgical p rocedures. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 335- 340
  5. Fabling JM, Gan TJ, Guy J, Borel CO, el-Moalem HE, Warner DS. Postop erative nausea and vomiting. A retrosp ective analysis in p atients undergoing elective craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1997; 9: 308–312
  6. Flexman AN, Ng LJ, Gelb A. Acute and chronic p ain f ollowing craniotomy. Curr Op in Anesthesiol. 2010; 23: 551- 557
  7. Graham AC, Reid MM, Andrews PJD. Percep tion of p ain exp erienced and adequacy of analgesia f ollowing elective craniotomy. Anaesthesia, 54: 814- 15, 1999
  8. Harkins SW, Chap man CR: Detection and decision f actors in p ain p ercep tion in young and elderly men. Pain 2:253-264, 1976
  9. Iref in SA, Schubert A, Bloomf ield EL, et al. The eff ect of craniotomy location on p ostop erative p ain and nausea. J Anesth. 17: 227-31, 2003 10. Jeff rey HM, Charlton P, Mellor DJ, et al. Analgesia af ter intracranial surgery: a double-blind, p rosp ective comp arison of codeine and tramadol. Br ] Anaesth. 83: 245-249, 1999
  10. Keogh E, Herdenf eldt M. Gender, cop ing and the p ercep tion of p ain. Pain 2002;97:195–201
  11. Kest B, Sarton E, Dahan A. Gender diff erences in op ioid mediated analgesia. Animal and human studies. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 539–47
  12. Lawan Tuchinda, Bup ivacaine scalp nerve block: hemodynamic resp onse during craniotomy, intraop erative and p ostop erative analgesia Asian Biomedicine. 2010; 4; 243-251
  13. Nguyen A, Girard F, Boudreault D, Fugere F, Ruel M, Moumdj ian R, et al. Scalp nerve blocks decrease the severity of p ain af ter craniotomy. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 1272-6
  14. Quiney N, Coop er R, Stoneham M, Walters F. Pain af ter craniotomy. A time f or reapp raisal? Br J Neurosurg 1996; 10: 295-9
  15. Resche L. Sex, gender, and clinical p ain. Proceedings of t