Journals / Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish) / 2013 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

Servikal Spinal Kord Yaralanmasında Travmanın Radyolojik Kanıtı Olmaksızın Sınıflandırma ve Cerrahi Karar Verme

Classification and Surgical Decision Making in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury without Radiologic Evidence of Trauma

Pages
660–673
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) scale wasused to evaluate the neurologic status of the patients and neurologic evaluation was performedbefore and after surgery according to the criteria proposed by the Japanese OrthopedicAssociation (JOA).Results: The review indicated that there were chiefly 3 groups of preexisting factors asfollows: (1) Type I(20%): disc herniation or segmental instability. (2) Type II(52%):obviousdecrease or even disappearance of the storing space of spinal canal, including congenitalspinal canal stenosis, multi-segmental cervical spondylosis, ossification of the posteriorlongitudinal ligament (OPLL) (3) Type III(28%): decrease of the storing space of spinal canalcombined with segmental instability or disc herniation .The postoperative follow-ups for thesurgical treatment showed that neurologic status had been improved significantly in more than80% of the patients with SCIWORET and the mean recovery rate with the JOA score was57.9% in Type I, 51.5% in Type II and 48.2% in Type III.Conclusions: Classification for SCIWORET according to preexisting factors may be used asa basic guidance for surgical decision-making and good outcomes can be achieved.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate retrospectively the preexisting factors, classification andcorresponding surgical treatments for spinal cord injury without radiologic evidence of trauma(SCIWORET).Methods: Seventy-five patients with SCIWORET were reviewed to analyze theirdemographic information, mechanisms of injury, neurologic status, imaging manifestation,and surgical management along with outcome.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Classification for SCIWORET was proposedand unique aspects of this classification system along with surgical management and outcomewas discussed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) scale wasused to evaluate the neurologic status of the patients and neurologic evaluation was performedbefore and after surgery according to the criteria proposed by the Japanese OrthopedicAssociation (JOA).Results: The review indicated that there were chiefly 3 groups of preexisting factors asfollows: (1) Type I(20%): disc herniation or segmental instability. (2) Type II(52%):obviousdecrease or even disappearance of the storing space of spinal canal, including congenitalspinal canal stenosis, multi-segmental cervical spondylosis, ossification of the posteriorlongitudinal ligament (OPLL) (3) Type III(28%): decrease of the storing space of spinal canalcombined with segmental instability or disc herniation .The postoperative follow-ups for thesurgical treatment showed that neurologic status had been improved significantly in more than80% of the patients with SCIWORET and the mean recovery rate with the JOA score was57.9% in Type I, 51.5% in Type II and 48.2% in Type III.Conclusions: Classification for SCIWORET according to preexisting factors may be used asa basic guidance for surgical decision-making and good outcomes can be achieved.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate retrospectively the preexisting factors, classification andcorresponding surgical treatments for spinal cord injury without radiologic evidence of trauma(SCIWORET).Methods: Seventy-five patients with SCIWORET were reviewed to analyze theirdemographic information, mechanisms of injury, neurologic status, imaging manifestation,and surgical management along with outcome. Classification for SCIWORET was proposedand unique aspects of this classification system along with surgical management and outcomewas discussed. In this study, the American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) scale wasused to evaluate the neurologic status of the patients and neurologic evaluation was performedbefore and after surgery according to the criteria proposed by the Japanese OrthopedicAssociation (JOA).Results: The review indicated that there were chiefly 3 groups of preexisting factors asfollows: (1) Type I(20%): disc herniation or segmental instability. (2) Type II(52%):obviousdecrease or even disappearance of the storing space of spinal canal, including congenitalspinal canal stenosis, multi-segmental cervical spondylosis, ossification of the posteriorlongitudinal ligament (OPLL) (3) Type III(28%): decrease of the storing space of spinal canalcombined with segmental instability or disc herniation .The postoperative follow-ups for thesurgical treatment showed that neurologic status had been improved significantly in more than80% of the patients with SCIWORET and the mean recovery rate with the JOA score was57.9% in Type I, 51.5% in Type II and 48.2% in Type III.Conclusions: Classification for SCIWORET according to preexisting factors may be used asa basic guidance for surgical decision-making and good outcomes can be achieved.

Özet

Amaç: Retrospektif olarak radyolojik kanıt olmaksızın servikal spinal kord yaralanmasının(SCIWORET) öncelikli etmenleri, sınıflandırması ve eşdeğerli cerrahi tedavilerideğerlendirmek.Yöntemler: SCIWORET tanılı 75 hasta demografik bilgileri, yaralanma mekanizmaları,nörolojik durumları, görüntüleme ve cerrahi yönetimi sonuçları açılarından analiz edilerekderlendi. SCIWORET için sınıflandırma cerrahi yönetim ve sonuçları yönü ile özgünsınıflandırma sistemi tartışıldı. Bu çalışmada Amerikan Spinal Kord Yaralanma Derneğinin(ASIA) skalası ve cerrahi öncesi ve sonrası nörolojik değerlendirme için de Japon OrtopediBirliğinin (JOA) önerdiği kriterler kullanıldı.Sonuçlar: Bu çalışma temelde 3 grup öncelikli faktörün mevcudiyetini gösterdi: (1) Tip I(%20) : Disk fıtıklaşması ve segmental instabilite. (2) Tip II (%52): Posterior LongitidunalLigaman Kalsifikasyonu (OPLL), multisegmental servikal spondiloz, kongenital spinal stenozdahil spinal kanalın yedekleme aralığının kaybolması ya da belirgin derecede azalması. (3)Tip III (%28): Spinal kanalın yedekleme aralığının kaybı yanı sıra segmental instabilite veyadisk fıtıklaşması. Cerrahi tedavinin postoperative izleminde SCIWORET hastalarının%80inden fazlasında nörolojik durumun önemli ölçüde düzeldiği ve ortalama şifa oranınınJOA skoruna gore Tip I için %57,9, Tip II için % 51,5 ve Tip III için ise %48,2 olduğunugösterdi.Yargı: Öncelikli faktörlere göre bir temel kılavuz olarak SCIWORET sınıflaması cerrahikarar verme ve iyi sonuçlar elde etmede bir temel kılavuz olarak kullanılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SUN, L., SHEN, Y., LIU, L., LU, Z. (2022). Servikal Spinal Kord Yaralanmasında Travmanın Radyolojik Kanıtı Olmaksızın Sınıflandırma ve Cerrahi Karar Verme. Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish), Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 660–673. https://ajindex.com/articles/565102

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alander DH, Parker J, Stauff er ES. Intermediate-term outcome of cervical spinal cord-inj ured patients older than 50 years of age. Spine 1997; 22(11): 1189–92
  2. Bose B, Northrup BE, Osterhorm JL, Cotler JM, DiTunno JF. Reanalysis of central cervical cord inj ury management. Neurosurgery 1984; 15(3): 367–72
  3. Brodkey JS, Miller CF Jr, Harmody RM. The syndrome of acute central cervical spinal cord inj ury revisited. Surg Neurol 1980; 14(4): 251– 7
  4. Chen TY, Dickman CA, Eleraky M, Sonntag VK. The role of decompression f or acute incomplete cervical spinal cord inj ury in cervical spondylosis. Spine 1998; 23(22): 2398–2403
  5. Chen TY, Lee ST, Lui TN, Wong CW, Yeh YS, Tzaan WC, Hung SY. Eff icacy of surgical treatment in traumatic central cord syndrome. Surg Neurol 1997; 48: 435–41
  6. Dai L, Jia L. Central cord Inj ury complicating acute cervical disc herniation in trauma. Spine 2000; 25(3):331–6 7. Dvorak MF, Fisher CG, Hoekema J, Boyd M, Noonan V, Wing PC, Kwon BK. Factors predicting motor recovery and f unctional outcome af ter traumatic central cord syndrome: A Long-term Follow-up. Spine 2005; 30(20): 2303-11
  7. Ehara S, Shimamura T. Cervical spine inj ury in the elderly: imaging f eatures. Skeletal Radiol 2000; 30 (1): 1–7
  8. Epstein N, Epstein JA, Benj amin V, Ransohoff J. Traumatic myelopathy in patients with cervical spinal stenosis without f racture or dislocation: methods of diagnosis, management, and prognosis. Spine 1980; 5(6):489–96
  9. Fehlings MG, Perrin RG. The role and timing of early decompression f or cervical spinal cord inj ury: update with a review of recent clinical evidence. Inj ury 2005. 36 (S2): B13-26
  10. Fuj iwara K, Yonenobu K, Ebara S, Yamashita K, Ono K. The prognosis of surgery f or cervical compression myelopathy: an analysis of the f actors involved. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989; 71: 393-8
  11. Hardy AG. Cervical spinal cord inj ury without bony inj ury. Paraplegia 1977, 14(4): 296-305
  12. Hagen EM, Aarli JA, Gronning M. The clinical signif icance of spinal cord inj uries in patients older than 60 years of age. Acta Neurol Scand 2005; 112(1): 42–7
  13. Harrop JS, Sharan A, Ratliff J. Central cord inj ury: pathophysiology, management, and outcomes. Spine J 2006, 6(6 S): 198-206
  14. Hayashi K, Yone K, Ito H, Yanase M, Sakou T. MRI f indings in patients with a cervical spinal cord inj ury who do not show radiographic evidence of a f racture or dislocation. Paraplegia 1995; 33 (4):212–215
  15. Kasimatis GB, Panagiot